Problem Formulation and Identification
Problem Formulation and Identification
Problem Formulation and Identification
Organizations literally live and die by their ability to solve challenges that rise up on a continual basis. While many problems are simply remedied on the move, many can become complex and difficult to even define. Companies that do not properly define the issues they are dealing with can quickly find themselves applying patches to symptoms of much larger problems. Doctors Medical Center, Dillards Inc., Benton County Foods, and McLeod Insurance Agency are examples of companies within the Northwest Arkansas area that use systematic techniques in first defining what problem the organization is dealing with, then designing a solution for it. Each company is unique in its approach, but this disparity does not diminish the effectiveness once implemented.
Lou Gerstner, a former consultant and IBM chief said he “believes every decision is stronger when a group of people argue about it debate it, try to figure out how to make it better (Chapter 2 paragraph 31). The current decision making method utilized in Doctors Medical Center, is the “Keep it Simple”, or “Limited Search Error” process. The physician wanted input from all stakeholders, however, rather than taking the information into consideration in most cases she had a plan in her head and everybody knew what was gong to happen.
The limited search method is, simply put, staying within reach, never taking a chance, or going with the grain, so to speak. The office was set up on a tried and true foundation, “no need to do anything different if what you are doing is working,” Doc said on many occasions, and never truly searched for an alternate because the method she always used was available. The operating procedures and the effectiveness of the office could have been extraordinary if Doc could have taken a step back off of the “status quo” mobile.
Chapter 2 mentions the benefits of “brainstorming:” involving the staff, creating more ideas, getting more people involved, and creating numerous options rather than a few comfortable prospects. In a busy Medical Office, there obviously were opportunities to implement the “Keep it Simple” method. On one occasion an employees schedule did not reflect her leave request. The employee saw her name on the schedule and was told to find someone else to cover her shift. The employee tried but was unsuccessful. She did not come to work as scheduled, which created a shortage of nurses in the office that day. The following week the employee came to work as scheduled and Doc would not allow here to clock in until the staff met. At the meeting the office rules and regulation manual pertaining to leave and earning was read aloud. It was clear what had to be done, but everyone was feeling uneasy about the employee being terminated. Even though, Doc wanted to keep it simple, and contended that was why the rule and regulatory manual was designed.
Another factor (outside of the box) found by including the other employees was that the employee in question had a funeral to attend; having that information made the difference.
This example was one of the many that solidified Docs standards of continuous improvement; she also realized that to improve her “keep it simple” method of decision making, the process was going to have to change. This change would be implemented gradually, while exploring other options.
The most prevalent thinking process in the Dillards Inc. (Dillards) company is creative thinking. The sales department of Dillards has learned persuasive sales tactics, depending on different departments. The cosmetics sales associates have always been taught to sit a client down, not call them a customer, and pull a card which keeps their personal preferences. In recent activities concerning soliciting