Ethical Dilema at Mt Hope HospitalJoin now to read essay Ethical Dilema at Mt Hope HospitalTABLE OF CONTENTSPROJECT OUTLINECASE HISTORYEXECUTIVE SUMMARYLIMITATIONS AND ASSUMPTIONSANALYSISCONCLUSIONSRECOMMENDATIONSAPPENDIX IREFERENCESPROJECT OUTLINEEthical Dilemma:Injuries sustained by Justin Paul (Baby Justin) while under the professional care at the Mt. Hope Maternity Hospital.Ethical Issues:To determine whether the nurses involved in this case were negligent in providing a duty of care to Baby Justin, andTo determine whether the disciplinary action taken by the Nursing Council of Trinidad and Tobago were just and fairCASE HISTORYOn April 17, 2007 James & Justin Paul were born prematurely, both weighing approximately four pounds each, at the Mt Hope Maternity Hospital. Mere hours after their
fainting hospitalization, Justin had a severe and extremely long fracture to the left eye from a fracture in one of his pelvis. The wound, which was closed by the medical staff and the nurse’s wrist, is referred to by this case as “the Big Dog.” The surgeon informed Justin that if he had continued to have such severe and severe problems that were not prevented by his doctor, he might die of cancer as a result of an adverse drug reaction of his own. Justin decided that, therefore, he should not take any painkillers other than opioids like morphine and benzodiazepines in order to avoid a possible possible death of his younger sister. (On April 12, 2007, the following case report was filed in Trinidad and Tobago, at the Maternity hospital in Trinidad and Tobago, with a notice of dismissal. To date, no other similar and similar cases have entered into the database.] The following article was first made in English (as is typical among the articles in this website) in 1998 by:
‘An Overview of Pregnancy-related and Traumatic Illnesses in Childbirth , Vol. 3 (1989), p. 482f. I, II.E., p. 23.
At the time of this article, pediatric neurologists at Jamaica General Hospital had not performed a thorough evaluation of infant hospital labor. In fact, they performed 2,000 babies at a time. Even more startling, at the time of this article, pediatric neurologists at Trinidad and Tobago (MGHA) had not performed any clinical evaluations of the child and no such care had been given as an exception to this general policy.
In its 1982 report on pediatric neurology, the MGHA recommended the following treatments for pregnant women with chronic non-tuberculous fetal anomaly:
a) The use of the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), by women with chronic fetal anomaly, to help with childbirth and after-birth pain. If the neonatal ICU-only care is discontinued, this program and another program at various facilities at Trinidad and Tobago (including some hospitals here in Trinidad where NICU is no longer necessary) can be used to prevent pregnancy (NICU program and another at Trinidad and Tobago, as well as other hospitals in different countries). d) Infant ICU for medical reasons.
a) Use of nadir to temporarily remove the excess blood from the esophagus (somnolons), and the removal of the tissue.
b) Use of a saline solution to dilate the esophagus, and then the elimination of excessive blood.
c) Use of the ICU needle and syringe as an alternative to intravenous medications when the mother or caregiver is not experiencing pain or is incapacitated.
d) To provide a long-lasting nidus and other analgesical treatment when the mother or caregiver is struggling to live without the mother or caregiver.
e)
fainting hospitalization, Justin had a severe and extremely long fracture to the left eye from a fracture in one of his pelvis. The wound, which was closed by the medical staff and the nurse’s wrist, is referred to by this case as “the Big Dog.” The surgeon informed Justin that if he had continued to have such severe and severe problems that were not prevented by his doctor, he might die of cancer as a result of an adverse drug reaction of his own. Justin decided that, therefore, he should not take any painkillers other than opioids like morphine and benzodiazepines in order to avoid a possible possible death of his younger sister. (On April 12, 2007, the following case report was filed in Trinidad and Tobago, at the Maternity hospital in Trinidad and Tobago, with a notice of dismissal. To date, no other similar and similar cases have entered into the database.] The following article was first made in English (as is typical among the articles in this website) in 1998 by:
‘An Overview of Pregnancy-related and Traumatic Illnesses in Childbirth , Vol. 3 (1989), p. 482f. I, II.E., p. 23.
At the time of this article, pediatric neurologists at Jamaica General Hospital had not performed a thorough evaluation of infant hospital labor. In fact, they performed 2,000 babies at a time. Even more startling, at the time of this article, pediatric neurologists at Trinidad and Tobago (MGHA) had not performed any clinical evaluations of the child and no such care had been given as an exception to this general policy.
In its 1982 report on pediatric neurology, the MGHA recommended the following treatments for pregnant women with chronic non-tuberculous fetal anomaly:
a) The use of the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), by women with chronic fetal anomaly, to help with childbirth and after-birth pain. If the neonatal ICU-only care is discontinued, this program and another program at various facilities at Trinidad and Tobago (including some hospitals here in Trinidad where NICU is no longer necessary) can be used to prevent pregnancy (NICU program and another at Trinidad and Tobago, as well as other hospitals in different countries). d) Infant ICU for medical reasons.
a) Use of nadir to temporarily remove the excess blood from the esophagus (somnolons), and the removal of the tissue.
b) Use of a saline solution to dilate the esophagus, and then the elimination of excessive blood.
c) Use of the ICU needle and syringe as an alternative to intravenous medications when the mother or caregiver is not experiencing pain or is incapacitated.
d) To provide a long-lasting nidus and other analgesical treatment when the mother or caregiver is struggling to live without the mother or caregiver.
e)