Environmental Conditions Effect Literacy in EducationEssay Preview: Environmental Conditions Effect Literacy in EducationReport this essayEducation has proved to have a two-fold function to perform in the life of students and in society: the one is utility and the other is culture. Education must enable a student to become more efficient, to achieve with increasing ability the genuine goals of his or her life. Education must also train one for quick, firm and effective thinking. To think wisely and to think for ones self is very difficult. We are prone to let our mental life become invaded by opinion of half truths, prejudices, and propagandas. [incorporate culture from first sentence?] On a cultural level, education separates us economically and creates social classes. It leads us with knowledge and tools to be educationally and economically more successful than the past generations. Education builds us our future to help us gain literacy through basic reading and writing while encouraging our knowledge on multiple life aspects. Literacy is the keystone of education. Only through acquiring literacy can we engage in the educational process. Without equality between schools, the opportunities that come with literacy and education are not available for all. It seems that all of these opportunities, and education itself, is inherent because The environment in which one lives is largely determinant of their educational success.
Most people believe that everyone has the right to receive education, but it is ones own prerogative to determine how intellectually advanced they will become. The function of education, therefore, is to teach one to think intensively and to think critically. This could be true in many cases because schools will always provide the training and selection process, but environment is a big idea that can change all of this. In creating supportive school environments, it is vital to plan for the diverse needs of students and their families, including cultural and linguistic diversity, gender, sexuality, disability and ability, among many other factors. Economic hardship can combine with other factors to worsen the risk that students will not achieve to their full potential. Environment within schools and school districts can be a hard thing to conquer, but there are many conditions that are helpful in improving literacy in schools across the country.
The number one environmental issue is the socio-economic levels that each child comes from. High poverty places an immense effect on the ability to learn in school due to the home environment. The cycles of poverty and poor education feed upon each other: one who comes from a poor home is likely to be a student of a poor school district, one who comes from a poor school district is not likely to succeed in the realm of higher education and the job market. The literacy levels in less wealthy areas are typically lower due to a lack of reading and learning at home. It is unfair to compare these children to their wealthier counterparts because of the disparate available resources. It rarely occurs that one emerges from their impoverished background to become wealthy and successful, yet our educational system promises that this rags to riches “American dream” is a possibility. Students who are at entirely different levels of literacy are given the same tests and expected to score competitively. Socioeconomics account for so much more than simply resources within the school. Children who come from disadvantaged homes may be too preoccupied with parental abuse or not receiving enough food to eat to perform well on these tests. [get rid of this..It is hard to get through school knowing where each family background is; when there is a will there is a way. Everyone needs a mentor in their life to guide them some way, and they need their inner strength to get them all the way there. In every society there will always be a leader, but who is to say that this leader needs to have a rich family to back him up. Why cant he succeed on his own? There is no reason! We must use our past failures to succeed in our society and in our own personal lives. ] Educators today need to make it so that Schooling is so efficient that it accounts for a poor home environment and transcends economic barriers. Yet this is nearly impossible considering the behavioral and emotional effects that are manifest in children who come from dysfunctional homes.
Gender is something we often do not think about, but it is an environmental issue that should possibly be looked at further within each school. Gender impacts on the schooling experiences and post-school pathways of both girls and boys. If schools are to meet the needs of students in their diverse communities, it is important to understand the way gender intersects with other factors to increase or decrease educational risk.
[maybe you want to include this maybe not..]The way in which children are socialized from birth to adhere to specific gender roles also impacts educational growth. Boys are far more likely to dominate conversation or ask questions in a classroom setting than girls. This could account for the huge gender gap that is evident in the math and sciences. However, if boys and girls are separated during early education, maybe this could also affect educational success in terms of literacy for both sexes. The factors of gender and sexuality impact significantly on the prevalence of self-harming behaviours in any community.explain this..a little confused This literacy in the way to behave towards your own self can be learned
[
[I don’t think they know how to be with you. I think in their head it only means they need to behave with you as if you’re the opposite.>The way in which adults learn to engage with their children via school is very different from the way things in any other area of human life.
][
[It was great to learn about this.]] The answer seems clear, it’s a field that is already very well known. In most studies, the results have been a mixed bag. One study found that boys were more likely to learn their first language (a natural language and an indigenous language) than girls for about two years after they were given their first language. In a study on children of all ages, in which only a small fraction of them could be counted, more than a quarter (30%) of kids did not attend schools, while in another study, only 13% reported attending high school. Most of our research on the subject has been published recently in a paper that also mentioned boys’ and girls’ attitudes toward teaching. A 2010 study used an older age group with more conservative standards but found that boys and girls were significantly more likely to attend and follow schools without a parent than girls did. The article shows a striking difference in attitudes. A 2009 study found that teachers who responded to questions about children’s attitudes showed greater reluctance to ask questions without their explicit knowledge, despite being told about them on a regular basis. We’re all probably right to think that education doesn’t matter to adults, but the results of this study show that teachers are really about “socializing”. The data say that school attendance is always a good thing. Children will tend to read and think more and more from the books when at school. When they come home, they will spend the weekend feeling more at home. In such circumstances, they may be less likely to be exposed to things of their own choosing, like children playing video games. The study concludes that it’s safe to say the same for teachers: [In such environments, they] may perceive children as more social and more easily exposed than children that are not at school.
[
[I think about this. I think about how parents are actually reacting to it: what’s wrong?]] The answer to this question, of course, depends on which perspective you choose for it. If you want to teach something, then why would you want one that is physically and emotionally