Comm 215 – the Value and Cost of Adding Domestic Partner Benefits
Essay Preview: Comm 215 – the Value and Cost of Adding Domestic Partner Benefits
Report this essay
The Value and Cost of Adding Domestic Partner Benefits
COMM/215
February 3, 2011
Dr. Blue
Without a doubt, in a little more than a decade, domestic partner benefits have gone from virtually nonexistent to the predominant plan among the largest U.S. employers. More than 51 percent of Fortune 500 companies offer Domestic Partner Benefits; these employers have found an added greater value for them at minimal cost.Studies reveal employers who offer Domestic Partner Benefits are able to attract talented employees, increase employee morale, and experience low or minimal increase in cost. This research paper will reveal the Values of offering domestic partner benefits as well as address the Cost associated with it.
Can Be Used to Attract Talented Employee Competitively:
The value of offering domestic partner benefits is that it can be used as a powerful recruiting tool as well as to help retain talented and committed employees, according to the League of Minnesota Cities. Studies suggest that employees make decisions about job offers based on domestic partner benefits. Very skilled and highly trained workers may hold out for a company that offers domestic partner benefits. A benefit package that appeals to a diverse workforce gives employers an edge when it comes to recruiting. Also, there is value in the statement that offering the benefits makes about your companys acceptance of domestic partner relationships.
Employee Enrollment is Minimal:
While there is value in offering domestic partner benefits, enrollment is low even among employees who are eligible. According to Salary.com only two to three percent of same sex couples who work for a company with domestic partner benefits take advantage of the programs.
Current Employees will be healthier, more satisfied, and less likely to leave their jobs:
Offering domestic partner benefits shows a supportive workplace climate with supportive policies. A supportive workplace allows “disclosure”, which has positive benefits to workers health; which means lower levels of anxiety and less conflict between work and personal life. Studies revealed that lesbian, gay and bisexual workers who “disclosure” report greater job satisfaction. Additionally, partner benefits reduce gay, lesbian and bisexual workers turnover and increase their commitment to employers.
Socially and Economically Just:
The movement toward domestic partnership benefits in the workplace is rooted in the egalitarian principal that equal work warrants equal pay, including employment benefits. According to the 2000 U.S. Census, one-fifth of male same-sex households and one-third of female same-sex households were raising children. Estimates of children living in same-sex households range between six and ten million; no percentage of these children should be without access to health insurance. For some employees, it could represent health insurance they would otherwise be unable to get.
Diversity for Everyone:
Everyone profits from a more diverse environment as it creates a welcoming atmosphere for all. Offering domestic partner benefits would demonstrate that the company embraces diversity.
Increased Productivity:
Employees in domestic partnerships become more productive, morale increases as well as loyalty because the financial pressures on their households are relieved to the same degree as other employees, and because their employers recognize, value, and support them.
Cost Factors:
The cost of health insurance is continually on the rise, which makes health care compensation more of a concern for employees and their dependents. However, the total costs of adding domestic partner benefits to the employees benefits packages are insignificant. A study taken in 2005 by Hewitt associates shows that the majority of employers experience a total benefits cost increase of less than one percent (Luther, 2006 ). When a company needs to stay competitive, the last thing it needs to neglect are the necessities of its own employees. Adding to the constantly growing number of solid companies to consider when seeking employment; Companys should consider which benefits are offered. J.D. Piro, chairman of the health law group at Hewitt, says the major driver of health care costs for many employers are triggered by women of child-bearing age because of maternity expenses. For “obvious reasons,” he says that is not a factor for gay couples (Moon, 2005).
Health benefits are shown to be a greater portion of a persons compensation offered by an employer as opposed to receiving wages and salaries alone. Since the 1950s the average compensation one receives from an employer in the form of either salary or wages has decreased by 14% (Luther, 2006). Numerous studies have shown that domestic partner benefits do not have a significant impact on the overall cost of health care insurance and can have a positive impact on hiring, retention and employee morale. Domestic partner benefits have a positive effect on productivity because it provides a safety net to employees. “As of March 1, 2006, 49% of the Fortune 500 and 78% of the Fortune 100 largest corporations offered health benefits to employees domestic partners, compared to just 25 % of the Fortune 500 in 2000” (Luther, 2006).
Although conservative groups such as the American Family Association call domestic partner benefits a “prohibitively expensive” and says they “increase costs across the board for all employees.” A recent study by Hewitt associates disputes that allegation. Less than 1% of workers opted to enroll their same-sex spouses in Massachusetts even after same-sex marriage was legalized in the state two years ago (Moon, 2005).
An exact cost of benefits to employees to companies is not easily attainable due to lack of current statistic during this research. However, in relation to health benefits, employers do typically pay the bulk the bill, paying for about 75% of the health costs. While this does dot not represent benefits to domestic partners, it does offer a framework as to what employers would consider paying for domestic partners benefits.
Cost is certainly an important consideration but it is not the only issue to deliberate. Appreciating the complexity and orientation of the family is important because