Domestic Violence Against WomenJoin now to read essay Domestic Violence Against WomenIntroductionViolence in the home is a subject of increasingly public concern. According to Davis in the Encyclopedia of Social Work, “The most affected victims, physically and psychologically, are women, including single and married women and women separated or divorced from their partners” (Davis, 1995, p.789). For years violence against women has been excluded from everyday conversations for many reasons. Women of all races and social levels are victims of violence in the home. There are many theories as to why this problem has been ignored for centuries with no focused attention. Violence is clearly a problem. Most agree that the solution to violence against women is to prevent it completely from ever occurring through measures which include harsher laws such as policies and procedures.
Domestic Violence against women reaches all socioeconomic levels. Domestic Violence is not prejudice. However, most women whom suffer from domestic violence have come from a life of poverty and little or no education. There are many factors that play in part for a woman to become a victim of domestic violence.
The question of why a woman would stay in an abusive relationship is of concern too. There are many factors as to why a woman would choose to stay in an abusive relationship or marriage. Most stay due to lack of finances, living stables, lack of education and for their children. For the most part, women whom do leave an abusive home must resort to government assistance as a means of support: Which often fails and many times forcing them to return. From half to two thirds of women receiving public assistance are victims of domestic violence (Barusch, 2002).
Some women may stay in an abusive marriage due to the lack of laws to protect them from harm or in the event that another person will threaten harm. In recent years, laws have been improved on to assist women in this area. Policies and procedure by the courts and law enforcement have been making improvements as well. For some, the belief of harsher and stricter laws and punishment will be the only way to put an end to domestic violence against women.
Women who are abused in the home by their spouses should understand that it is not the couple’s problem. Marriage counseling will not fix “his” problem. Women need not blame themselves. It is a problem which ”he” needs to fix. Violence against any woman, no matter who the deliverer of the violence, is a form of crime (The National Women’s Health Information Center, 2002). There are many factors to be considered in determining why batterers batter and will be discussed later in this paper.
Awareness of the problem is leading to more and more research on the matter. Women, to begin with, need equal rights in order to rid society of this problem. Beginning in the late 1970s, women who were concerned and many of whom were once victims of domestic violence themselves have developed services in assistance to help other victims of violence. They have been active in bringing the public’s attention to this problem and also have been active in the effort of receiving funds (Davis, 1995).
In the Encyclopedia of Social Work: Domestic Violence, Davis states that ”Federal policy, thus far has been restricted to providing support for the emergency and short-term needs of victims and their dependants. The Family Violence Prevention and Services Act of 1984 have provided funds for states to allocate primarily to support temporary shelter for battered women. The Victims of Crime Act (1984) has given priority to victims of spouse abuse for compensation for crime related costs. The Violence Against Women Act, introduced in 1991 but not yet out of committee, is designed, among other things, to increase substantially the amount of federal funds available for states to support domestic violence programs and to allow federal dollars to support statewide coalitions of organizations for battered women”(1995, p.786 ).
Also, according to George, listed in Violence: North America, “The Passage in 1994 to the Violence Against Women Act, provided $1.8 billion, greatly expanded efforts in the United States to implement programs to prevent violence against women. Colleges and universities in Canada and the Unites States have begun incorporating classes on violence prevention in orientation courses. In addition, the proliferation of women’s studies programs has increased research into the causes of such violence and into methods to prevent the various forms of physical oppression. Meanwhile, private groups such as the U.S. National Organization for Women (NOW) have sponsored programs in elementary and high schools to educate young people on issues of violence and sexual harassmentThe U. S. Government raised amount of grants allocated to prevent
t a program involving a number of key women’s rights programs, among them: the Violence Against Women Prevention Act — The Prevention of Women’s Illness, to be funded $12.6 million, but no funds are being withheld. Women’s issues have become one of the top and most neglected topics in the civil rights movement as more and more young people are aware of the fact that women are victims of violence while raising concerns about whether or not they are protected in some form or by some method of punishment, discrimination or violence from their fellow women. However, the focus has shifted from preventing the oppression to preventing those oppression and, in all cases, have resulted in many women being jailed, expelled or excluded as a result of their experiences. Women are currently one of the most underrepresented women in the legal system in the United States. The Violence Against Women Prevention Act has been used, as an example on other issues, including in the context of a “tough on crime” legislation sponsored in Colorado. However, the fact remains that, by not having received funds to implement violence prevention such the Violence Against Women Prevention Act, this legislation would have made it harder for other violent offenders to commit those acts, resulting in a huge increase in potential violence against women being committed by some of the world´s biggest criminal gangs. In addition, while the Violence Against Women Prevention Act has been used to prevent those abuses, a number of non-violent criminal offenders or gangs are still using the Act and the provisions contained there, where perpetrators are imprisoned, not even prosecuted. The fact is that women are often able to have that sort of a successful, significant impact on people’s lives, and that it is very important at an individual level for such an act to not be implemented. This legislation could have not only addressed the issues of harassment in the workplace but also those of sexual violence in the workplace, especially when there were non-violent offenders. Although it has not been implemented so far, the law remains significant in that it should be enacted in an innovative and effective way to address the societal issues that women and girls face in both their personal lives and public safety.
t a program involving a number of key women’s rights programs, among them: the Violence Against Women Prevention Act — The Prevention of Women’s Illness, to be funded $12.6 million, but no funds are being withheld. Women’s issues have become one of the top and most neglected topics in the civil rights movement as more and more young people are aware of the fact that women are victims of violence while raising concerns about whether or not they are protected in some form or by some method of punishment, discrimination or violence from their fellow women. However, the focus has shifted from preventing the oppression to preventing those oppression and, in all cases, have resulted in many women being jailed, expelled or excluded as a result of their experiences. Women are currently one of the most underrepresented women in the legal system in the United States. The Violence Against Women Prevention Act has been used, as an example on other issues, including in the context of a “tough on crime” legislation sponsored in Colorado. However, the fact remains that, by not having received funds to implement violence prevention such the Violence Against Women Prevention Act, this legislation would have made it harder for other violent offenders to commit those acts, resulting in a huge increase in potential violence against women being committed by some of the world´s biggest criminal gangs. In addition, while the Violence Against Women Prevention Act has been used to prevent those abuses, a number of non-violent criminal offenders or gangs are still using the Act and the provisions contained there, where perpetrators are imprisoned, not even prosecuted. The fact is that women are often able to have that sort of a successful, significant impact on people’s lives, and that it is very important at an individual level for such an act to not be implemented. This legislation could have not only addressed the issues of harassment in the workplace but also those of sexual violence in the workplace, especially when there were non-violent offenders. Although it has not been implemented so far, the law remains significant in that it should be enacted in an innovative and effective way to address the societal issues that women and girls face in both their personal lives and public safety.