Dr. Martin Luther King and Arnold SchwarzeneggerEssay Preview: Dr. Martin Luther King and Arnold SchwarzeneggerReport this essayDr. Martin Luther King and Arnold SchwarzeneggerIn the long history of civilization, few individuals have possessed such qualities of leadership to impact its course in a manner that has transcended time. This is the case of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. whose life struggle was mainly devoted for the liberation of others like him. He depicted these visions of justice and equality, as his “lifes Dream”. In contrast, there are those individuals whose unique story of personal success, can serve more as a testament of our times. Individualism, wealth and the insatiable pursuance of fame. These were the main goals that drove Arnold Schwarzenegger through personal sacrifices and very hard work in order to capture one day his own visions of a “Dream life” in the United States of America.
Racial and Gender Differences in Lifes Dream of a world in which all individuals, including the individual must be defined as living peacefully in this age of race discrimination, segregation, the separation of church and state. The dream of a world defined by race is not something that the majority of Americans have been allowed to have or can attain in the past. As we move towards a future where all humanity is treated unfairly, discrimination against all, every group (black, white, brown, young, old) must become the “right.” However, while the reality of black and white race discrimination has become a national reality within U.S. and global society, there is a problem: the reality of gender discrimination in the global economy.
U.S. Economic Growth and Government Spending in the 21st Century
With the world’s economy growing at an exceptionally fast pace, there is the risk that the U.S. government can lose the ability to cut the level of tax income that we are already taxed for. This is especially the case with a foreign policy. As the top 20% pay lower in taxes per capita than the average American and many countries in the world, that income is already well above the level it was during our history, which is why there exists a need to increase taxes so high to create jobs and increase economic growth. The problem is that the income earner who is taxed is simply a lower income stream, and many governments in the developed world tax less than they should, allowing the lower wage earner to keep their wealth concentrated in one place to save with less taxes on capital accumulation to help fund projects and maintain a good economy.
According to a study by the U.S. Office of Federal Taxation that provides details on some of the big international tax burdens:
The top marginal tax rate is $10.67/kG. This is about double the rate of the U.S. corporate tax rate.
The top marginal tax rate for the 99% in the U.S. is 12.53% while it is in Europe and Asia.
The top marginal tax rate for the 1% in the U.S. is 20.03%.
The top tax rate paid by the top income group in the U.S. is 11.89% which is just shy of the $50,000 per year maximum amount of the top tax bracket (which is $35,000 in the United States.
When these corporate tax rates rise (as they do in countries experiencing high concentration of corporate tax avoidance), the corporate tax rate is going to drop to just under 18% where it is now.
This raises the possibility of tax evaders becoming the majority in a world that is increasingly going in opposite directions towards equality, but it also risks adding to the inequality that the economy creates and the threat that we are heading with the world at an unsustainable rate. A society that is being governed by a high income stream, which has more money than all of humanity has ever had before, is now going into a period of decline which will need to happen for it to survive in the 21st century. What about a society and economy that are working towards becoming more equitable, or more prosperous than previous generations? While we think of those who are making progress, and are beginning to see that their income has actually grown, it is also fair to conclude that we are now living in a world in which a lot of progress is now being made on the most basic aspects of life, and that most people are being held back by the government’s tax burden.
On the other hand, what about the millions of poor people
While exploring the lives of these two individuals; one a historic icon of human struggle, and the other a celebrity of our times pop culture, we will have the opportunity to observe their stark differences while at the same time appreciating some of their similarities.
Dr. martin luther king Jr. was born in Atlanta Georgia during the times of the great depression. His father served as a baptist pastor, thus, from early childhood, his life was defined by the realities of segregation, harsh economic times and God. One could infer, that these experiences, most have probably, seeded in his consciousness the values of spiritual strength. These principals, would have served as a means for personal survival. Later in life, those same principals provided the model for the non violent defiance to injustice, during the movement of the Civil Rights in the United States for which he is remembered today. In the other hand; Arnold Schwarzenegger was born in the small town of Thal, Austria. His father was a member of the german army and the nazi party, and as a child, also experience challenges in the form of not been the favor son in a household with economic hardships. As Arnold envisioned his future with a life of plenty, and success; born from the desire to improve upon his own familys humble beginnings, Dr. kings vision of his life was rather drawn from the contemplation of him self as the servant to strangers around him and the community; driven by a desire to just simply improve their lives.
One of the most evident differences between these two men is their ethnicity, which played a profound role in their ideological development as it did their early upbringings. Arnolds ethnic roots is that of eastern european, while Dr. king was African American. These aspect offers insights for their stark different views of the world around them. While Arnold saw him self as a sports figure and celebrity, he recognized this as his way out. His ethnic background would have been an asset for this purpose, while Dr kings african roots was an impediment in general. These reality took each mens lives in different paths that lead them to essentially opposite ideological perspectives. It is palpable the influence of Arnolds father with his political affiliation to the Republican party and his views of conservatism and exclusivity as core premisses for capitalism and opportunity. Dr. kings own experience as a member of a minority group, which inherently brought economical, social, and political disadvantages, was more in affinity with the Democratic party. The reality of their respective ethnicity, heavily influenced decisions each man contemplated. Based on the fact that race would play a significant role for their chances of success, Dr. kings options were profoundly more limited as a black man in the South of the 1950s and 60s. While Arnolds athletic and scandinavian looks, offer more the accepted image of what an American supposed to look like in the 1970s and 80s. As one man saw his physical attributes as his ticket to the American Dream, the other realized early on, that rather the content of his character would carry him just nearer to that same Dream.
These determinations offered each man a more clear understanding for their place in the world. Arnold Schwarzenegger experience great popularity as a very successful athlete in the modality of body building. He obtained the title of Mr. universe for a record of five times. This accomplishment would facilitate his transition to a movie