To What Extent Is The Economic Development Of The Accession Countries Likely To Be As A Result Of Eu Regional Policy?Essay Preview: To What Extent Is The Economic Development Of The Accession Countries Likely To Be As A Result Of Eu Regional Policy?Report this essayThe ten accession countries joined the EU on 1st May 2004. The countries are: Cyprus, Slovenia, Malta, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia. There are a number of ways in which the economies of the accession countries differ to those of the EU fifteen. Firstly, all of the accession countries have larger agricultural sectors than that of the EU fifteen. On average, 20% of the accession countries labour force is employed in agriculture compared to an average of 4% for the EU fifteen. Also, on average, accession countries have smaller economies and lower incomes per head. EU regional policy aims to reduce the differences between the countries. This may be done in a number of ways, for example, through subsides and increased public expenditure by the ECB. It can be argued that EU regional policy is responsible for economic development in the accession countries. However, there is also evidence to show that economic development has occurred due to factors other than EU regional policy.
One the one hand, it is likely that the economic development of the accession countries is likely to be as a result of EU regional policy. One reason for this is that the countries would be entitled to receive financial support from the CAP (Common Agricultural Policy) and from the EUs structural funds. The objectives of CAP are: to increase agricultural productivity, to ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community, to stabilise agricultural markets, to make the area or country self-sufficient in agricultural products and to ensure affordable prices for consumers. These objectives should help those in the agricultural sector to enjoy a higher level of income per head. EU regional policy aims to promote equity and fairness, and this may be done by allowing all of the EU countries to have access to a very large market. This would help the accession countries develop as they will be able to sell goods and services to a market of more than 450 million people, many of whom enjoy high incomes. This could help in widening the size of the accession countries economies, and eventually reduce the regional divide. Being part of a wider market will also help the accession countries to be more efficient. This is because being part of a single market will mean that there is increased competition between the member countries. In order to compete with the other EU countries; accession countries firms will have to modernise and increase their performance. For example, they will need to increase the productivity and quality of the goods and services that they produce. EU regional policy treats each region on an assessment of their economic and social needs. So, the accession countries are likely to receive greater help and funding so that their economies can grow and develop.
Another aim of EU regional policy is to promote economic efficiency. As this should lead to a more balanced regional economy in Europe, employment opportunities should also increase. This should result in rising incomes and greater trade within and between regions, leading to a faster rate of economic growth in the long run. Another EU regional policy is concerned with population movement. This allows the free movement of labour within the EU. It is likely that this will help reduce the differences in employment between the EU fifteen and the accession countries. Another way in which accession countries may have been helped is by receiving European Union subsides. An example of how subsides can help a country if of Ireland; subsides from the EU
The EU is not alone in making more progress in the area of human rights.
The European Human Rights Council (EPHF) has established an International Panel of Experts to be appointed to review the recommendations for the EU’s human rights obligations. The panel has received the most attention. It is working with international and regional partners from across the EU; it has taken part in five rounds of ministerial meetings and consultations. Its recommendations on the status of Syria and the situation in Ukraine are under further review. This includes the work of special rapporteurs, including the Commission, on an extensive range of human rights issues related to the situation in the conflict region, including the right to the same basic human rights as other people. In April, it said that it had reached an agreement on Russia’s accession to the International Criminal Court.
There are also concerns about the draft legislation that will be developed by the ECHR as an instrument of resolution. In May, a report on the European Commission’s work on Human Rights in the field will be signed by a wide range of EU members. It is hoped that, if the legislation becomes law, it will ensure that the work is taken out of the Commission’s control, and it will address various issues, including the legal aspects arising in the case of discrimination against LGBTQ people. That would give the Commission and the Council the freedom to pursue their own investigations. Human rights violations, including sexual orientation, can result if a country denies access to services and services for a protected class of persons, or when a country denies asylum to members of the protected class; these types of breaches will be dealt with as civil and political offences.
However, the European Commission has not yet decided what it will do in this regard. After all, in September, it was revealed that the European Commission had blocked the approval of a draft legislation which was due to be accepted in April 2017. This is a very significant setback for EU-level human rights law. A draft law will include a provision for the Commission to provide advice on the draft laws before the conclusion of the general assembly. Any law or regulation which was approved in late March will be submitted to the President of the Council, but it may not be published to the public until 2019.
Human rights in the UK
This issue was raised recently with the European Parliament regarding the UK’s human rights record. The EC has been in close contact with EU Member States on such matters as the role of women in the UK’s justice system, and whether there is any difference in EU attitudes on women’s rights. Despite this, both the European Commission and the Council are working on other human rights issues, such as the rights of Roma and LGBT people in the UK.
An open and positive relationship between the Council’s European delegation and the European Commission was announced on 10 September 2017.
Further reading:
An open and positive relationship between the Council’s European delegation and the European Commission is announced for the first time on 7 October 2017.
An open and
The EU is not alone in making more progress in the area of human rights.
The European Human Rights Council (EPHF) has established an International Panel of Experts to be appointed to review the recommendations for the EU’s human rights obligations. The panel has received the most attention. It is working with international and regional partners from across the EU; it has taken part in five rounds of ministerial meetings and consultations. Its recommendations on the status of Syria and the situation in Ukraine are under further review. This includes the work of special rapporteurs, including the Commission, on an extensive range of human rights issues related to the situation in the conflict region, including the right to the same basic human rights as other people. In April, it said that it had reached an agreement on Russia’s accession to the International Criminal Court.
There are also concerns about the draft legislation that will be developed by the ECHR as an instrument of resolution. In May, a report on the European Commission’s work on Human Rights in the field will be signed by a wide range of EU members. It is hoped that, if the legislation becomes law, it will ensure that the work is taken out of the Commission’s control, and it will address various issues, including the legal aspects arising in the case of discrimination against LGBTQ people. That would give the Commission and the Council the freedom to pursue their own investigations. Human rights violations, including sexual orientation, can result if a country denies access to services and services for a protected class of persons, or when a country denies asylum to members of the protected class; these types of breaches will be dealt with as civil and political offences.
The EC-KHRTJ Council
1 April 2015
In April’s EC-HRTJ Council, the UK Secretary-General has stated that he will consider “an alternative approach by the ECHR” where it is possible for different parts of the ECHR and Member States to engage in a dialogue on the matter of the rights of LGBT people. This could include by making it illegal for those countries with the most extensive sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination to access services or services, provided they have agreed to change their behavior or behaviour. This action could also prevent a majority of sexual orientation rights groups, who are under pressure for equality or other issues, from making decisions which may not be effective or fair and by strengthening its resolve to get in line. While the UK has worked to ensure that it is not an impediment to further changes in the area, it is clear from the information released thus far that there is a “lack of leadership in terms of a consensus” about when a move needs to be made.
With the Council meeting in early May, we will move on to what would change. The Council needs to do lessening of its political and public scrutiny of the matter, in particular in light of recent reports by the European Commission and OECD suggesting that the proposed reform is inappropriate. By not supporting changes to existing policies and actions, the Council will effectively end a process from which the ECHR would not even be able to start. This is especially alarming given the role homosexuality plays in the life of LGBT people, and the ongoing debates about rights in the world. This is a critical time to review the UK’s approach.
The UK has been criticised for making decisions against gender based access to services
1 April 2015
The UK Council on Human Rights Committee (CCHR) has announced a review of the UK’s decision not to respect gay rights in its laws, legislation and policies. It concluded that the government of the UK should not be allowed to make blanket changes to gender based access, such as making exemptions for civil unions, sex education and gay rights. On the basis of the recommendations made there could be serious ramifications for children of current and future LGBT people.
In response to the CCHR findings, the government says it is prepared to take back the bill as it is. There is now concern that as part of this attempt, an advisory body with powers to review sex based access legislation could be added to the government’s proposed legislation in the years ahead, leading to the government claiming that it could be considered a draft legislation by the time legislation is taken up. This is not entirely a given as the legislation is unlikely to be amended in public without being supported by the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Despite the lack of any clear understanding between the government and Parliament on these issues – if we fail to find a way to make the bill stronger it will only go down from committee to committee. The lack of clarity on how the government intends to apply any particular section of the law in the future could have serious ramifications for children and youth.
In recent weeks, there has been a number of stories about ministers and representatives supporting homophobic discrimination in some of the UK’s most heavily-touted services, as the media often portrays the issue as a matter of civil rights, where such discrimination is currently considered unacceptable. These stories, coupled with reports of homophobia being prevalent in NHS and other services, have led many to turn to Facebook for information on hate crime. It is often an unfortunate result of
However, the European Commission has not yet decided what it will do in this regard. After all, in September, it was revealed that the European Commission had blocked the approval of a draft legislation which was due to be accepted in April 2017. This is a very significant setback for EU-level human rights law. A draft law will include a provision for the Commission to provide advice on the draft laws before the conclusion of the general assembly. Any law or regulation which was approved in late March will be submitted to the President of the Council, but it may not be published to the public until 2019.
Human rights in the UK
This issue was raised recently with the European Parliament regarding the UK’s human rights record. The EC has been in close contact with EU Member States on such matters as the role of women in the UK’s justice system, and whether there is any difference in EU attitudes on women’s rights. Despite this, both the European Commission and the Council are working on other human rights issues, such as the rights of Roma and LGBT people in the UK.
An open and positive relationship between the Council’s European delegation and the European Commission was announced on 10 September 2017.
Further reading:
An open and positive relationship between the Council’s European delegation and the European Commission is announced for the first time on 7 October 2017.
An open and