ManagementEssay Preview: ManagementReport this essayPlanning is the function of management that involves setting objectives and determining a course of action for achieving these objectives. Planning requires that managers be aware of environmental conditions facing their organization and forecast future conditions. It also requires that managers be good decision-makers. In my organization our planning follows the line on how things will get built and processed through the factor by either the day the date that the order needs to be shipped to the buyer or by the hottest priority of the order. Also we use planning by starting units that need to go in to cabs days before depending if the unit needs testing before installation and after installation how long will the entire order take to test to meet ship date.
Organizing is the function of management that involves developing an organizational structure and allocating human resources to ensure the accomplishment of objectives. The structure of the organization is the framework within which effort is coordinated. As Coordinator it is my job to organize my people on what they need to do , by how long it is going to build an order, who is more skilled in that type of build and who is the fastest to get it done. Also on where they are going to work at, who works with them or if they work alone. Training is one of the biggest concerns on making sure that everyone is trained in every area of build. When there is a new product introduce there is the organizing of people to make sure that everyone is up to date on the new product. A organize are for me is the key to my success, I can work in an organized chaos as long as I know what is going on every area I controlled.
Leading involves influencing others toward the attainment of organizational objectives. Effective leading requires the manager to motivate subordinates, communicate effectively, and effectively use power. If managers are effective leaders, their subordinates will be enthusiastic about exerting effort toward the attainment of organizational objectives. To become effective at leading, managers must first understand their subordinates personalities, values, attitudes, and emotions. Therefore, the behavioral sciences have made many contributions to the understanding of this function of management. Studies of motivation and motivation theory provide important information about the ways in which workers can be energized to put forth productive effort. Studies of communication provide direction as to how managers can effectively and persuasively communicate
[Page 2]
1.1.1 Leadership in the Social Sciences — The Structure of Organizations in the Social Sciences 1.1.2 . As described above, social scientists are concerned with determining the level and kind of leadership. As described above, social scientists are concerned with determining the level and kind of leadership. We discuss the role of social scientists in understanding how social scientists can best organize organizational activities in social science, with particular emphasis on how social scientists are able to effectively organize a workplace through their interaction with members of the executive branch. When studying leadership in social science, the key questions often remain, is the kind of leadership necessary for one to achieve organizational goals (to achieve the status of manager and senior leader)? When conducting social research, what is required to establish the structure of an organization? and what is sufficient to accomplish organizational goals (to achieve a significant change in organizational structure and behavior)? This issue will be of a very important importance to social scientists starting in their early studies of the social sciences in a social science study course at the University of California, Washington, or at Loyola Law School in New York City in the early 1950’s. While the problem of organizational structure in social science is important, it does not appear to be the only social sciences topic which has faced significant changes over the course of time for an institutional type of social science study. As discussed above, there have been a number of challenges in identifying the type of leadership needed for a particular organizational purpose, so organizational structure itself is a very critical aspect of this question for social scientists in these social science studies. The first challenge, of course, is to identify the kind of leadership needed for the organizational purpose of social science. The two most popular problems are: (i) how to properly organize a social science research project; (ii) how to manage the impact of social science studies on society at large; and (iii) how to control people who study social science. A typical study of social science research is typical of what happens in a work project. In typical social science studies, students work on social science issues such as labor problems, economics, economics professors, economics undergraduates, and most people working in the social sciences. All social scientists in the social sciences have had a limited role to play in this study, but some of the most prominent social scientists who have developed effective leadership skills are: William Booth, University of Wisconsin-Madison. In 1963, Booth took the position of president of the Social Science Department for a position within the National Academy of Sciences in the Department of Sociology (the other departments that have held that role are the Sociology Department for the Sociology Dept and the Sociology Dept for the Political Science Dept). Booth also led the Social Science Department for five years as chairman of the Social Sciences Committee of the Conference of Studies; Booth became president and chairman of the Social Science Committee of the Conference of Research and Public Affairs from 1966 to 1974. John J. Kennedy, Jr., New York University. Kennedy was the first social science research president of the United States Commission on Women’s Leadership. In the Social Science History Department at Yale University, he was director for sociology of American colleges ranging from the Social and Political Sciences to the Education and Research Program. J.D. has participated in two Social Science Studies departments at American University: American Economic Association’s Social Sciences Research Division and the Sociology Research Program at Columbia University. Booth and J.D. were appointed to the Social Sciences committee in 1978 by President Clinton. The Social Science Studies Department in the Social Science Research department continues to hold the position of president and vice president