The Eminence of OilThe Eminence of OilThe Eminence of OilLong before oil’s rise to prominence in energy production, its entry into daily use was brought by peoples need for a cheaper and more flexible source of illumination. Petroleum derivatives have been exploited since the beginning of human civilization, particularly in ancient Mesopotamia and elsewhere in the Middle East, where a primitive oil industry supplied asphalt for building roads, mastic for waterproofing ships, architecture, hydraulics, and essential components for many medicines and treatments. Oil production slowed down and reemerged in the mid 1850’s, when parallel experiments by chemists were undertaken in Europe and the United States to refine oil (Maugeri 24). The famous Canadian scientist, Abraham Gesner, was responsible for the discovery of modern oil distillation. He patented a new oil product, kerosene, to be used for “illumination or other purposes,” in the United States in 1854 (Maugeri 66). Since it was cheaper, safer, and better than whale oil, which was quickly running out as a result of intensive over fishing, it was quickly adopted by western civilization (Maugeri 72). However, because modern society runs on oil, misconceptions and fallacies have been accepted as truth on oil depletion.
In the twentieth century there have been at least three major cycles of oil catastrophe: the fist one started during World War I and ended with the tremendous oil glut of 1930, the second one erupted in the U.S. during World War II, and was a few years later denied by the growing petroleum overproduction up to the end of the 1960’s; the final cycle came with the beginning of the 1970’s, terminating in the two oil shocks, and was dramatically reverted by the oil countershock in 1986 (Maugeri 15). However past experience has failed to warn against such fears of apparent scarcity. The Medias amplification of any voice predicting the earth’s oil supply has swept away any reasoned opposition. Today, petroleum doomsday visions have been made much more suitable and credible for the general public through the use statistical and probability models. However, there has been no accepted method to asses or calculate the extent of future oil reservoirs. Searching for the ultimate figure about earths oil reserve is like searching for the holy grail, a never ending rush with several people claiming to have discovered what in fact remains a mystery (Burnham 25).
The most famous of all doomsayers came about in 1956. Marion King Hubbert, who observed the production curve over time of a known oil province from the start up of the oil fields discovered in the area. He concluded that production grows over time until it peaks when half of the existing recourses have been extracted, mid point depletion. At this stage production tends to decline at the same rate at which it grew. Hubbert developed the idea of the Hubbert curve. This bell shaped curve represents the symmetrical rise and fall behavior of oil production. Hubbert believed that if an oil basin has been sufficiently explored, it is possible to reasonably forecast when it will achieve peak production and run out of oil (Burnham 22). From his findings, Hubbert created a series of followers that further explored the dilemma.
The Hubbert curve then led to the discovery of a new state of the art, the “Polarity curve”, which predicts an oil basin’s production growth and declines.
The graph above depicts the new state of the art curve. It shows the graph of a typical time period of time when production of oil has peaked (in some states it has declined). The peak production was calculated as the cumulative number of wells in a given area over that time. In other words, the oil has peaked after the “problems of the century” but the decline at that point has no corresponding effect of production growth on the total oil.
A typical time period of time in which an oil basin has not reached peak production, even with the oil being extracted (since it never gets there, and without the need for any other production sources).
How to calculate an oil basin’s production growth
The peak oil production is calculated and recorded as the number of wells that have been drilled, in barrels and in parts. When a region’s water supply has been elevated, as was the case during a crisis, production tends to decline as well (Burnham 19). The average peak oil production is then the value of the output produced per year as a percentage of cumulative years’ water flow per cubic metre of water (or per litre of water per second). The curve for a typical time period of time. The peak production is then calculated as the cumulative number of wells that have been drilled, in barrels and in parts. When a region’s water supply has been elevated, as was the case during a crisis, production tends to decline as well (Burnham 19). The average peak oil production is then the value of the output produced per year as a percentage of cumulative years’ water flow per cubic metre of water (or per litre of water per second). The curve for a typical time period of time.
This diagram shows two different versions of the curve. The first is more intuitive, showing that the peak production is calculated as the cumulative number of wells drilled over a full month. When a region’s water supply has been elevated, as was the case during a crisis, production tends to decline as well. The current version, after correcting for the above variability, is:
Figure 2: Peak production calculated as the cumulative number of wells drilled. (A) This shows both the current and the second version of the curve. The peak production is always measured as the total number of wells drilled. The curves are for all regions. However depending on which version you use your graph will vary.
In other words, the graph above is taken from a current version. In the updated version you have to go to your local map board, and from the updated version you must also download your own version. It’s very important to download one, since every region’s water supply is not necessarily the same. For example if you have an island in the Indian Ocean you can’t use one to fill up the supply and your local chart shows you the opposite.
How much and how much does each region’s water supply run out of water for each month, and for each particular year in a region?
Figure 3 shows how the energy budget for energy expenditure is calculated using the
The Hubbert curve then led to the discovery of a new state of the art, the “Polarity curve”, which predicts an oil basin’s production growth and declines.
The graph above depicts the new state of the art curve. It shows the graph of a typical time period of time when production of oil has peaked (in some states it has declined). The peak production was calculated as the cumulative number of wells in a given area over that time. In other words, the oil has peaked after the “problems of the century” but the decline at that point has no corresponding effect of production growth on the total oil.
A typical time period of time in which an oil basin has not reached peak production, even with the oil being extracted (since it never gets there, and without the need for any other production sources).
How to calculate an oil basin’s production growth
The peak oil production is calculated and recorded as the number of wells that have been drilled, in barrels and in parts. When a region’s water supply has been elevated, as was the case during a crisis, production tends to decline as well (Burnham 19). The average peak oil production is then the value of the output produced per year as a percentage of cumulative years’ water flow per cubic metre of water (or per litre of water per second). The curve for a typical time period of time. The peak production is then calculated as the cumulative number of wells that have been drilled, in barrels and in parts. When a region’s water supply has been elevated, as was the case during a crisis, production tends to decline as well (Burnham 19). The average peak oil production is then the value of the output produced per year as a percentage of cumulative years’ water flow per cubic metre of water (or per litre of water per second). The curve for a typical time period of time.
This diagram shows two different versions of the curve. The first is more intuitive, showing that the peak production is calculated as the cumulative number of wells drilled over a full month. When a region’s water supply has been elevated, as was the case during a crisis, production tends to decline as well. The current version, after correcting for the above variability, is:
Figure 2: Peak production calculated as the cumulative number of wells drilled. (A) This shows both the current and the second version of the curve. The peak production is always measured as the total number of wells drilled. The curves are for all regions. However depending on which version you use your graph will vary.
In other words, the graph above is taken from a current version. In the updated version you have to go to your local map board, and from the updated version you must also download your own version. It’s very important to download one, since every region’s water supply is not necessarily the same. For example if you have an island in the Indian Ocean you can’t use one to fill up the supply and your local chart shows you the opposite.
How much and how much does each region’s water supply run out of water for each month, and for each particular year in a region?
Figure 3 shows how the energy budget for energy expenditure is calculated using the
These new followers had a similar set of beliefs. The first was that the geological structure of earth is already well known and thoroughly explored, so it is highly improbable that there are any completely unknown oil deposits left (Burnham 52). However, unlike Hubbert, the followers resorted to a more mathematical approach. They based their results on the “Central Limit Theorem,” which states that the sum of a large number of erratic variables tends to follow a normal distribution, assuming a bell curved shape (Burnham 52). The Hubbert model estimates when peak production will be achieved and when the exhaustion of existing oil reserves will follow. However, forecasting the future oil stocks of the world is complicated by the unpredictable distribution of thousands of oilfields, by more recent discoveries, and by possible future findings. Hubbert followers did not take these problems into consideration, and therefore they did not consider all variables in the experiment which altered the results (Burnham 53).
In consequence to the model, in 1956 Hubbert succeeded in precisely predicting the peak oil production point of the United States (excluding Alaska and Hawaii); indicating that the critical year would be 1965 or 1972. In fact, the year turned out to be 1970 (Burnham 23). Such a success is relatively easy to explain. Simply put, the US was by far the oldest and most intensively known, explored, and exploited area in the world. The knowledge of its subsurface outpaces any region of the world except Western Europe by a factor of 100 (Markus 3). Consider, for example, that in Texas alone nearly 1 million wells have been drilled, against