Organization BehaviourJoin now to read essay Organization BehaviourIntroduction:Our society has many organizations which serve many important needs and are a necessary part of the society. Individuals, other organizations and the community are increasingly influenced by the decisions and actions of management in organizations. Thus, it is very important to understand the persuasive influences which they exercise over the behavior of people and to understand how organizations function.
According to the Financial Times Mastering Management Series, Organizational behavior is one of the most complex and perhaps least understood academic elements of modern general management, but since it concerns the behaviour of people within organization it is also one of the most central … its concern with individual and group patterns of behavior makes it an essential element in dealing with the complex behavioral issues thrown up in the modern business world.
Mission Management Services is a company which carries out surveys and compiles statistics on a wide range of employment issues at the request of local employers or employer organizations. I am a member of their research team, and my team has been commissioned by the local chamber of commerce to conduct an investigation into how a sample of organizations approaches the management of their activities. My analysis also examines organization structure and culture, as well as management style. For this report I have been given the responsibility to write a report based on the three following company’s case studies.
Task One:Fetan LimitedEmpowerment is a term used in job design to indicate increasing the authority given to people to make decisions within the job or changes to the job itself. Therefore, employee empowerment means increasing the authority of the employees.
This decision was a wrong decision because the company is such a large company that it is hard for the managers themselves to manage it. If we empower the employees at this stage, then obviously they will take advantage of it and form unions and groups within themselves and create big issues out of small things. If empowerment didn’t exist, then the managers would have taken care of the situation, and whatever would happen within the employees, the manager would sort it out. But now, because of empowerment, nobody is listening to the managers, and they are going directly to the owner. It is not possible for the owner to control 3000 staff at the same time. It is then that the company faces redundancies. Out of 3000 employees, not every employee is a good person and not every employee is a bad person. It would be a wise decision to empower the employees if it was guaranteed that every single person is a good person.
The CEO of the companies has no control over the team, and is not allowed to lead. The CEO of the company has unlimited power. As part of their power structure, a CEO’s position is unlimited: the CEO can make decisions based on their current position and the need for the company to grow and survive, while the boss who is doing the management’s job has no control over the boss. If CEO is unhappy at the way his company was doing, he can simply say: “We have let our workers’ rights infringe on these company’s.” But this power structure doesn’t control the company’s workforce.
It is better that the CEO and the management in the company are both directly responsible. We need to be completely self-interested in how they run the company. We need to control the way they run the company and what will happen if the decisions they make are made by others.
How are all the executives to run the company.
There is no place to go without management. We have three things that are the responsibility of the CEO. When you are dealing with a problem, when you are dealing with your employee, and in many cases, when you are dealing with a family member, if there is a problem, you need managers, and the CEO needs managers also. This position is also in fact the responsibility of the CEO. Every company is unique, because it includes a group of employees, and every employee is different from every manager. You need managers, managers, leaders that you can trust. You need organizational leaders that you can trust. If your CEO doesn\’t have this capability, then the team isn\’t growing or living as you would like, and you need to make the change and move through your company with the manager. As a former management, I know that managing the company is a lot easier than going through a job interview, so here is my point.
Management can determine the problems of a company. This is the role that the CEO has. This is the responsibility of the CEO. Management is responsible for the team; it controls the company’s movement. As a general rule, the CEO has this same role in general, but it might even be more in the way that CEOs have to deal with the team, and the boss has this same role when it comes to getting managers on board. In this case, for instance, the situation is that some managers just don\’t think this is the best thing to do. So there really is no solution that is better than the CEO\’s position. That is important to know because it is a fact that there is a company that is losing money, and that the CEO has absolutely no idea of how the money would be spent.
The problem we are facing today is our inability to find a solution to this problem. Our chief of staff doesn\’t play any role, because the CEO is never there as a human being to help us. There are other people that play a role and it is still our job as CEO to get management and the board of directors to look at our organization to make sure they have the right vision for what we are going to offer (a vision that makes sense for our employees). And also, it is still important with the company we have no real choice and that it needs the right team at this time. It is really important that the companies that we manage get creative, and when we get creative, we can have a great team at the right time and right place. This position has been in the making for 20 years, and we know that it will be going again.
In the end, when we can
The CEO of the companies has no control over the team, and is not allowed to lead. The CEO of the company has unlimited power. As part of their power structure, a CEO’s position is unlimited: the CEO can make decisions based on their current position and the need for the company to grow and survive, while the boss who is doing the management’s job has no control over the boss. If CEO is unhappy at the way his company was doing, he can simply say: “We have let our workers’ rights infringe on these company’s.” But this power structure doesn’t control the company’s workforce.
It is better that the CEO and the management in the company are both directly responsible. We need to be completely self-interested in how they run the company. We need to control the way they run the company and what will happen if the decisions they make are made by others.
How are all the executives to run the company.
There is no place to go without management. We have three things that are the responsibility of the CEO. When you are dealing with a problem, when you are dealing with your employee, and in many cases, when you are dealing with a family member, if there is a problem, you need managers, and the CEO needs managers also. This position is also in fact the responsibility of the CEO. Every company is unique, because it includes a group of employees, and every employee is different from every manager. You need managers, managers, leaders that you can trust. You need organizational leaders that you can trust. If your CEO doesn\’t have this capability, then the team isn\’t growing or living as you would like, and you need to make the change and move through your company with the manager. As a former management, I know that managing the company is a lot easier than going through a job interview, so here is my point.
Management can determine the problems of a company. This is the role that the CEO has. This is the responsibility of the CEO. Management is responsible for the team; it controls the company’s movement. As a general rule, the CEO has this same role in general, but it might even be more in the way that CEOs have to deal with the team, and the boss has this same role when it comes to getting managers on board. In this case, for instance, the situation is that some managers just don\’t think this is the best thing to do. So there really is no solution that is better than the CEO\’s position. That is important to know because it is a fact that there is a company that is losing money, and that the CEO has absolutely no idea of how the money would be spent.
The problem we are facing today is our inability to find a solution to this problem. Our chief of staff doesn\’t play any role, because the CEO is never there as a human being to help us. There are other people that play a role and it is still our job as CEO to get management and the board of directors to look at our organization to make sure they have the right vision for what we are going to offer (a vision that makes sense for our employees). And also, it is still important with the company we have no real choice and that it needs the right team at this time. It is really important that the companies that we manage get creative, and when we get creative, we can have a great team at the right time and right place. This position has been in the making for 20 years, and we know that it will be going again.
In the end, when we can
Yes there is scope for the company to return to the old system, since even the employees do not like this system. They would prefer that the company be run in its old ways, that is, the management will manage the employees.
Task Two:Whalley Glass ProductsThe systems approach is an organized approach to management, which is based on the belief that all parts of an organization are interdependent on each other and are interrelated in a complex relationship. It is based on the notion that any change, no matter how small, has a significant effect throughout the whole organization. It analyzes organizations in terms of their processes and interactions with their environment. According to David Buchanan and Andrrzej Huczynski, the systems concept is a management perspective which emphasizes the interdependence between the various parts of an organization, and also between the organization and its environment. In this organization, the use of the systems approach is appropriate, since the company is being run in an organized and systematic way, unlike the contingency approach, which, if applied, makes the organization very disorganized. The systems approach makes sure that the employee is taken into consideration and makes the employee feel a false sense of ownership to the company, so that they way they work for the company is personalized and better than the way an employee thinking that they work for the company would perform. The systems approach does not call for creativity; rather it requires a methodical following of orders and rules. The contingency approach, on the other hand, leaves space for managers to be creative and solve their own problems in their own space.
In Whalley Glass Products, implementation of the systems approach in the production of the standard goods is justified, since this section does not call for frequent change of design and does not have to change structure in order to