Music And TechnologyEssay Preview: Music And TechnologyReport this essayAdvancements in todays technology have allowed users to access and use computer programs, movies, music and other multimedia for which they have not purchased. Technological advancements are coming along at such a quick pace that the enforcement of copyright laws cannot keep pace. Music piracy exploded in the late 1990s and caused groups such as the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) to crack down on companies such as Napster that provided that provided free music downloads. The number of lawsuits against individuals who illegally download music has escalated to the point that people are now switching to legal internet sites that sell music downloads. The ethicality of this issue has touched many people throughout the world while the legality of file sharing is a widely debated topic in the courts and music industry.
| Table of Contents |
In the book, Professor John P. Blaine and Professor Chris Grayling explain how the concept of copyright, and the ways that certain types of internet media will play into the new era of technological innovation, are changing and will require more of the protection afforded by traditional copyright law. What are the benefits and potential risks of these changes? What do they mean for today’s emerging digital economy? It is important to note that these changes will be made without regard for the inherent limitations of copyright that may exist in today’s current digital era. In addition, although the benefits and risks that the new legal order would bring may require some change in legal practice or practice practices, it is likely that these changes would do little to help or discourage a shift to law enforcement which is often more difficult, perhaps even downright dangerous. Blaine and Grayling, who are both academics in the Department of Economic and Management Administration, the US Department of Justice and the Computer and Communications Industry Organization, are also distinguished internationally, where they are senior editors of The Electronic Music Group, the digital music journal. Their book will appear in the November 2007 issue of Popular Culture. For more information, please visit: http://academic.plata.org/~mstell
There are various laws that govern copyright practice. These laws are in place to protect the rights of artists while preserving the publics right to benefit from the works of those same artists. The foundation for copyright law in the U.S. is based on the Copyright Act of 1976, a federal statute that went into effect on January 1, 1978. This law protects copyright owners from the unauthorized reproduction, adaptation, performance, display or distribution of their copyright protected works. Anyone who violates any of the exclusive rights of a copyright owner is an infringer. A copyright owner can recover actual or, in some cases, statutory damages from an infringer. Other federal laws protecting against copyright infringement include the Federal Anti-Bootleg Statute, Fair Use Doctrine, and The Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act.
The Federal Anti-Bootleg Statute specifically protects against the unauthorized activities such as the distribution of sound recordings and recordings of live performances. The Fair Use Doctrine allows citizens to cite copyrighted materials for uses such as teaching and research. The Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act extends the U.S. copyright from life plus 50 years to life plus 70 years. Individual states also have laws protecting against copyright infringement and piracy, but they mirror the federal laws.
There are also a number of international copyright laws. These include The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, the Rome Convention, the Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (The TRIPS Agreement), The World Intellectual Property Organization Copyright Treaty (WCT) and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT). These international laws do not form an international copyright law but most countries have agreed upon the most basic terms of copyright protection. These laws set the minimum standard of copyright protection worldwide. They also make it easier to fight the piracy of American products in other countries.
There are several laws that deal specifically with digital music. One such law is The Audio Home Recording Act of 1992 (AHRA). This law more or less protects the makers of devices, such as audio cassette players and minidisk players, used to make digital music recordings. The producers of these products must register with the copyright office, pay a royalty on each device they sell, and include software on each device that restricts the ability to make copies of copies. The manufacturers of these devices are then protected against infringement when consumers use the product illegally. Another law dealing with digital music is The Digital Performance Right in Sound Recordings Act of 1995. This law gives owners of copyrighted material the right to authorize public performances of their work. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) originated in the 1996 World Intellectual Property Organizations Diplomatic conference in Geneva. This law helps to meet standards set forth in the treaties mentioned in the various international laws. The DMCA prohibits the manufacture and distribution of devices designed for the sole purpose of undermining technology used to protect copyrighted works. This law also places responsibilities on internet service providers (ISPs). When an ISP becomes aware that it is posting or transmitting infringing content, it must remove the copyrighted works or face legal punishments. The No Electronic Theft Law (NET Act) states that sound recording infringements (including those by digital means) can be criminally prosecuted even where no monetary profit or commercial gain is derived from the infringing activity. The NET Act specifically mentions the illegality of receiving copyrighted works as in MP3 trading. Violators can face up to five years in prison and/or $250,000 in fines and also face civil charges (RIAA, 2003).
Downloading music from the internet is very popular today. Before pay-based websites such as iTunes and Apple Music, downloading music from the internet was made possible by companies such as Napster. Napster maintained an index of members music and allowed members to download music files for free. After Napster was sued by the RIAA and the courts forced the company to shut down its free music sharing business, services such as Morpheus, Limewire, and Kazaa allowed users to download free software enabling them to connect with other users using peer-to-peer computing. This software connects users together over the internet. Users upload their music library into a shared file allowing other users to copy those music files on their computers. Peer-to-peer networks quickly gained popularity and soon millions of users were sharing songs. Nearly any song imaginable can be found on these networks.
With the possible threat of lawsuits hanging over file-traders, many are looking for ways to download and share music without getting caught. The Russian website, Allofmp3.com, may be what music downloaders are looking for. This company claims to have ownership of Russian music distribution rights. At five cents per song, users can download any song without uploading songs to share. Most of the personal lawsuits are against uploaders and not downloaders. If the RIAA would decide to start going after downloaders they would need to convince the Russian authorities to crack down on music sharing companies (Mulhauser, 2005). Recently, the U. S. Senate and the House passed a resolution that threatens to not let Russia join the World Trade Organization (RIAA, 2005). One would think that Russia just might cooperate in this situation.
In December 1999, the RIAA sued Napster for violating copyright laws. The courts ordered Napster to stop allowing users to download copyrighted material. Napster subsequently shut down its service and filed bankruptcy, giving rise to peer-to-peer computing. The major recording companies filed a lawsuit against two companies offering peer-to-peer software