Essay On Hughes V Metropolitan Railway Co

Essay About Hughes V Metropolitan Railway Co And High Trees Case
Pages • 3

Promissory Estoppel Rules of Application Pre existing contractual relationship Promisor made clear that he would enforce his leagal rights Promisee acted in reliance to the promise It is inequitable for the promisor to go back on the promise Used as shield not sword does not create new action Combe v Combe Suspends promisors rights but.

Weve found 1 essay examples on Hughes V Metropolitan Railway Co