Plessy Vs. Ferguson Essay Preview: Plessy Vs. Ferguson Report this essay Plessy went to court and argued that the Separate Car Act violated the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution. The judge, a Massachusetts lawyer, was John Howard Ferguson. He had previously declared the Separate Car Act “unconstitutional on trains that traveled through several.
Plessy Vs. Ferguson TrialEssay Preview: Plessy Vs. Ferguson TrialReport this essayLouisiana passed a statute that made it mandatory that trains provide “equal but separate accommodations for the white and colored races” in 1890. The fine for breaking this statute was a $25 fine or 20 days in jail. Homer Plessey a colored 30 year old.
Plessy V Ferguson Essay title: Plessy V Ferguson Background: In1890 a Louisiana law commanded the railroad to “provide equal but separate accommodations for the white and colored races.” Violation of this law carried a fine of $20 or 25 days in jail. Railway personnel were responsible for assigning seats according to race. Homer Plessy, who.
