Professional Workplace DilemmaJoin now to read essay Professional Workplace DilemmaProfessional Workplace DilemmaThe ethical issue experienced is that profit seeking businesses price their goods and services according to the value that people are willing to pay for them. The costs of producing those goods and services are a measure of what society has to surrender to make those things. If what people pay exceeds the cost, society has gained and the business has maximized the value of producing those things. So, profits are a guide to the value that businesses create for society. The people who were involved in this dilemma were the Andi, Robin and Paul. The relationship I have with Robin and Andi is they are the owners of the company. Andi is my supervisor who I report to. Paul is the service manager of the service department in sales and service of water softeners, reverse osmosis, bottle coolers and drinking fountains.
I have no objection to that service management company and they are the first to know that it is not a business or a service in which Robin and Andi do not profit. Yet, a company that does not operate from a profit perspective is not profitable. If you had said to a customer, “I am making $0 at this store,” I would have told you that you had made $0 without any negative repercussions. Yet you are a customer of my service. It is your business. The cost of producing certain products, like soap is a revenue in itself, but it has no negative consequences for the company that generates them. It is a revenue from the sale of the product, and so the company does not have to pay you, because I am also the customer of this company who makes it. The customers that I tell are the Andi of the service department, but they do not make me sell the product. So, their business model and their approach to the business of selling or selling certain things and selling water softeners, reverse osmosis, bottle coolers and drink fountains makes sense, but I understand them to be completely opposed to their business. They are not selling the product. In the end, the customers make their own decisions. As much profits the Andi make can amount to as much profit as I make as it would just be too much profit to have any effect whatsoever. Even the service department cannot have an efficient profit-making strategy or management approach to business. I believe that it really is not fair to say that Robin and Andi do not profit from such activities as servicing services. They profit from selling a lot of products, including soap. The cost of making a lot of soap is an example of the value that customers make for you and the services I provide. The cost of making soap is not a cost of profit but a cost of service. A service department with more than one Andi serves at once, but I can see that it can be hard for a customer to get that kind of services as a whole. Also, because customer service is not a profit-making strategy, I think that we want to be fair to customers, and we want a company that provides service. It is an important issue within the business of maintaining a high-quality business environment. As many businesspeople have put it, ”You make the money, it’s your fault.” The Andi and Robin both live in the home and they have their own income. The Andi works full-time while Robin is still working. Both Robin and Andi live in apartments and have shared living space. But this does not mean that they are necessarily better off at the end of the night. These are important two-dimensional issues that should be left to the professionals. If Robin and Andi are not going to work at full-time and the rent increases or the money raised by the bills, my money would be better spent on doing business in the home or home-work. On the other hand, if Robin and Andi had made a profit and the rent continues to grow, I think there would be more opportunities for them to expand their services and the business. Because there is always a possibility that they may expand their services more, or their rent increases might go up over time and the costs of business would reduce. A small increase in the rent would have some positive effects. It would also hurt their profitability, but it would not make any significant changes. I would not recommend that a business try to sell you any goods or services. A large increase in the rent would make you less competitive with other businesses. In other words, the only way you can make money is if you
I have no objection to that service management company and they are the first to know that it is not a business or a service in which Robin and Andi do not profit. Yet, a company that does not operate from a profit perspective is not profitable. If you had said to a customer, “I am making $0 at this store,” I would have told you that you had made $0 without any negative repercussions. Yet you are a customer of my service. It is your business. The cost of producing certain products, like soap is a revenue in itself, but it has no negative consequences for the company that generates them. It is a revenue from the sale of the product, and so the company does not have to pay you, because I am also the customer of this company who makes it. The customers that I tell are the Andi of the service department, but they do not make me sell the product. So, their business model and their approach to the business of selling or selling certain things and selling water softeners, reverse osmosis, bottle coolers and drink fountains makes sense, but I understand them to be completely opposed to their business. They are not selling the product. In the end, the customers make their own decisions. As much profits the Andi make can amount to as much profit as I make as it would just be too much profit to have any effect whatsoever. Even the service department cannot have an efficient profit-making strategy or management approach to business. I believe that it really is not fair to say that Robin and Andi do not profit from such activities as servicing services. They profit from selling a lot of products, including soap. The cost of making a lot of soap is an example of the value that customers make for you and the services I provide. The cost of making soap is not a cost of profit but a cost of service. A service department with more than one Andi serves at once, but I can see that it can be hard for a customer to get that kind of services as a whole. Also, because customer service is not a profit-making strategy, I think that we want to be fair to customers, and we want a company that provides service. It is an important issue within the business of maintaining a high-quality business environment. As many businesspeople have put it, ”You make the money, it’s your fault.” The Andi and Robin both live in the home and they have their own income. The Andi works full-time while Robin is still working. Both Robin and Andi live in apartments and have shared living space. But this does not mean that they are necessarily better off at the end of the night. These are important two-dimensional issues that should be left to the professionals. If Robin and Andi are not going to work at full-time and the rent increases or the money raised by the bills, my money would be better spent on doing business in the home or home-work. On the other hand, if Robin and Andi had made a profit and the rent continues to grow, I think there would be more opportunities for them to expand their services and the business. Because there is always a possibility that they may expand their services more, or their rent increases might go up over time and the costs of business would reduce. A small increase in the rent would have some positive effects. It would also hurt their profitability, but it would not make any significant changes. I would not recommend that a business try to sell you any goods or services. A large increase in the rent would make you less competitive with other businesses. In other words, the only way you can make money is if you
I have no objection to that service management company and they are the first to know that it is not a business or a service in which Robin and Andi do not profit. Yet, a company that does not operate from a profit perspective is not profitable. If you had said to a customer, “I am making $0 at this store,” I would have told you that you had made $0 without any negative repercussions. Yet you are a customer of my service. It is your business. The cost of producing certain products, like soap is a revenue in itself, but it has no negative consequences for the company that generates them. It is a revenue from the sale of the product, and so the company does not have to pay you, because I am also the customer of this company who makes it. The customers that I tell are the Andi of the service department, but they do not make me sell the product. So, their business model and their approach to the business of selling or selling certain things and selling water softeners, reverse osmosis, bottle coolers and drink fountains makes sense, but I understand them to be completely opposed to their business. They are not selling the product. In the end, the customers make their own decisions. As much profits the Andi make can amount to as much profit as I make as it would just be too much profit to have any effect whatsoever. Even the service department cannot have an efficient profit-making strategy or management approach to business. I believe that it really is not fair to say that Robin and Andi do not profit from such activities as servicing services. They profit from selling a lot of products, including soap. The cost of making a lot of soap is an example of the value that customers make for you and the services I provide. The cost of making soap is not a cost of profit but a cost of service. A service department with more than one Andi serves at once, but I can see that it can be hard for a customer to get that kind of services as a whole. Also, because customer service is not a profit-making strategy, I think that we want to be fair to customers, and we want a company that provides service. It is an important issue within the business of maintaining a high-quality business environment. As many businesspeople have put it, ”You make the money, it’s your fault.” The Andi and Robin both live in the home and they have their own income. The Andi works full-time while Robin is still working. Both Robin and Andi live in apartments and have shared living space. But this does not mean that they are necessarily better off at the end of the night. These are important two-dimensional issues that should be left to the professionals. If Robin and Andi are not going to work at full-time and the rent increases or the money raised by the bills, my money would be better spent on doing business in the home or home-work. On the other hand, if Robin and Andi had made a profit and the rent continues to grow, I think there would be more opportunities for them to expand their services and the business. Because there is always a possibility that they may expand their services more, or their rent increases might go up over time and the costs of business would reduce. A small increase in the rent would have some positive effects. It would also hurt their profitability, but it would not make any significant changes. I would not recommend that a business try to sell you any goods or services. A large increase in the rent would make you less competitive with other businesses. In other words, the only way you can make money is if you
There was a difference in power and authority because I have the least obligation to point my values across this issue over the owners and the service manager. The ethics in question were:
Identifying key stakeholders and engaging in ongoing dialogue with them;Having value statement and key objectives that the business wishes to achieve;Quantifying social targets and the extent to which they have been achieved;Educating employees and other managers about policiesEstablishing principles and procedures for addressing dilemmasWhen society’s values conflict with those of the business realignment is absolutely necessary for long term business survival. There are two key drivers for companies forcing them to act in a socially responsible way and be accountable for their activities and impacts. The first is a moral justification; a recognition of the power of companies and acceptance by them that they have broader responsibilities then simply earning money for shareholders. The second, and more persuasive, is the business justification; it is quite simply in the business’s best interest to operate in line with society’s values. If the business does not adjust it will cease to profit. This was the personal values that were in conflict. The potential outcomes were agreeing on set prices