Ethics Case
Although many ethical theories have some similarities within each other that can cause each of them to coincide, there are also so differences. When comparing the different types of ethical theories, one may find that there are many differences which should be taken in to consideration. This paper will identify some of the differences between virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics.
The virtue theory is solely based on the judgment of an individual based on his or her character. As Gao (2010) sasid, “Virtue constantly struggles with the necessary evil in human nature, not self-love or desire.” (p.274). This type of theory takes someone’s reputation into consideration when determining a conclusion on a proposed matter. Unlike utilitarianism and deontological ethics, virtue theory is not based on the outcome of a situation, but is based on a prior outcome.
Utilitarianism also has its differences. Utilitarianism is solely based on the prediction of a consequence to an action. A utilitarian identifies the different consequences to his or her actions and determines the best situation for everyone involved. Therefore, utilitarianism is different than deontological ethics and virtue theory because it does not focus on the outcome for an individual, but for a group as a whole.
Finally, deontological theory is different than virtue theory and utilitarianism because there is no rationale behind this way of thinking. Deontologist must keep their word to others which can be a very big flaw in some circumstances. Deontologists must always keep their word which can affect many others involved, making it different.
In conclusion, every ethical theory has its advantages and disadvantages, but can all serve a purpose in our everyday lives. We all make decisions based on judgments, past results and or future outcomes. Personally I have been in situations where I have used virtue theories, deontological ethics, and utilitarianism