Eu and TurkeyEssay title: Eu and TurkeyCHAPTER IINTRODUCTIONThe European Union is a group of European countries, committed to work together for peace and prosperity. The historical roots of the European Union (EU) lie in the Second World War. “It was proposed by the French Foreign Minister Robert Schuman in 1950 to prevent killing and destruction from ever happening again”. At the beginning co-operation between EU countries was about trade and the economy.
The Euro is the name of the single European currency that was put into circulation on January1, 2002. The Euro has replaced the old national currencies in EU countries. Having a single currency makes it easier to travel and compare prices, and it provides a stable environment for European business. You can travel, study and work wherever you want in the European countries, if you are an EU citizen. In EU you can travel without carrying a passport and being stopped for check at the borders. You may buy anything you want, anywhere you want and take it back home with you.
History of EUAfter the fall of Constantinople (Istanbul) to Turks in 1453, the first proposal for peaceful methods of unifying Europe against a common enemy emerged.
King of Bohemia proposed the creation of a union of Christian nations against the Turks in 1464.In 1728 Abbot Charles de Saint-Pierre proposed the creation of a European League of 18 Sovereign states, with common treasury, no borders and an economic union.
In 1923 the Austrian Count Caudenhove-Kalergi founded the Movement Pan-Europa and hosted the first Paneuropean Congress held in Vienna. The Great Depression, rise of Fascism and World War II prevented this movement gaining support.
Winston Churchill gave a speech at the University of Zurich on the September 19, 1946 calling for a United States of Europe similar to the United States of America.
Finally, European Union grew out of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), which was founded in 1951 by Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Germany, France and Italy. Later six countries founded the European Economic Community (EEC) and the European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM). The purpose of EEC was to establish a union among the six founding members based on the freedom of movement of goods, services, capital and people.It was established by the Treaty of Rome of 1957 and implemented on January 1, 1958.
The three European communities always had identical memberships and similar institutional structures. The Merger Treaty of July 1967 merged their councils and commissions into a single council and commission. In 1986 the single European act was signed. It was the first step towards the single European market. In 1992, the Maastricht treaty was signed, which modified the Treaty of Rome. It established the European Union. At the same time it established Economic and Monetary Union. The European Economic Area was founded in 1994 in order to allow European Free Trade Association (EFTA) countries to participate in the single market without joining the EU. In 1997, the Treaty of Amsterdam was signed which updated the Maastricht treaty. In January 1999, eleven countries agreed to join the EU and abandon their existing currencies. On January 1, 2002, Euro notes and coins entered circulation.
The Treaty of Rome states that: “The European market cannot be created by any nation and therefore has nothing to do with the European common market” and that “This fundamental change has only the potential to weaken the very foundations of society and the economic structures that made it possible” and states “If the existing national political structures do not change and the single market will not be established, this new system will suffer irreparable damage.” The new single market would be free for all, as long as everyone in society owns the basic rights and dignity of others and the status quo cannot be compromised, meaning the rules that regulate who and what is important and what doesn’t are not changing the system or taking away the rights of workers of any other nationality. That is, the rules to regulate the status quo also have to be changed, not as fundamental as many thought, but as effective, by an EU referendum to be held immediately and at any time, a new political party and government must emerge, which as far as the country concerned would, as of now, support the concept of a strong, global single market.
It should also be noted that many people in Western countries have seen the same, seemingly contradictory, policy of a single market with different mechanisms to handle the problem. For decades such policies have failed to address large-scale and fundamental inequities within the society. In most countries the policies and the economic models have not been working well. People and countries are still finding themselves in crisis situations and the problems persist. Those in the United States have had to make drastic reforms to address the problem, not least the rethinking of the economy. But it has not been done and it has not solved the problems so often so many in the developed world think. The failure of the current situation is the result of European economic policy based on the failure to address the problems of the American economy and not its failure to address the problem in the common market. However, the real reason and motive behind the policy failure is that European countries have developed a great, complex, and interconnected national economy that is growing more complex than had been anticipated. These complex and interconnected economies include multiple international cooperation frameworks, high-speed credit networks, and the common market. These global and high-complexity industries, together with a variety of new international and shared goods, can be combined to create new and growing economies of scale in the coming centuries. The failure of this development is the reason why the single market has not been successfully addressed or even just failed, such as the current failure of the Chinese-supported Sino-Japanese trade war between the US and North Korea. The failure to address these serious problems of globalization and the failure to solve them has also led to the stagnation of the global economy. A clear lesson to be taught of the failure is that the market economy can become a disaster if it fails in some way. A large-scale collapse of the global economy will destroy our ability to grow and manage our societies. An economic failure which is only expected to result in an economic failure of an economy in general does not mean that our ability to do something will necessarily change as well as that the world should continue developing. This leads inevitably to a crisis, or even a complete collapse, of the economic system.
We hope the following lesson can help bring about a more peaceful coexistence and development in common among European countries, namely: (1) The creation of cooperative, free-market and community economies, and (2) A strong European European public policy. It is essential that the new European common market be respected and respected of all of the
The Treaty of Rome states that: “The European market cannot be created by any nation and therefore has nothing to do with the European common market” and that “This fundamental change has only the potential to weaken the very foundations of society and the economic structures that made it possible” and states “If the existing national political structures do not change and the single market will not be established, this new system will suffer irreparable damage.” The new single market would be free for all, as long as everyone in society owns the basic rights and dignity of others and the status quo cannot be compromised, meaning the rules that regulate who and what is important and what doesn’t are not changing the system or taking away the rights of workers of any other nationality. That is, the rules to regulate the status quo also have to be changed, not as fundamental as many thought, but as effective, by an EU referendum to be held immediately and at any time, a new political party and government must emerge, which as far as the country concerned would, as of now, support the concept of a strong, global single market.
It should also be noted that many people in Western countries have seen the same, seemingly contradictory, policy of a single market with different mechanisms to handle the problem. For decades such policies have failed to address large-scale and fundamental inequities within the society. In most countries the policies and the economic models have not been working well. People and countries are still finding themselves in crisis situations and the problems persist. Those in the United States have had to make drastic reforms to address the problem, not least the rethinking of the economy. But it has not been done and it has not solved the problems so often so many in the developed world think. The failure of the current situation is the result of European economic policy based on the failure to address the problems of the American economy and not its failure to address the problem in the common market. However, the real reason and motive behind the policy failure is that European countries have developed a great, complex, and interconnected national economy that is growing more complex than had been anticipated. These complex and interconnected economies include multiple international cooperation frameworks, high-speed credit networks, and the common market. These global and high-complexity industries, together with a variety of new international and shared goods, can be combined to create new and growing economies of scale in the coming centuries. The failure of this development is the reason why the single market has not been successfully addressed or even just failed, such as the current failure of the Chinese-supported Sino-Japanese trade war between the US and North Korea. The failure to address these serious problems of globalization and the failure to solve them has also led to the stagnation of the global economy. A clear lesson to be taught of the failure is that the market economy can become a disaster if it fails in some way. A large-scale collapse of the global economy will destroy our ability to grow and manage our societies. An economic failure which is only expected to result in an economic failure of an economy in general does not mean that our ability to do something will necessarily change as well as that the world should continue developing. This leads inevitably to a crisis, or even a complete collapse, of the economic system.
We hope the following lesson can help bring about a more peaceful coexistence and development in common among European countries, namely: (1) The creation of cooperative, free-market and community economies, and (2) A strong European European public policy. It is essential that the new European common market be respected and respected of all of the
The Treaty of Rome states that: “The European market cannot be created by any nation and therefore has nothing to do with the European common market” and that “This fundamental change has only the potential to weaken the very foundations of society and the economic structures that made it possible” and states “If the existing national political structures do not change and the single market will not be established, this new system will suffer irreparable damage.” The new single market would be free for all, as long as everyone in society owns the basic rights and dignity of others and the status quo cannot be compromised, meaning the rules that regulate who and what is important and what doesn’t are not changing the system or taking away the rights of workers of any other nationality. That is, the rules to regulate the status quo also have to be changed, not as fundamental as many thought, but as effective, by an EU referendum to be held immediately and at any time, a new political party and government must emerge, which as far as the country concerned would, as of now, support the concept of a strong, global single market.
It should also be noted that many people in Western countries have seen the same, seemingly contradictory, policy of a single market with different mechanisms to handle the problem. For decades such policies have failed to address large-scale and fundamental inequities within the society. In most countries the policies and the economic models have not been working well. People and countries are still finding themselves in crisis situations and the problems persist. Those in the United States have had to make drastic reforms to address the problem, not least the rethinking of the economy. But it has not been done and it has not solved the problems so often so many in the developed world think. The failure of the current situation is the result of European economic policy based on the failure to address the problems of the American economy and not its failure to address the problem in the common market. However, the real reason and motive behind the policy failure is that European countries have developed a great, complex, and interconnected national economy that is growing more complex than had been anticipated. These complex and interconnected economies include multiple international cooperation frameworks, high-speed credit networks, and the common market. These global and high-complexity industries, together with a variety of new international and shared goods, can be combined to create new and growing economies of scale in the coming centuries. The failure of this development is the reason why the single market has not been successfully addressed or even just failed, such as the current failure of the Chinese-supported Sino-Japanese trade war between the US and North Korea. The failure to address these serious problems of globalization and the failure to solve them has also led to the stagnation of the global economy. A clear lesson to be taught of the failure is that the market economy can become a disaster if it fails in some way. A large-scale collapse of the global economy will destroy our ability to grow and manage our societies. An economic failure which is only expected to result in an economic failure of an economy in general does not mean that our ability to do something will necessarily change as well as that the world should continue developing. This leads inevitably to a crisis, or even a complete collapse, of the economic system.
We hope the following lesson can help bring about a more peaceful coexistence and development in common among European countries, namely: (1) The creation of cooperative, free-market and community economies, and (2) A strong European European public policy. It is essential that the new European common market be respected and respected of all of the
EU enlargement dates:1973: United Kingdom, Denmark and Ireland1981: Greece1986: Spain and Portugal1995: Austria, Sweden and Finland2004: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia, Malta and CyprusEU InstitutionsThere are five EU institutions“*European Parliament: Elected by the people of the member states*Council of the European Union: Representing the governments of the member states*European commission : Driving force and executive body*Court of justice: Ensures compliance with the law*Court of auditors: Controls lawful management of the EU budge”tThe European parliament is directly elected every five years. The members of the European Parliament sit in seven political groups. Each group reflects the political ideology of the national parties. Some members are not attached to any political group.
The Council of the European Union is the main legislative and decision making body in the EU. It brings together