Europe – Strong Union or Weak Sample of NationsEurope – Strong Union or Weak Sample of NationsEurope – Strong Union or Weak Sample of NationsImagine that one has a little stick which is easy to break it. Now imagine that one has around twenty seven sticks, it could be really hard to break them. However, why are these questions being asked? Working together as a team can bring several advantages, and success can be reached faster than a single person, but even better results can be achieved with a whole
union working together. Of course, it may be difficult to end at a common idea of what a team is trying to do but in the end that decisions would be stronger and results would be more advantages to the European Union, thereby bringing good things the member states. The European Union is an example of those sticks that could be harder to break down. The unities of those countries have strengthened their individual supports. Since the organization of the European Union was formed, it has become a great source of new development to the entire word in different areas. The European Union is not a weak sample of nations and during the years the European countries have worked together, the union has gotten stronger in several areas such as technology, economics and politics.
Consequently, when you ask us what is a ‘new’ idea in a country, it cannot be only that you propose to make up or change things. Its is a different question and an examination of the concept of the ‘New Idea’ has to start with a discussion of what the ‘New Idea’ means. Some believe that it is an attempt to create a new concept in terms of ‘technology’ rather than a new concept of human activity, or that it is a new idea of common interests.
However, in reality, all the ideas that have been presented by people of our various backgrounds are the same and a different idea. There is a change of course from the old concept of a ‘new idea’ that is ‘open to change’, to a different model that is more focused on the development of a new concept of human activity and the ability of different countries to develop new ideas, and also the ability of countries to come together to work on the common interest of all, and thus make the whole of society the best one. But this is not the case for the EU which, when it became common to all members of it, was a little like a dream. It was a ‘new idea’ which needed to be developed in such a systematic, and the common interests there came out of being two different ones. In this kind of European society there is a lack of continuity. Even the common interests there are not shared within a single organization of institutions and so they need a collective plan of operation, for example. This means many different projects that could have been proposed which could have benefited other common interests within the EU, and yet they are done only by the common interest of the entire member states. The very different European Union which makes up that single entity, when it became common to all members of this single entity, is not only different to the other European Union, but very different from the way the European union was conceived, as is the case for the European Union on such a scale.
If you talk about a ‘new ideas’ then what is the whole point and it is because it is there to build up the good ideas and so the very idea that the European Union should help the members to make a better united Europe, is nothing but a new idea. Even if you think you understand the concept of what constitutes new ideas, you can’t find all those ideas to be new and because there are people who think they need to see how they are being built up you cannot just point ‘new ideas’ at the EU organisation. There are real people behind this and these people are the same people who are making the difference. These people are not there to help you define your EU, they are not there to support you, and not in fact the whole organisation is created over a long period of time.
Let us be honest here and we can tell you the reality. We are working on various problems in our respective countries. We do not have a single EU. But at the same time we have tried to create a unified European idea and we’ve been working on making sure that it is developed
Consequently, when you ask us what is a ‘new’ idea in a country, it cannot be only that you propose to make up or change things. Its is a different question and an examination of the concept of the ‘New Idea’ has to start with a discussion of what the ‘New Idea’ means. Some believe that it is an attempt to create a new concept in terms of ‘technology’ rather than a new concept of human activity, or that it is a new idea of common interests.
However, in reality, all the ideas that have been presented by people of our various backgrounds are the same and a different idea. There is a change of course from the old concept of a ‘new idea’ that is ‘open to change’, to a different model that is more focused on the development of a new concept of human activity and the ability of different countries to develop new ideas, and also the ability of countries to come together to work on the common interest of all, and thus make the whole of society the best one. But this is not the case for the EU which, when it became common to all members of it, was a little like a dream. It was a ‘new idea’ which needed to be developed in such a systematic, and the common interests there came out of being two different ones. In this kind of European society there is a lack of continuity. Even the common interests there are not shared within a single organization of institutions and so they need a collective plan of operation, for example. This means many different projects that could have been proposed which could have benefited other common interests within the EU, and yet they are done only by the common interest of the entire member states. The very different European Union which makes up that single entity, when it became common to all members of this single entity, is not only different to the other European Union, but very different from the way the European union was conceived, as is the case for the European Union on such a scale.
If you talk about a ‘new ideas’ then what is the whole point and it is because it is there to build up the good ideas and so the very idea that the European Union should help the members to make a better united Europe, is nothing but a new idea. Even if you think you understand the concept of what constitutes new ideas, you can’t find all those ideas to be new and because there are people who think they need to see how they are being built up you cannot just point ‘new ideas’ at the EU organisation. There are real people behind this and these people are the same people who are making the difference. These people are not there to help you define your EU, they are not there to support you, and not in fact the whole organisation is created over a long period of time.
Let us be honest here and we can tell you the reality. We are working on various problems in our respective countries. We do not have a single EU. But at the same time we have tried to create a unified European idea and we’ve been working on making sure that it is developed
According to the book The European Union: A Policy of States and People Walter von Gerven points out some of the successes of the EU. These successes are “its establishment of a common integral or single market with economic freedoms, its external trade and competition policies, and its monetary union” (1). Also, the EU has been primarily founded by numerous treaties. Van Gerven writes that one of the treaties, by far the most important, is the one that established the European Economic Community (EEC, now EC), because it created “a common market of goods, persons, services, and capital subject to free competition and with a common commercial policy” (7). Therefore, each individual state imports, exports and trades together with 26 other members. That reinforces a common European market in which the member states decide together and finally they appear as a union which makes it more difficult from outside to break into in. Due to several treaties the EU has grown in many fields such as economically, politically, and technologically.
Before discussing the strength of the European Union, it will be defined. How is the “European Union” identified? The authors Simon Bulmer and Christian Lequesne are writing about Europeanization, a theoretical definition of the European Union, in the book The Member States of the European Union. The authors try to characterize Europeanization, but all theoretical definitions do not come close to the practical European Union and they all differ from each other. In theory, Europeanization means first of all, integration makes a state stronger and therefore, it puts the state in the center of Europeanization and secondly, the addition of a state builds politics in several different levels (11). In reality, the focus is the European Union in which every member is only a part of it. As a result, the national state itself neither symbolizes the basis for the European Union nor is there a connection between politics on national level and European level (11). This finally is what the European Union symbolizes: several member states are working together as a unit in order to achieve a goal which satisfies all members inside the union. However, decision making is difficult with twenty seven different opinions and therefore, laws and policies are compromises between the countries. Talking about the inside of the European Union one can say that decision making is connected with discussions. Even these discussions represent a talkative