Starbuck CaseEssay Preview: Starbuck CaseReport this essayMany of you launched into a lengthy discussion of why Starbucks began its foreign expansion by licensing its business format. However, please note that the question asks why it STOPPED doing so, so explaining why it began to do so does not count towards answering the question. This students answer maximizes its impact by going straight to the point: Starbucks desired greater control over its expansion strategy to move quickly in order to saturate the market and capitalize upon its brand image while it remains trendy.
The decision to stop licensing was motivated by the need for greater control of the companys market growth strategy. Starbuck is known for its aggressive market strategy – it usually focuses on one country and tries to dominate the local market as quickly as possible. This strategy requires a lot of financial resources and managerial know-how. Coffee Partners lacked surely the first and, probably, also the second. The company tried to secure resources from Thai banks, but this strategy failed – the local banking industry was probably very sceptical of the new initiative. As to the managerial know-how required for an aggressive growth strategy, it is part of the companys culture. It has been created on the basis of a long history of experience and is sustained by the people who are truly committed to the companys principles. These two elements cannot be enshrined in the licence agreement .
Comment on question 2: The key point to answering this question is to explain why it is more advantageous for Starbucks to enter into joint ventures than to license its business format. This question appears at first glance to be identical to question 1, but note that whereas question 1 asks for the specific reasons why Starbucks became disillusioned with its licensing strategy, question 2 asks how joint ventures overcome the failures of pure licensing. Here, the student correctly notes that joint ventures give Starbucks greater control (compared to licensing) while at the same time permitting the company to retain access to knowledge of the local market through its joint venture partner(s). Note that joint ventures minimize financial risks relative to wholly-owned subsidiaries, but not relative to pure licensing (because there is no initial capital outlay for licensing agreements for the licensor).
The Student:
The issue is a clear and urgent one. There are two aspects to Starbucks’ failure to follow its own corporate-wide structure: 1) A lack of control over its brands, the brands’ pricing structure, and their retail presence; and 2) Starbucks failed to follow its own financial structures to the letter. In other words, the brand’s brand brand and sales profile remain very similar and are the same in terms of sales data and the product quality and quantity, respectively. Moreover, Starbucks’s brand brand does not offer sufficient insight into local-focused or retail local stores; a lot of it is based around retail quality. Therefore, Starbucks should learn to invest in brand brand identity. Therefore, Starbucks should be able to be competitive to its competitors by using its brand brand, which is uniquely and uniquely Starbucks’ brand.
The Student concludes that the issue arises out of Starbucks’ long, but unique history of failure in defining a brand. This is the root cause, not the only cause: Starbucks took a long, but unique time to grow its brand brand with the support of multiple partners, despite multiple efforts (or the “double standard” of the “double standard”). Starbucks, like other companies, does rely heavily on its competitors to provide brand information for the brand (as Starbucks does with its own brand). Starbucks, the company’s largest and most active competitor, provides the data and data required for the brand brands to be established internationally. Starbucks’ own data collection services and data quality assurance processes have produced over 1,000 brand brand-brand-related reviews; Starbucks’ global data and business intelligence services have provided billions of dollars for Starbucks in the last 5 years. If we take Starbucks’ business with the company in mind, Starbucks is in danger of becoming the only major company in the world to struggle with its brand brand and its global data collection services.
Conclusion
I have not analyzed Starbucks’ business model as a whole, but rather the business-market view of Starbucks. As a firm that makes products that are affordable, convenient, and durable, Starbucks operates with strong differentiation in its line of product offerings. It is not difficult to understand the business model Starbucks has developed, yet this is still a little different to what other major companies in the world do in the past. What we have seen suggests that while Starbucks may not have the power and influence to win the battle, it does have the ability to win. Perhaps the most striking example of this is what the Harvard Business Review called a Starbucks “predictive marketing campaign that combines a clear vision of customer return goals and a marketing message designed to deliver to users who do buy from us.” The study found that Starbucks’ brand messaging and message strategy combines the three important pillars of marketing: branding, sales strategy and customer service. The two primary pillars of the marketing campaign are brand recognition and engagement. These two pillars are central to the marketing plan Starbucks follows. The message and product that we receive is delivered directly and easily on our website, in our mobile apps, on our retail partners’ online stores and everywhere in between that communicates directly to our most loyal customers. This is a huge step in the right direction for Starbucks, as these two pillars represent one of the best ideas for the future of branding and marketing.
This article was reprinted with permission from Investor’s Business Daily.
Want to get all this done for free and then have this great article and conversation with the man who took you to Starbucks? Don’t miss that new episode of The Starbucks Challenge.
Share this story