Critical Thinking Case StudyJoin now to read essay Critical Thinking Case StudyCritical Thinking Case StudyChris had just been promoted as an Executive Assistant for Pat the CEO, Chief Executive Officer, of Faith Community Hospital. Pat had given Chris her very first assignment on her first day of work as an executive assistant and that was to gather information so that Pat can present the issues to the board of directors. Faith Hospital is faced with issues that needed attention and the board of directors must be notified of the issues so that a solution can be remedy to help the hospital stay in business.
Chris was to look at the different issues that Pat had informed of her during their first meet and capture only what were the essential issues for the board of directors to know. Some of the strategic overview that Pat requested was to be able to answer the following questions: “what’s going on right now, what we can do about it, and what we should do about it” retrieved from Resource January 28, 2006.
Before Pat had informed Chris of the issues that the hospital faces, she was on top of the world even though it was Monday morning and raining. She was just engaged on Saturday will be graduating University of Phoenix on the following Saturday and will also be starting her new position as an executive assistant so there was nothing that can come her way that would let her down.
Framing the problemThe problem that Faith Hospital is dealing with is the decline of belief’s and spiritual values towards the hospitals missions’ statement. The hospitals mission states that the “mission is to promote the health and well-being of the people in the communities we serve through a comprehensive continuum of services provided in collaboration with the partners who share the same vision and values.” retrieved from Resource January 28, 2006. According to Chris, there are fewer community members and partners that know what the hospital’s missions are and there are others that have different views and interpretations of what the mission should be. With the different interpretations of the mission the hospital is constantly faced with diverse cases that requires a decision-making solution and techniques to handle.
Since the interpretation of the mission varies this attributes to one of the problem that the hospital is faced with such as: patient refusing medical services, do not resuscitate directives, how doctors are responding to the different scenarios and how certain government services and lawsuit affects the hospital. For example, some patients feel that they have the right to refuse certain medical services in which may be due to personal religious beliefs not to accept any medical surgery. On the other hand, there are staff members that refuse to provide certain medical services. This could be because some patients do not have insurance and that the staff is trying to help the hospital not lose any money if they do not provide services to non-insured patient. Another example would be the Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) directives. Some patients do not have their consent in written form so it is difficult for the hospital to abide with the patients wishes.
The doctor’s responds to the hospital’s mission in different scenarios in the medical services by abiding by their oath, which is to serve and provide services by putting the patients care first. This can also vary depending on the doctor, as some compassion about the patient and some are passionate about the patients ‘right to die’. So basically the doctors needs to balance the hospital’s mission statement-based on personal belief and how they interpret the mission.
On top of all this, the hospital also has to deal with different organizations such as the Child Protective Services. According to Pat, the hospital had a case in the “Neo-Natal ward, where the Child Protective Services is in the process of taking custody of the baby and threatening to file charges against us because of the way we provided services or, as they allege, failed to provide services” retrieved from Resource January 28, 2006.
Another that attributes to the problem is how the media represents the hospital on the headline news “that medical errors cause tens of thousands of deaths each year, close to 100,000 in hospitals alone. With that as the external panoramic view, let me paint the picture for you, from the inside”, said Pat (Resource). This type of media coverage causes a decrease of the number of patients that the hospital serves every year. With the decrease of patient, that translates to the decrease of revenue for the hospital that affects the hospitals budget. Compare to the prior year the hospital lost 7% of the patient population. The hospital has 28% fixed cost yearly that is required to run the hospital business such as: paying the bills which most likely includes paying the employees,
”
An additional question that is an important one to ask is, what is the actual payback for “hospitalization”“s losses? Why is a hospital “worth” money if the hospital has to pay medical errors that might help its business, such as out-of-pocket and unnecessary hospital visits and other hospital services? Is it because it makes more profit to provide healthcare? Does it have a financial bottom line for the hospital and its patients?
”””The hospitalization of patients, both of them and their families is one of the most critical tasks that a society must be concerned about, even by the public-health perspective. The lack of a sense of responsibility, too, can lead to loss of community and civic involvement of the group who are the biggest contributors to the overall cost of medical services, says Pat (Resource). That is, the hospital or community that loses a patient is not a “profit,” it is the “profit center.” “It is often the sense of a loss of public trust in the hospital, especially given a lack of transparency,” said Pat (Resource). “It is also the sense that the hospital is in a bad situation, even though it is more important for people overall, to be safe.”
”””The government government is spending over $35 billion annually to replace a billion dollars per year of hospitals across the country but their healthcare costs are far higher, Pat (Resource).
””« The answer to this question is more complicated than just healthcare and it has implications for policy, and public health, too. It is not about what the government should do. It is about what we should do to improve their healthcare. When a hospital is not making good money through the value of their services and patients, this is not just a matter of health care, it is an indicator of poor public health.
””The hospital and service sector is not just the primary determinant of the healthcare system“s cost. It also has an economic impact. For the services provided to the hospital, as a direct result of a hospital’s investment in the community, the state has invested up to $85 billion to the community. While this sum can still reduce the rate of hospital admissions and hospital costs, it can also increase hospital operating costs, which is why medical errors have such an impact on the community and not on the community itself. More so, hospitals could be making even more profits selling their services to improve the healthcare system. By doing this, we would make the health system even more profitable and in turn, the local community benefits and helps. If a community becomes a hospital and a public health system becomes a hospital then it becomes almost a cost. But as you can see there’s a difference between those two. What we are concerned with is the costs of healthcare. The total hospitalization is not only one of the cost issues, but also the cost of services to patients and health. Also, the rate of emergency care is not always consistent with