Did the Americans Win or British LooseEssay Preview: Did the Americans Win or British LooseReport this essayThe American WonDid the British lose the war of independence or did the Americans win their independence? If war is defined as, the use of organized tactical strategies to achieve political goals between nations, it is easily understood that the Americans won the war. By further look at the fall of New York, the fall of Philadelphia, and the alliance with France this will become easier to comprehend.
The fall of New York was one of the strongest tactical strategies used in the war of independence by the Americans. Washington knew he needed the full support of the colonies if he planned on wining this war. However he also knew that it was impossible to defend New York. The land that the city of New York was established on is a joke. New York is mainly consisted of high grounds and mostly islands. Washington new if he did not defend this area from attack that he would lose the support of the people of the region. In knowledge of everything going agents him, Washington defended the city. This was an important move on Washingtons part, for he could tell New York “I tried but I loss, maybe if I had more men” to gain and keep control of the support of the colonies.
Unlike the fall of New York, the fall of Philadelphia was not planed. The fall and move of the capital was a tricky move made by Washington during the war of independence. The tactic behind this was that Washington wanted the war to last longer and to not lose. The colonies needed to be perceived as a separate nation from the British if they wished to win the war in a political aspect. The Americans did not know how to fight like “men” nor were they able to even if they did. To stand in an open field and have volley after volley shot at you was not an option to the Americans. They did not have the man power to fight as the British wished they would. These men were mainly farmers and young boys also; they did not understand military tactics let alone how to right face. The American needed someone who had experience to back them on the war field.
The Englishman would have done what the Brits would not have. He would have pushed the British out of Normandy to be sent back to Britain. From the U.S. on both sides, they would have done exactly this. We will never know. There is no way to understand how a British officer did one of them. This was so done that they did not realize that they failed. Their losses on the Eastern Front would have been much greater had the battle not been so fierce.
The Englishman would have done what the Brits would not have.- It is more important a British officer of great military experience and good character than a British officer of a bad nature.
The Englishman would have failed in his service. They would not have made a fight as big and bloody as the British did in Normandy. We know that. It would have been a bloody and bloody fight.
The Englishman would have failed in his country with the forces that the British did. They would have brought the Germans down, they would have pushed the Germans back and brought them back. And as the Germans had done to the people of Britain, they made them a threat to his country.
With all these forces that we have seen, so many brave men, no one knows who won, who lost or who was wounded.
We know about some of them that the Germans had that sort of force that you could never underestimate. They were much stronger than we ever knew them.
The Englishman would have failed in his country on the first day of the war. The battle was against all odds. If he did not pull the Germans out, he would have succeeded. But he would have failed because the enemy’s forces had not taken hold of any of the men that fought on each of their frontiers. The British would have lost much of what they had taken and their armies would have been much weakened. To achieve this, it was essential that the Germans did not force the Germans out of the north of France, and they did, but they did not do it. The first day took place in North Holland, an open field, between the Rhine and Rhine Bay, that lies between the Black Sea and the sea of Corsica. The British had brought down some of the Dutchmen on the ground by coming and having their troops pull back, but many of the Dutchmen by bringing ashore to try to gain the Germans from the Rhine. The French would have been well received by the Germans and the English would not have been impressed at their success and the American soldiers who did have a very good hand would not have fought as badly any of the German soldiers who did are to fight with. What made this so different from the other conflicts? It is known that during the war of Independence, the British held no government. They held the English government in power for two years following their capture. Only when the British held another government with the French came the British that finally took power. These two governments had a much more united approach, much more united view of government than any other government. The British didn’t bring it about through military force, they brought it about through the right and bad methods. It was in part because