An Essay on Modernism Vs. Traditionalism in the Mayor of Casterbridge
Essay Preview: An Essay on Modernism Vs. Traditionalism in the Mayor of Casterbridge
Report this essay
An Essay on Modernism vs. Traditionalism in The Mayor of Casterbridge
During the first half of the 19th century English society was making the difficult transition from a pre-industrial Britain to modern Victorian times. In agriculture, most of the transition took place around 1846 with the repeal of the corn laws. This allowed foreign grain to be imported into England for the first time. Consequently, the entire structure and methods of agriculture in Britain were greatly altered. Much of the action in Thomas Hardys novel The Mayor of Casterbridge takes place during the years surrounding 1846. These were the years in which traditionalists took their last stand before being defeated in the name of progress. The contrasts between Henchard, a man relying on the traditional way of life and Farfrae, a man intrigued by modern ideas, illustrate the inevitability that progress and modernization will overcome tradition.
The conflict of tradition versus modernization is shown through Henchard and Farfraes contrasting approaches to business, their contrasting attitudes toward modernization and their changing roles in Casterbridge society. The contrast between Henchard and Farfraes business attitudes demonstrates the conflict between the traditional and modern approaches to business.
Michael Henchard and Donald Farfrae take very different approaches to bookkeeping and managing the employees of Henchards Business. Henchard is a man who has an old-fashioned attitude toward business; he is unable to write properly and as a result his financial records are poorly kept and unorganized. The majority of his business records are kept in his head. Farfrae, however, is a young man who approaches business with a modern attitude. Farfrae keeps the business account books in perfect order: not hesitating to work late doing it. A light shone from the office window, and there being no blind to screen the interior Henchard could see Donald Farfrae still seated where he had left him, initiating himself into the managerial work of the house by overhauling the books. Henchard entered, merely observing, Dont let me interrupt you, if ye will stay so late. He stood behind Farfraes chair, watching his dexterity in clearing up the numerical fogs which had been allowed to grow so thick in Henchards books as almost to baffle even the Scotchmans perspicacity. The corn-factors mien was half admiring, and yet it was not without a dash of pity for the taste of anyone who could care to give his mind to such finicky details. Henchard himself was mentally and physically unfit for grabbing subtleties from solid paper; he had in a modern sense received the education of Achilles, and found penmanship a tantalizing art. (p.72, The Mayor of Casterbridge)
The conflicts between modern and traditional approaches to business are demonstrated through the contrasting business ethics of Henchard and Farfrae. Henchard, being an older man, is not as skilled at penmanship or mathematics and as a result his bookkeeping skills represent an older and more traditional method of maintaining business accounts. Farfrae, being from a younger generation approaches business in a more modern way. He keeps the financial records as accurate and as up to date as possible, making sure to go through old records and correct any mistakes that Henchard had made previously. Henchards methods of business represent skills that are no longer in continual use. Farfrae is an example of how the advance of technology causes the loss of traditional, and valuable skills.
In the same way, the conflict between traditional and modern approaches to business is demonstrated through Henchard and Farfraes contrasting perspectives on how to manage employees. Henchard, the traditionalist, takes a stern approach when reprimanding employees, instilling respect into his employees through fear. Henchard punishes an employee for his tardiness. I dont want to hear it! roared Henchard. Tomorrow the wagons must start at four, and if you are not there, stand clear. I will mortify thy flesh for thee! But let me clear up my points, your worshipful- Henchard turned away. He asked me, and he questioned me, and then a wouldnt hear my points! said Abel, to the yard in general. Now, I shall twitch like a moment-hand all night long to-night for fear o him! (p. 94-95). A traditional form of respect for their employers found Henchards employees fearing him as illustrated though Abel Whittles reaction to Henchards reprimand. Farfrae however, took a more modern approach by instilling respect in Whittle out of justice. Abel was in the wrong to sleep in. However, Henchard was in the wrong to force the man to go to work without his breeches. I dont care what Mr. Henchard said, nor anybody else! Tis simple foolishness to do this. Go and dress yourself instantly, Whittle [said Farfrae] Farfrae resolved the issue efficiently and with justice which is illustrative of his modern attitude toward an employee reprimand. The contrasting views on business ethics held by Henchard and Farfrae are illustrative of the contrasts between tradition and modernization.
Similarly, the contrasting attitudes that Henchard and Farfrae take toward modernization and new developments help to illustrate the conflict of tradition versus modernism in Casterbridge society. As a result of technological progress, a new machine had been developed and introduced to the town of Casterbridge. It was the new-fashioned agricultural implement called a horse drill, till then unknown in its modern shape in this part of the country, where the venerable seed-lip was still used for sowing as in the days of the Heptarchy. Its arrival created about as much sensation in the corn market as a flying machine would create at Charing Cross (p.163). Henchard as the old-fashioned traditionalist ridicules the new machine, claiming that tis impossible to act! (P. 164) while attempting to explain the contraption, …and still more forcibly to ridicule it (p.164) Henchards views are distinctly different from those expressed by Farfrae who accurately predicted that the machine would greatly change agriculture during the Victorian era. Stupid? O no! said Farfrae gravely. It will revolutionize sowing hereabout! No more sowers flinging their seed without broadcasting, so that some falls by the wayside and some among thorns, and all that. Each grain will go straight to its intended place and nowhere else whatever! (P.165) This conflict of opinion toward the advance of technology is representative of the conflict between tradition and the progression on modernism. The horse drill is a more scientific method of sowing seed; there is less waste