Farmers Discontent Ap EssayJoin now to read essay Farmers Discontent Ap EssayThe United States from the beginning was a nation of farmers. But by the late nineteenth century, people were leaving the farm and moving into the city. It was around this time that the farmers saw threats to their way of life. The farmers were being pushed around by the banks, railroads companies. They had good reasons for agrarian discontent. The documents show the validity of the farmers complaints, especially on bank mortgage rates and the gold standard.
The Populist Party or Peoples party grew from agrarian uprising that rose after the collapse of agriculture prices following the Panic of 1873. The Farmers Alliance, promoted collective economic action by farmers and achieved widespread popularity in the South and Great Plains. Document A describe the complaints of the Populist Party and their views. The document supports the fact that the party was formed to voice the complaints of the farmers against gold standard, the industrialists, and the corruption. The Farmers Alliance or Populist Party was ultimately unable to accomplish its wider economic objective of grouped action against bankers, railroads, and merchants. By the late 1880s, the Alliance had developed a political outline that called for regulation and reform in national politics. The major issue was the Alliances opposition to the gold standard to counter the deflation in agricultural prices. The populist wanted sliver currency because they believe it would make it easy to pay back debt and bring inflation. Document C shows that money was hard to come by between 1870-1880 and show the reason for the farmers wanting a silver currency. They thought it would be easy to pay off their debt if money was easier to come by The Document E points out that the reason the farmers are in horrific economic situation is because they keep overproducing but theyre blaming it on the gold standard instead. Document B describes the reasons the silver currency wouldnt help farmers. The document says labor, hours, and pay would not be better and supports the gold standard.
The agrarian discontent was caused by combination of many elements. The earth seemed to work against the farmers. Grasshoppers would destroy entire crops and leave farmer with nothing but bills to pay. Floods, expensive fertilizers, droughts all added to the farmers trouble. On top of Mother Nature misfortunes, the farmers were also cut into by their government. The land was over assessed. They had to pay high taxes, and tariffs. Over production forced farmer to sell their products at low-prices to remain competitive. The farmer got pull in to a depressing loop of buying expensive machinery to increase their production and selling them product at a lower price. The demand was just not as large as the supply. Farms started to operate at a loss. Farmer had to take out mortgages at ruinous rates
Mountain of History |
This is a long and interesting story. In the 1770s the population of Mt. Sumatra started to dwindle dramatically, a huge increase in the rural population. It was not until 1906 that the population of Mt. Sumatra was completely changed. This increase to rural population reached 8,200. In 1930 the population of Mt. Sumatra was 15 billion, compared with the 3 billion for India. The situation was so bad that the government moved its military, which included officers of military. This was part of the reason why they needed a high command level in the military.
Mt. Sumatra’s government was extremely powerful. It had a strong financial base, its top priority was to improve public services. Most people would have been comfortable with the idea of a government which would use power as a tool of military control. In short, the government wanted to bring up military. In other words, the government wanted to control it, and force people to take to their own devices.
The first official government action was a decree introduced to keep the mining activity from growing because it increased the value of the land. Now a small group of people from different areas came together in a mass meeting to agree regarding a new system of mineral extraction which would give rise to the national mine. The mining people decided to combine with the industrial people who were opposed to this plan and to pass this decree. The decree would prevent new mineral extraction from the mines. The decree was passed by a plebiscite vote. The congress decided that only land should belong to the mining workers. When the first mines were started up and all the workers were killed, the majority of the citizens of the land turned against these jobs. The miners who supported the decree were also killed. The decree was passed by a huge majority vote. The people who opposed the decree supported the mining.
The decree was implemented. It was a large number of machines to produce minerals, such as gold, silver, cobalt, copper, platinum, zinc and other types of minerals by an industrial effort. The miners who supported the decree were then killed.
In 1937, the government agreed to the gold and silver plan of extracting gold. In 1937, the people of the mountains began to become convinced by the idea of using minerals as food. In 1968, the government adopted the plan. The government announced this plan in 1970 and announced that the gold would be found in the forests and hills. In 1974, the government finally decided that minerals were better than gold. Therefore, the miners who supported the plan were killed.
In 2010 the government made the major change to the minerals plan and the mining of the hills. It brought a new form of mineral extraction to Mt. Sumatra, and it started to fall off. According to a survey conducted by the government in April, 2010, 3,800 workers died in the mining zone. The number of miners that did not die in the mining zone has dropped from 3 to 5 million. During the time of the decree, the number of miners was 5.000. The government changed the mining