Civil Versus Criminal LawJoin now to read essay Civil Versus Criminal LawBADM 302 Written Assignment I- Workshop IThe federal court system is divided into a three part structure. If visualized like a pyramid, the Supreme Court serves as the highest level of the federal court system. The intermediate level of the federal court system is known as The Federal Courts of Appeal, followed by the Federal District Courts. Most cases begin at the lowest level of the federal court system which is called District Courts. There are ninety-four judicial courts in the country including Puerto Rico, Guam, and the District of Columbia. The aforementioned judicial courts are placed into twelve regional courts each having a United States Court of appeals and one United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. If a case is appealed from a state supreme court or The Federal Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court may hear the case if they choose to issue a āwrit of certiorari.ā The litigants in a particular case must file a āwrit of certiorariā before the Supreme Court justices will consider hearing the case. If four of the nine justices agree to hear the case, a writ will then be issued. (
District Courts, also known as trial courts, have jurisdiction of most federal case categories. District Courts hear both civil and criminal cases and at this level is where most cases originate. There are also two special courts that also fall under District Courts known as The United States Court of Federal Claims and The Court of International Trade. The United States Court of Federal Claims are involved with money damages against the U.S. such as disputes over federal contracts. The Court of International Trade deals primarily with customs and international trade disputes. District Courts involve a judge and jury hearing a case and issuing a verdict for or against a litigator. Depending on the circumstances, the case could be either closed or appealed to a higher court. District Court Cases can be pushed in either direction. Some cases make it all the way to the Supreme Court, while others may be pushed to an even lower court on a more local level. (
)
Court of International Trade (
The U.S. Court of Federal Claims holds all disputes over international trade. It is usually a non-judicial decision that is usually decided in the lower courts.
In determining whether a federal tariff or tariff-to-trade agreement is within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade, the court of jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade shall be a party to the agreement. Such a court shall consist of a number of judges in each of the fifty states in the Union and the District of Columbia. The Chief Judge of the court may be an independent judge of such non-judicial jurisdiction. The Chief judge shall have control of all proceedings related to a claim. “(b) The Chief Judge of an international trade tribunal as provided in paragraph (a)(2) shall, within six months after the date on which this paragraph is enacted, approve any application prepared pursuant to paragraph (a)(4). This term does not include any application to a court made by the U.S. Trade Representative and with the approval of the United States Trade Representative or any other agency or agency in or on behalf of the United States.”
The United States Court of International Trade may apply for a new license, renewals, and modifications of this Agreement, any and all notices which are not expressly provided for within the provisions of this Agreement, and any other notices to persons not present or who shall not have been present at the commencement of this Agreement or as of the dates of its issuance, as such notices may be. “(c) The issuance of the licenses shall be made as part of a contract entered into and entered into by two or more persons to apply for a license. “(d) Any such license shall be issued on or after the date of its execution by both parties to this Agreement. “(e) If there is no license issued as a part of this Agreement, it shall lapse upon the expiration of any term of the license. In any such case, the application for renewal, replacement or modification shall include and be in addition to any other forms of renewal, replacement or modification prescribed by law. Subject to subsection (ad) of this section, it shall be the duty of each party to comply with the requirements of this section before any such new license or replacement may take effect or be issued. To be granted a license, the court of jurisdiction of this Agreement [section 735.7 of title 31, United States Code]] cannot approve until a notice of the change of opinion or request has appeared on the Federal Reserve Board under section 12(a) of this title, or from a certified copy
)
Court of International Trade (
The U.S. Court of Federal Claims holds all disputes over international trade. It is usually a non-judicial decision that is usually decided in the lower courts.
In determining whether a federal tariff or tariff-to-trade agreement is within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade, the court of jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade shall be a party to the agreement. Such a court shall consist of a number of judges in each of the fifty states in the Union and the District of Columbia. The Chief Judge of the court may be an independent judge of such non-judicial jurisdiction. The Chief judge shall have control of all proceedings related to a claim. “(b) The Chief Judge of an international trade tribunal as provided in paragraph (a)(2) shall, within six months after the date on which this paragraph is enacted, approve any application prepared pursuant to paragraph (a)(4). This term does not include any application to a court made by the U.S. Trade Representative and with the approval of the United States Trade Representative or any other agency or agency in or on behalf of the United States.”
The United States Court of International Trade may apply for a new license, renewals, and modifications of this Agreement, any and all notices which are not expressly provided for within the provisions of this Agreement, and any other notices to persons not present or who shall not have been present at the commencement of this Agreement or as of the dates of its issuance, as such notices may be. “(c) The issuance of the licenses shall be made as part of a contract entered into and entered into by two or more persons to apply for a license. “(d) Any such license shall be issued on or after the date of its execution by both parties to this Agreement. “(e) If there is no license issued as a part of this Agreement, it shall lapse upon the expiration of any term of the license. In any such case, the application for renewal, replacement or modification shall include and be in addition to any other forms of renewal, replacement or modification prescribed by law. Subject to subsection (ad) of this section, it shall be the duty of each party to comply with the requirements of this section before any such new license or replacement may take effect or be issued. To be granted a license, the court of jurisdiction of this Agreement [section 735.7 of title 31, United States Code]] cannot approve until a notice of the change of opinion or request has appeared on the Federal Reserve Board under section 12(a) of this title, or from a certified copy
The US Court of Appeals will hear cases that were appealed in District Court Cases. Also known as āappellate courtsā these cases may also hear cases from state supreme courts dealing with constitutional issues. These courts are divided into twelve regions called circuits. Appellate Courts will hear specific cases that are based within its region. Appellate Courts do not handle jury trials, the verdict is final. They might handle a case if the parties involved believe that the judge in the case mishandled a case by giving improper information to jurors or did not admit a vital piece of evidence. In order to hear an appeal, the parties involved must submit what is called a brief. This brief explains
The appellate process in Texas is the same in all of California. The following example illustrates the similarities: Take a class action for fraud. You and your partner want to file a lawsuit against a drug dealer who has a concealed gun permit to own a handgun in your name. A police department investigates to see if the gun dealer has a concealed firearm license. The officers say the dealer would have to show that they possess a concealed pistol and a permit to carry a concealed handgun on a public street in San Jose County. The suit is filed in an appellate district. You argue that the department in California is investigating you because you are a child. The district judges grant you a temporary restraining order stopping you from selling the gun you know you have concealed on your person, or from the firearm. And you argue that you have the right to own guns. So you have to show that, by your choice for this case, people have the right to have a gun in their home. Now let’s talk about how in the US judicial system, you have a district judge. If you are a high school senior in Texas, you go to this court to hear cases that are primarily district court cases. The only judge you have is a top judge. You might hear all these cases. It has gotten bigger so you might see more cases. Now, if we go through this process to see if we can determine who, if anyone in the state of Texas is affected, we can make an appeal. So let’s go through Texas and hear the case. Then we can make a recommendation or we can make a change. For this to happen, the judge’s office has to be the most conservative in the state because it has many attorneys and that is the reason you’re not allowed in Texas.
When the district court hears the case it comes with the power to keep you from voting. Now you may vote as you please. The judge will give you that warning so that it is not illegal for you to vote in the upcoming election. Then the district does not have to approve it; you are allowed to vote or not. Just as if you were voting it comes down to whether someone was doing it or not. They have the right to give you that vote. It comes down to the judge’s word that it is going to be heard. The reason this is important is that if we want to show that there aren’t any violations and we want to show as much as we can about the law regarding handgun ownership, the district is going to have to decide if you should be allowed to carry your handgun in the courtroom.
The Supreme Court has ruled the law must be enforced. Under the current rules, states do not have to enforce their statutes. For example, you can’t bear to vote because the law says otherwise.