Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is an English film which was classed as a horror when it was released. Now more of a comedy when you watch it, the special effects are nothing compared to the new effects of today. The film is about an English gentleman who wants to releases his inner desires and do all the things he longs to do, so he makes a potion and changes into another character (the evil side of himself – Hyde)
The plot is hard to understand and its not very exciting either. It doesnt have the same effect on the audience now that it did 76 years ago, we laugh when its meant to be scary because our expectations of films are much higher due to better SFX, plots and acting
We no longer see women as weaker as or less able than men because we all treat each other the same. Women would have stayed at home doing the house work in the 19th century and should not have been seen a “sex” symbols as the character Hyde sees them. A modern audience would view this quite mixed. As a) many see that society should be fair and that women should work and b) although many women today are not seen as “sex” symbols people in the 19 century would see a bare table leg offensive let alone a womans
The plot of the mentioned content is perceived as difficult to comprehend and lacks excitement. This may be due to the fact that the expectations of today’s audience have evolved significantly over the past 76 years. With advancements in special effects, more intricate plots, and improved acting, viewers now anticipate a higher level of engagement and immersion.
Furthermore, the portrayal of women in the content reflects a stark contrast between societal norms of the 19th century and the present day. In the past, women were often confined to domestic roles and were not considered equal to men in terms of ability and strength. The character Hyde’s objectification of women as mere "sex" symbols aligns with the prevailing attitudes of that era.
However, modern audiences hold a more diverse range of perspectives on gender equality. Many people today advocate for a fair and equal society where women have the opportunity to pursue careers and are not solely defined by their sexuality. Consequently, the content may elicit mixed reactions from a contemporary audience.
It is important to note that societal norms and values have evolved significantly over time. What may be considered offensive or controversial in the 19th century, such as a bare table leg, is no longer seen as such in the present day. Similarly, the objectification of women as "sex" symbols is now widely criticized, as society has progressed towards more inclusive and respectful attitudes.
In conclusion, the content highlights the disparity between the expectations and perceptions of a modern audience compared to those of the past. It also underscores the changing societal views on gender roles and the treatment of women. By acknowledging these shifts, we can gain a deeper understanding of the content’s relevance and its impact on different audiences throughout history.