Wes Anderson
Essay Preview: Wes Anderson
Report this essay
Films that deal with childhood typically marginalize youth as an age of purity and disregard its harsh aspects. Though one might relate melancholy, detachment, and failure to maturity, filmmaker Wes Anderson appropriately associates them with children. However, he does so in an amiable manner that neither loses charm nor allows the adults to forget the child inside. By shrewdly using adult characters that behave like children, Anderson casts childhoods magical sense of wonder onto the viewer. Through this unique approach, the audience can genuinely perceive the phenomenon of childhood. Immature adult characters are only one of the many ways that Anderson captivates the viewers inner-child. Essentially, Andersons films lead audiences down enchanting paths and towards childhood with their subtle humor, oddball characters, delicate filming techniques, and fantastical sets/costumes.
Andersons elaborate sets immediately jump out of the screen and evoke a sense of Neverland. With both Rushmore and The Royal Tenenbaums located in a timeless Houston (Andersons childhood hometown) and New York respectively, Anderson dismisses any relevance of his films to modern day society. Instead of imparting any social or political critiques, these semi-fictional settings serve to narrate a magical story. In The Royal Tenenbaums, Anderson places the character Pagoda (played by Kumar Pallana) in front of the Statue of Liberty so that he blocks its view from the camera (Anderson, Commentary from The Royal Tenenbaums). Such a notorious landmark as the Statue of Liberty would chafe the films fantastical texture. Anderson longs for an enchanted New York not tainted by commercialism just as an adult yearns for the innocence lost after childhood. Remaining consistent with his other two films, The Life Aquatic transpires over imaginary islands and on invented seas. The film, in essence, occurs in an exotic world of make believe. Anderson even manufactured the fish in the film with the intention that they appear unrealistic–as if they were the figments of a childs imagination (Anderson, Commentary from The Life Aquatic).
The animated colors of these sets further emphasize the fantasy within the films. In Rushmore, green predominates the screen with plentiful shots of grass, trees and a fungi-filled pool. The prevalence of the color green accentuates the organic nature of childhood, especially in the character of Max who naively attempts to skip his adolescence and inhabit the adult world. The green also provides an entrancing landscape for the film, which offers a suitable venue for the fictitious events.
In a different way but with an analogous purpose, The Royal Tenenbaums contrasts such urban colors as stone and tarnished steel with a dormant red of the Tenenbaum household. With its peculiar colors, various turrets, and gothic windows, the house resembles a medieval castle that might subsist in a childs mind. Scott describes the films set as “a fantasy New York of grand hotels and brick and limestone mansions where gypsy cabs meander through the streets and the light plays off dark mahogany, red velvet and brown corduroy” (3). Instead of depicting the enchanted forests of Rushmore, the setting of The Royal Tenenbaums portrays the intrinsic grandeur that rests in a majestic city.
The primary colors of The Life Aquatic add a dynamic to the screen that pleases the primal inclination of the kid inside the viewer. The blue of both Zissous uniforms and the vast sea underscore the yellow of the submarine, helicopter and safe. The red of the crews nightcaps and of the plush carpet “further saturates the set with simple yet effervescent colors” (Anderson, Commentary from The Life Aquatic). And, as mentioned earlier, these colors facilitate Andersons objective of sketching a world outside of the ones we live in.
To go along with the dreamlike sets, Anderson also designs unconventional yet picturesque costumes for his characters. Luke Wilsons character of Richie Tenenbaum sports a camel-haired suit with a horizontally-striped Fila tennis shirt–the same outfit he wears during his years as a professional tennis player as well as during his adolescence. Richies reluctance to change his outfit relates to the fact that he “tumbles unwillingly into maturity” (Scott, 4). Anderson also conceals Richies features with long hair, thick beard and sizeable sunglasses. Since Richie is neither able to deal with his failures at tennis nor convey his furtive love to his step-sister Margot, he chooses to veil his face and stay in the past. Within this costume motif, Anderson daftly illustrates the childhood instinct to run and hide from ones troubles.
Max, in Rushmore, exhibits a similar juvenile tendency for denial with his persistent wearing of his Rushmore uniform. Even when he is expelled from Rushmore and has to attend the public school, Grover Cleveland, Max sports his uniform with a pseudo pride. He refuses to concede his dream of attending Rushmore even when it is an impossibility. Maxs incongruous Rushmore uniform–along with his thick glasses–illustrates his childish attempt to inhabit the adult world of maturity. Max becomes even more foolish as he grows to be “enchanted by the idea of his own precocity” (Scott, 1). Maslin recognizes Andersons visual statement of inanity for the character of Max “whos as much of a sight gag for the wide-angle lens as he is a flesh-and-blood character” (2). Though Maxs grand endeavor might seem to contradict Richies reluctance to grow-up, both characters naively aspire for the unattainable.
Andersons original characters do not necessarily require off the wall costumes to accentuate their immature attributes. Their overly dramatic performances color the films with a shade of irony. Part of the humor in Andersons films comes from the fact that the out of place, exaggerated acting lets the audience know that these people are acting. In The Royal Tenenbaums, Eli Cashs (played by Owen Wilson) zany aphorisms seem so absurd that one can see his acting for what it is–acting. In an early scene, Eli tells the reporters around him with a sly grin: “Everyone knows that Custard died at Little Big Horn, what this novel presupposes is: Maybe he didnt?” One might dismiss this quote as nonsensical, but its absurdity coming from the mouth of an acclaimed author such as Eli turns out to be quite humorous. Later in the movie, Eli justifies his childish/eccentric behavior when he tells Richie, “Ive always wanted to be a Tenenbaum” (The Royal Tenenbaums). This all returns to the recurring concept of idealistic aspirations, only in this case, the goal is familial love.