Study CaseEssay Preview: Study CaseReport this essayIf a noncompeting agreement is signed, then NONE! If, however, you did not have to sign anything restricting your knowledge, you should be able to share what you have learned. There are, of course, trade secrets that should remain so unethical information would be any information about the first company. Discussing anything about the first company is unethical. Salary information shouldnt be shared. I dont think personal information about anyone at the first company should be provided. Rooted in a companys culture are many idiosyncrasies that might not work for another organization. So, if in fact information does get passed, it might be of no value to the new company. Most high-turnover jobs dont possess enough knowledge to really do any damage if the information does get out. Companies should play fairly in the competition game and not spy on one another, and not causing harm to others. The information that is given out could hurt the other company and you need to understand what is considered acceptable and unacceptable information ethically. For example if I were to be hired from Chase Bank to soma bank, I would not be discussing products that would have to do with my Chase. If I were to be hired on as a teller than I could use the practices that I learned from chase and share them with my new company. This information would not harm Chase and are not considered trade secrets.
You can learn the type of character the company has For example, the company and its workers discipline, methods, productivity, and many more. There are some differences between goods and services, which definitely affect how you think about managing both the customer interaction and the marketing generally. Example, services tend to be perishable in the sense that they cannot be inventoried. Consider the impact of this element on airline seat pricing; its a huge driver in that industry! Service is difficult to control. For example, one lawyer is not interchangeable with another lawyer, even though they may work for the same firm. This is very different from the world of products.
Time Warner and America on Line did not apply business ethics, moral rules, and regulations that guide judgment in their decision on a merge. Ethical issues occur on all levels of a company, from a mail clerk to a CEO and in many different forms from stealing a paper to the total disregard of shareholders. Ethics applies to everyone within a company. Corporate social responsibility is the implementation by a company of a planned focal point for satisfying the legal, ethical, economic and philanthropic responsibilities expected of the company by its stakeholders beyond the pursuit of profits. TW and AOL did not exhibit corporate social responsibility. Steve Case was more focused on satisfying his personal goal of AOL becoming a blockbuster global communications company rather than its employees and stockholders. Time Warner should
The merger of American Airlines and U.S. TV Networks is a case that illustrates the complexity of governance in our society. We have many, many questions as to how to balance our power and influence over the U.S. media, with how and where to put the power back where it belongs to be put back into the hands of the people. It is the responsibility of any nation to provide critical guidance and guidance for the people of that nation. As these companies, we must create clear, unambiguous and accountable rules that support and encourage competition, innovation and innovation in those around us, not only within the U.S. but across their industries.
With the merger of American Air and U.S. TV Networks, both are the best known, successful, and growing providers of national news and information to the masses. Under our new Federal Communications Commission, this new organization becomes the first ever accountable public service provider to be a part of the US national broadcast broadcasting system. A federal agency, the FCC is, with the help of Congress, able to make it a legal requirement that any company that offers services are under the Title II Fairness Doctrine (the Fairness Doctrine) when they are placed in a position to carry news services of their choice.
Together we see an unprecedented opportunity to deliver a competitive, accessible news and entertainment service that is both safe and accessible from all, as well as an important part of the conversation on all things news. We are proud that we are able today to introduce a new, bipartisan proposal to the federal FCC which would remove the last of the barriers to a competitive, open national news and entertainment service.
We would like to congratulate and encourage General Motors C.C. for its bold and innovative partnership with our great nation’s news media. Together with all media organizations, we are committed to creating a community of innovative local news outlets that will create new, sustainable news for the community by connecting to the people, inspiring our nation and bringing new members together to share stories.
And as we embrace and encourage new, innovative local news outlets, we recognize the enormous challenges that lies ahead as local news outlets evolve. But it is up to our members to set the appropriate regulations and to make sure these new places of diversity and information provide the best news. We understand the strong and diverse nature of news in our society. And we will continue serving the public better than ever before.
When an industry is ready, and its CEO has the time to be fully motivated, to truly understand and contribute, we are encouraged by its strength. Indeed, that includes the strength of its executives, who always have their work ahead of them to make sure they’re making the right decisions based on their experience and experience.
The merger between US TV Networks & American Air is something that must be debated on an agenda for which we have the great support of Congress. Achieving this bipartisan agenda will serve as the foundation on which we build an America where the press can move forward and build a world of opportunity for all Americans by delivering high quality national news.
As America’s largest publicly traded company, and one of America’s biggest broadcasters globally, we should be fighting this battle to our death. We will be as well on this vital and difficult battle as any national television company, as our nation’s largest broadcast broadcaster. So we are honored to join with TW and AOL in advocating a change