Internet Credibility
Essay Preview: Internet Credibility
Report this essay
Internet Credibility
For a person who does not do research on the internet, credibility may not mean a whole lot. Due to ease of access to the internet, a lot of people use this source to retrieve information. But, when the internet is used for this purpose, it is important to follow certain guidelines. The first thing that comes to most peoples minds when they read something from the internet is, “Is this true?” One must learn to make up ones mind by asking exploratory questions about the source being used. For the information to have credibility not only does it entail believing the information but also making sure that one verifies it in many different ways.
The guidelines that I use for credibility verification are, that the information should come from an authentic source, the author or source should show evidence of knowledge, be of good quality, not be biased, be up-to-date, have summaries or abstracts, contain citations, be consistent, treat opposing views fairly, and the reader should always have an attitude of skepticism.
The first step to take when verifying credibility of a Web site is to use the URL to determine the source of the information. By doing this, one can decide whether the information is coming from an academic or a commercial source. This basically lets one know the authenticity of the source. One way to ascertain this is by looking at the URL extension, if it is .gov, or .edu, then we can at least have some assurance of the particular Web page having credibility. Academic systems enforce meticulous standards of research, reviews, and analytical cross-examinations by other literati in the field. The greater the number of people who have read and agreed with the information, the more reliable the information seems to be. Also if we have an authors name, we should look to see if he or she is affiliated to a reliable organization.
The second method would be for the author or source of the information to show some evidence of being knowledgeable, reliable, and truthful (Harris, 1997). Usually if there is any type of obscurity in the information, then this would tend to make it less credible. One way of verifying this would be to find out if the authors qualifications are available. One can also verify any association that the author might have with an educational institution or any other reputable organization. And, one can even, sometimes, find links on the page that will explain who the author is and what is their mission or philosophy.
The third method would be to look for the type of presentation or quality of the written paper. Does this information have spelling mistakes or incorrect grammar? Today, with such advanced technology, anyone can publish anything on the Web and there are no Web standards to ensure accuracy of the information. So, it is up to one to decide if, according to the number of spelling or grammatical errors, the website is credible. We should take into consideration that when information is coming from a reliable source, such as an educational organization, it usually has proper grammar and spelling. And finally, it is important for the page to be well designed.
The fourth method is to be alert to a biased paper. Most of the information on the internet usually has its own intended audience. One should not only be aware of this intended audience, but also of the biases found. Many users may not know that some search engines “sell” priority in their listing so that the criterion is based on commercial concerns and not necessarily on the quality, reliability, or usefulness of the sites listed. (Burbules, 2001). Information should be impartial and unprejudiced. There should be no conflicts of interest and it should be reasonable. In some cases, one needs to find sources which are biased in different directions to be able to make any type of judgment on it. Information pretending to objectivity but possessing a hidden agenda of persuasion or a hidden bias is among the most common kind of information in our culture. (Harris, 1997)
The fifth method would be to make sure that the information is up-to-date. One has to look on the Web page to find when it was last updated because in many instances publication or revision dates are not always provided, therefore, one has no idea if the information is five years old or five minutes old. The date on the Web site may indicate either when the information was written, when it was first placed on the Web or when it was last updated. So, even though we might have a date on our information, we may still not be sure if it is really up-do-date. One can also check the links provided on the page. How current are these links? Or, one can even ask if the currency of information really matters for the particular research being done.
The sixth method is to look for content summaries, abstracts, or tables of content. This is basically looking for a shortened form of the information. This information about information is called meta-information. This gives one a chance to look briefly at information without having to read it completely. This way, a quick judgment or analysis of the content can be made as to whether or not to proceed using this internet resource. Meta-information may also include ratings, reviews, commentaries and even recommendations. It is important also to look at the negative meta-information that contains reviews about the information being judgmental or judicious. One needs to be careful with this type of negative meta-information and scrutinize the information thoroughly.
The seventh method is to look for citations. Looking for citations is especially very important when researching mathematical or scientific information. There should always be some type of information given, either by verification, documentation, supported statements, references or listed sources which should provide evidence to prove that what the author has written or the claim made is credible. If it is a source you can triangulate, or find at least two other sources that support it (Harris, 1997), then this would make it more credible information. Anytime sources do