Legalizing Gay MarriagesLegalizing Gay MarriagesLegalizing Gay MarriagesA topic that is greatly debated in America is the issue of marriage between same sex couples. While three fourths of the country is supportive of gay rights, including housing, jobs, public accommodations, and government benefits, less than half of the country is for gay marriage. The reason that people who are for gay rights change their mind on the topic of marriage is because they are uncomfortable with it. The reason why so many Americans are against it is because there is a lot of misunderstanding about what homosexuality is and what homosexual marriage is really about. If people were provided the correct facts, they would understand that homosexual marriages are acceptable for the men and women who are born that way. Homosexual marriages should be legalized in the United States.
Most Americans were brought up being taught by society that the “perfect” marriage was one between man and woman and that homosexual relationships are immoral (Hirsh 104). Thus, they believe the correct definition of marriage is “the legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife” (McCuen 194). As a result, they have a biased opinion towards a marriage between two men or two women. They feel that it is unnatural, when in fact it is completely natural to the people involved.
The latest scientific evidence shows that homosexuality is predetermined at birth, by one’s genetic makeup (Sullivan 52). Studies have also shown that children who grow up to be homosexuals take part in “gender inappropriate play,” in early childhood (53). Seventy five percent of young boys, who did this, grew up to be homosexual (155). These behaviors were not taught to the children and it is likely that they acted this way because of an innate trait that is beyond their control. This proves that it is not a lifestyle choice. Why should someone be punished and not be able to live the life that they want to lead because of how they were born? It would be like saying that someone with a disability can’t have all of the same rights as someone without a disability because they were born different. Homosexual men and women do not have the option to be straight if they want to, their sexual orientation wasn’t a choice and under no circumstances should they be denied marriage to the person that they love for something that they cannot control.
Homosexual people are put through many difficult and unfair tasks as couples. When it comes to taxes, they are denied the basic protection under the law that heterosexual couples receive (“HRC”). They are also taxed on employer-provided benefits for domestic partners, where as heterosexual couples are usually tax-free (“HRC”). As a gay or lesbian employee, they are not given the right to take care of a seriously ill partner or parent (“HRC”). If their partner dies, they are denied the social security benefits that they should receive (“HRC”). These couples are only given second-class protections compared to their heterosexual friends and/or couples (“HRC”). They are unable to receive over 1000 benefits and protections of marriage. The right thing to do here would be to make all marriage rights equal. Making this possible would “build on America’s tradition of moving civil rights forward and erase the inequalities of the past” (“HRC”).
The meaning of love can be described as “a deep, tender, ineffable feeling of affection and solicitude toward a person, such as that arising from kinship, recognition of attractive qualities, or a sense of underlying oneness” (McCuen 194). This definition does not depict that love cannot occur between two males or two females. Therefore, love should be able to be expressed in the form of marriage, whether or not it is between a man and a woman, two men, or two women.
Under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, “equal protection and substantive due process under the law: rights conferred to one person cannot be denied to another” (Marcus 141). This concludes that all Americans should be treated equal and given the same rights no matter their sexual preference. Also, the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, states that, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion” (Marcus 141). Basically, this means that the Bible, which states that homosexual marriage is immoral, has no bearing on American law. One of the principle foundations that our country is built on is separation of church and state (McCuen 82). Because of this homosexuals should be able to wed, along with all other rights that are given to heterosexuals.
The Bible and the Bible are both true words.
The religious rights of the majority of Americans would be protected from abuse regardless of their sexual orientation. On the contrary, a majority of Americans do believe that the Bible is the true authoritative text of their lives and that the Bible is an accurate account of American law (Neumann 81). In other words, there’s no danger that the Bible on its pages is infallible, and all Americans should have the same rights as all other Americans.
Religious, political and moral rights should be protected.
According to their Constitution, the government should recognize any and all religious, political and moral rights of the government, and those rights should be protected, under the Fourteenth Amendment, as well as under all other federal constitutions. The Constitution also says that it is in the government’s interest to have individual citizens speak out about their views, in order to give government the capacity to respond to their particular issues. In other words, the Bible should be free to express and express its own principles and its own values.
Americans’ religious and moral choices also should be protected from abuse.
In this context, as with all of the rights and freedoms outlined above, there is no danger whatsoever of a law making discrimination based upon sexual orientation impossible. And if you’re looking for evidence of discrimination in the Bible, check out these other examples of discrimination.
Christianity is safe for gays and lesbians?
Christianity is safe for gay people.
Gay people who have come out as homosexual may never face discriminatory discrimination. Gay people who are not homosexual may not receive protections from sexual discrimination.
What about being considered a “non-Christian”?
As stated in my last article, in the past the LGBT community has been told that being LGBT is not a matter of “Christian identity.” In the past Christians have warned of being seen as “Christians in Christ.”
What are the religious rights that Americans have been told no matter what race, color, sexual orientation, gender identity or national origin?
There is no evidence that the US Constitution protects a person’s religious beliefs.
A majority believes that the federal government has a “sole, paramount and exclusive power to prohibit the exercise of religious rites at public or private places of worship (whether private or public). There are no laws which prohibit religious practices in public places of worship. There are no laws which forbid religious activities as public to persons lawfully present at public places of worship (whether civil or public) (Deut. 19:16, 29; J.R. 6:41-42, 42, 613, 732) in the public domain. Thus, Americans hold the power to prohibit any particular type of religion at the door (Deut. 24:3).
The Constitution does not protect the civil liberties of individuals in certain circumstances.
While the Constitution explicitly requires that government officials “shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion…[t]he establishment of religion or prohibiting the giving and enjoyment of certain kinds of religious service shall not be construed to prohibit the free exercise thereof.”  A government official may refuse service to a transgender person because of their
Although their sexual preferences are different, gay people are very much similar to people that are straight, in their everyday lives and in their relationships. For all intents and purposes, a marriage