Leadership Vs Management Defined
Essay Preview: Leadership Vs Management Defined
Report this essay
Leadership and Management
Volumes and volumes have been written on the principles of management and leadership. But one needs to look no further than a basic dictionary to understand the most important principle — the differences between the two. Websters Tenth New Collegiate Dictionary defines to manage as “to direct or carry on business or affairs” or “to exercise executive, administrative, and supervisory direction of.” The definition of management expands this some: “the conducting or supervising of something” and “executive skill.” Although often substituted for each other, management is quite different than leadership. Websters defines leading as “to guide on a way especially by going in advance” and “to direct on a course or in a direction.” To lead also means to set an example or to set a precedent. A leader is further defined as “a person who has commanding authority or influence.” One can manage either people or things, but one leads only people. Yet, managing people is very different from leading people.
A manager conducts, directs, and supervises. A leader commands, authorizes, and influences. These are subtle differences but important ones. Management demands attention to detail, diligence, time management, and organizational skill. Leadership benefits from these same attributes but places a higher premium on courage, fortitude, natural ability, and inspiration. Good leaders may not be good managers and good managers are not always good leaders. A leaders authority precedes his decisions; a managers credibility is built from his decisions. A manager executes a given program; a leader devises the program. History provides the best examples.
General Dwight D. Eisenhower is considered a great manager. Ike conducted the greatest logistics operation ever. He assessed a strategic problem, collected inputs from those above and below and those of our allies, created a staff and command, equipped and trained an army, and delegated authority to a series of combatant commanders. Ikes greatest traits were his ability to organize, understand logistics, and tend to every minute complex detail. However, other generals were selected over Ike for personal command of initial battles. Ike became the natural choice for Supreme Commander only after the war progressed