Race, Poverty & GlobalizationJoin now to read essay Race, Poverty & GlobalizationRace, Poverty & GlobalizationINTRODUCTIONHow is poverty related to globalism, and why are people of color under the most severe threat from this process? Certainly, other people are also under a threat from this globalization process, and some would assert that democracy and capitalism itself may be undone by this process if it is not checked. To answer the above question and to understand why minorities and other marginal populations are most at risk, it is first necessary to better understand what globalism is, particularly the type of globalism that dominates todays markets.
In the most general sense, globalism refers to “the process in which goods and services, including capital, move more freely within and among nations” (Greider 1997:32). As globalism advances, national boundaries become more and more porous, and to some extent, less and less relevant. Since many of our early industries, such as steel, were location-sensitive, there was a natural limitation to globalization. To be sure, some things remain location-sensitive, but mobility is the trend (Norwood 1999). It is assumed that liberalizing laws and structures, so that goods and services can become more globally focused, will produce more wealth, and indeed this seems to be true. Using this general understanding of globalism and globalization, it would be accurate to say this process has been developing and growing for well over a hundred years (Fishlow 1999:5).
In conclusion, it seems clear that there are two things that are most important in a nation to have access to land: land holdings and access to natural resources (Graf and Turchin 1999:43). The former is the land ownership of an individual. In the other case, it is the economic activities, especially with regard to human capital, that make up the national economy (Graf and Turchin 1999:35-37). While some of the land rights in the same country are shared between people, it cannot have the same level of control over one another that could lead to a full national socialist economy. The reason a nation has a national economy in the first place is that it has a right to land in, say, the United States and so it can compete with other countries to maintain it. To this end, there are two elements that are central to many countries. One is the need to maintain the physical and psychological level of control that a country has over its own natural resources. Land ownership is an important factor to understand in a nation’s political future, but it is ultimately linked to how an economy operates. This level of control over its own physical and emotional resources is most important in a land government, where economic activity, including land ownership, dominates, and the national economy grows faster than any single industry in the country. The second is that the central government of the country requires the participation of people from among the many nations involved. This involves using economic policies and institutions that the central government has imposed, which help to achieve better socio-economic conditions and improve human capital over time (Greider 1997:43).
If the United States can be a true socialist country, it has the potential to produce more wealth and greater social mobility, even as it has already increased industrialization and access to land (Greider 1997:43). The United States has only a few more years until it decides to become a full socialist country. If the United States is successful in this challenge, it may well be able to extend the reign of power to some as early as 2008 (Greider 1997:43). When the United States becomes a full socialist country, it will become more and more of a part of developing countries, as globalism and the social power dynamics between nations become more entrenched. But for all practical purposes, the United States is not a socialist country. The United States now represents one of the four largest socialist countries in the world, and it will continue to be that socialist country for many years to come.
| Worlds of Socialist History
From 1901 to 1928 The Socialist Revolution, 1931–2040 World War II, 1940–1950 World War II, 1950–1960 World War II, 1960–1980 World War II, 1980. This is where world-building and cooperation take place with increasing intensity and complexity, and this world building starts and ends between countries through the formation of new national economies, and with social movements. This is as important as world- METHODSData CollectionAfter searching Florida State University’s (FSUs) Online Archives, I came across a reference manual that I believed would help me to compile and analyze my sociological research. I used the work of Otto Newman and Richard de Zoysa (2001), The Promise of the Third Way: Globalization and Social Justice, as a conceptual framework for data collection. Adhering to the advice of Newman and Zoysa, the following types of data were collected in order to “maximize time and to see the same scene from different angles” (2001: 115): Documents and LiteratureAfter further searching FSUs Online Archives, I selected several books, four journal articles and an in-depth study in order to begin my literature research. I read pertinent chapters and excerpts from the books and reviewed the journals and the study. Below is a list of the literature I used: BooksGreider, William. 1997. One World, Ready or Not: The Manic Logic of Global Capitalism. New York: Simon & Schuster.Newman, Otto and de Zoysa, Richard. The Promise of the Third Way: Globalization and Social Justice. 2001. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Singh, Kavaljit. 1999. The Globalization of Finance: A Citizens Guide. London & New York: Zed Books.JournalsFishlow, Albert. “Review: Globalism: New Reality, Old Strategy.” July 1999. American Journal of Sociology 2: 2.Kasarda, John D. Oct. 1998. “The Threat of Globalism.” Race and Class. 40: 2-3.New York: Touchstone.Norwood, Janet L. July/August 1999.”Global Finance in the Americas: Wealth & HungerRevisited.” NACLA Report on the Americas. 33:1.Yutzis, Mario J. “A Special Issue on Globalization and Discrimination.” 1998. Peoples for Human Rights, IMADR Yearbook. 6.StudyUnited Nations Development Programme. “Human Development Report.” 1999. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Interviews General Sense And Florida State University. (September 27, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/general-sense-and-florida-state-university-essay/ |