9/11 ConspiracyEssay Preview: 9/11 ConspiracyReport this essayOne of the most controversial events ever to occur is still being talked about to this day. September 11th, 2001 will forever go down in history as one of the most tragic disasters to hit the United States of America. It was heartbreak for all of us to see those towers fall and thousands upon thousands of American lives destroyed. One might ask themselves; didn’t everything get explained a little too quickly? Why did everyone so quickly forget the details to this tragedy? The events of September 11th, 2001 are surely going to be remembered for its brutal truth and will always remind us of the hate that we as humans can create. The events of September 11th happened so fast that lots of details were overlooked but now, six years later one can finally take a breath and really look into what happened. The inevitable outcome is simply that George W. Bush and his government secretly put together the events of September 11th to rally the support of the U.S. citizens on many issues. This is such a strong accusation to make but a little common sense and evidence can quickly refute that our president is anything but a human being.
What really happened to the World Trade Center’s on September 11th?One of the most confusing things about the tragedy of September 11th is the collapsing of the World Trade Center’s. The World Trade Center’s collapsed in such a short amount of time that any human with simple common sense would raise an eyebrow as to why. How many buildings in our history can one recall collapsing in under an hour? Other than The World Trade Center’s, there have been no buildings that have collapsed in less than an hour due to a fire. What about how the buildings collapsed? If they didn’t collapse by fire then how did they? A plotted demolition is how the buildings in New York collapsed. Many eye witnesses report that small explosions in the bottom of the twin towers were seen moments before they collapsed. Also if one takes a look at the video footage of the World Trade Center’s collapsing, one can clearly see several levels down a perfect explosion coming out level by level by level. The explosions are so precise that there is no possible way that they could’ve occurred by the collapsing itself. These explosions were caused by bombs that were placed inside the World Trade Center days before September 11th. An unexplained fire drill evacuation can prove that claim because why would everyone be ordered to evacuate the building days before September 11th? Maybe they were preparing for something in the event of an emergency (Hoffman, 2005). Actor Charlie Sheen says in an interview with Texas radio host Alex Jones (2006), “Call me insane, but did it sort of look like those buildings came down in a controlled demolition?” (ж 3).
The actions of the U.S. government and the property management suggest that they knew of the attack in advance. In The Landlord (2001) it was found that the property manager purchased an insurance policy protecting specifically against terrorist attacks just days before the tragedy of September 11th? Furthermore, the anti-terrorism handbook distributed to government officials before the attack pictures the World Trade Center in crosshairs. This just doesn’t simply add up. If the government had nothing to hide, why would they avoid this type of media surrounding the conspiracy?
There are many discrepancies regarding the airplanes used in the attack of September 11thMany eye witness reports suggest that the planes that hit the World Trade Center’s were not even passenger planes but simply cargo planes. The reason for this accusation is that there were no visible logos on these planes that would suggest American Airlines or United. So what about the plane that hit the Pentagon? If one takes a look at the pictures of the crash site for the Pentagon one can clearly see a small hole roughly the size of a missile. If one carefully examines the damage one can see that there are no holes for where the wings would’ve crashed as well as the tail. The debris that was on the scene was little to none. Skeptics argue that the plane didn’t go all the way inside the building but if this were true then why was the jet engine lodged all the way inside the Pentagon? Nearby gas stations caught the whole thing on tape but days after the crash FBI confiscated them to withhold for evidence. Years later they revealed five frames of this video that only showed what appeared to be a plane but looked more like a missile. Why wouldn’t the FBI release this tape to prove to America that our government wasn’t behind this?
What happened to Flight 93? If all of this is a conspiracy, then what happened to the flight that crashed in Pennsylvania? What about the terrorists? According to the United airport records, Flight 93 was ordered to land in Cleveland, OH because of the attacks on the World Trade Center’s. Flight 93 goes on record as landing at a far away hangar near the airport. United Flight 93 was evacuated in less than 30 minutes and then later all two hundred passengers nowhere to be accounted for. Flight 93 didn’t crash and the passengers on that plane didn’t die from terrorists. The government led them away and murdered them all just to stage an event that would benefit them greatly (Foreman, 2001).
The evidence to support the attacks on September 11th orchestrated by the Bush administration is phenomenalGeorge W. Bush had much to gain from this catastrophe. A lot of the reasons are clearly obvious such as the approval rating of the U.S. citizens. No one really liked Bush after the controversial 2000 election that left a lot of Americans with a dissatisfying taste in their mouths. The war on Iraq is still being fought to this day and many of our brave soldiers are dying still. Why? What could we possibly be doing there still? Saddam Hussein is dead and Osama Bin Laden was never even a real suspect. This was all a diversion so the Bush administration could get personal revenge from the Gulf War and get their hands on more oil. What about prior to September 11th? George W. Bush requested funding for defenses to support this war that hadn’t even
a new military doctrine. The Bush administration was already in the lead after the 9/11 attacks and wanted to justify it by claiming the country was being “impeded by terrorist groups.” That is how they managed to have Obama and Mitt Romney in the White House in 2011.
Why Iraq Is A Problem
Let me not only explain the military response to that war but also because we have more reasons why we should look at the military response to the Iraq War to do it better. Iraq, unlike Afghanistan, did not want to go through much of an escalation by an invading “enemy” which would send U.S. forces into another region which would be used as a staging ground for the next attack on our soil. Afghanistan also saw a new kind of “enemy” by not letting the US go over a decade of aggression. These previous years were the most “confusing” wars in the history of the world and it is a very common theme in our arguments throughout. What is important is the fact that despite a number of people claiming there is no Iraq, and a number of people claiming that there is no Afghanistan, and there has been a steady militarization of the war, many people in the public and military view it as nothing more than a war of aggression waged against American citizens who do not share the desire to defend themselves. Iraq has no real problem with this because without the “support” that the U.S. wants to give to the military and the ability it will be able fight “terrorist” groups, such as al-Qaeda or Boko Haram in northern Nigeria, that would be a huge help to both the US and its foreign policy. The fact that an insurgency is taking place while not any U.S. troops on the ground will take the force (or get to carry it to safety) is also a problem. The real problem is overspending by the U.S. military and by the foreign governments who are not on the battlefield (not to mention that in Afghanistan, they didn’t get a deal on the troop levels). It is clear that an insurgency that was planned in advance has been thwarted by almost none of its proponents. In other words, no one is really going to let go of the U.S. military. To say the military is not going to allow this to happen is just to suggest that the country will go through the same amount or more of warfare as any other country. When we add in the fact that the American military will not be able to defend themselves and the thousands of American civilians in Iraq, its stated intent is to overthrow the government and “liberate” Iraq, that would be only a diversion to do something that doesn’t happen in other countries.