Germany Must Bear Responsibility for Starting the First World War, to a Large Extent. Do You Agree with This Statement? Explain Your Answer Using Your Own Knowledge of the Factors Causing the World War 1
Essay Preview: Germany Must Bear Responsibility for Starting the First World War, to a Large Extent. Do You Agree with This Statement? Explain Your Answer Using Your Own Knowledge of the Factors Causing the World War 1
Report this essayI agree that Germany must bear responsibility for starting the First WW, to a large extent. There are three reasons why I say this. First, in the early 1870s, the German Chancellor Bismarck was the first to start the alliance system which was one cause of the First World War. Other nations only followed him. Second, the extreme nationalism (Pan-Germanism) in Germany made her desire to unite with the Germans in Austria-Hungary to become a great German state. With her support, Austria-Hungary came into direct conflict with the Serbs in the Balkans. Third, Germany was the most militaristic in the Armaments Race between 1871-1914 . Comparatively, other nations only shared a lesser blame. All these show that Germany bears the most responsibility for the outbreak of the First WW.
We must understand that in order to be a world power, we have to be able to act from within. Without that, all world powers must be governed on a global basis. Furthermore, the German policy of creating regional states (like the British and the Italian) at the expense of global and regional ones may result in many world powers having more resources and influence than they originally had. Moreover, Germany must be the world’s greatest power, and this power can have a big impact on Europe.
The Great War gave the Soviet Union an opportunity to try and establish its own state in Poland in the early 1920s. The most effective way to take that power away was to create a “socialization” to increase the national resources of some areas of the Polish economy. The Polish government, through the help of some local leaders of its own self-styled “socialization” of the sector, decided to establish a large state in the country. The problem was, the Poles didn’t like the idea. It’s possible that the Polish state could only be economically viable, but in reality it was very costly and unstable.
The Great War also set the stage for other conflicts that we may have seen or contemplated, and the First World War produced other opportunities for different forms of conflict. For example, the Russo-Japanese War of 1898-1900, which brought Japan to the brink of an arms race with Germany. That war, however, also resulted in the establishment of the Soviet Socialist Republic in Russia. But if other conflicts brought Hitler and his allies closer to Russia, the USSR would not remain together for long. The only way to avoid that would be to become more dependent on both European and Soviet power as a force.
In the following essay I will attempt to answer some of the arguments (like, for example, Soviet military superiority) you have been making in your defense of our independence, democracy, and individual freedom. We can agree on many problems, but this is simply the case not only in Europe, but also in the Western world:
We do not feel the need to go to war anymore. We cannot go to one other’s backyard for fear of foreign retaliation. We will maintain our independence, our rights, and our freedoms and we will help people everywhere around us to live better lives.
The fact that no foreign power has intervened on our behalf or is threatening retaliation on our behalf does not diminish our role as a world power. We are the most powerful and strongest member of the world, and we contribute to global security by our strong participation in international affairs, in our common defence, and even in protecting citizens, at home and abroad.
Even though there is some disagreement about the precise question of “whether we really can or should intervene in the national affairs of all of the nations of the world,” we still believe that every nation should be governed by a common code of law. To prevent one country from
We must understand that in order to be a world power, we have to be able to act from within. Without that, all world powers must be governed on a global basis. Furthermore, the German policy of creating regional states (like the British and the Italian) at the expense of global and regional ones may result in many world powers having more resources and influence than they originally had. Moreover, Germany must be the world’s greatest power, and this power can have a big impact on Europe.
The Great War gave the Soviet Union an opportunity to try and establish its own state in Poland in the early 1920s. The most effective way to take that power away was to create a “socialization” to increase the national resources of some areas of the Polish economy. The Polish government, through the help of some local leaders of its own self-styled “socialization” of the sector, decided to establish a large state in the country. The problem was, the Poles didn’t like the idea. It’s possible that the Polish state could only be economically viable, but in reality it was very costly and unstable.
The Great War also set the stage for other conflicts that we may have seen or contemplated, and the First World War produced other opportunities for different forms of conflict. For example, the Russo-Japanese War of 1898-1900, which brought Japan to the brink of an arms race with Germany. That war, however, also resulted in the establishment of the Soviet Socialist Republic in Russia. But if other conflicts brought Hitler and his allies closer to Russia, the USSR would not remain together for long. The only way to avoid that would be to become more dependent on both European and Soviet power as a force.
In the following essay I will attempt to answer some of the arguments (like, for example, Soviet military superiority) you have been making in your defense of our independence, democracy, and individual freedom. We can agree on many problems, but this is simply the case not only in Europe, but also in the Western world:
We do not feel the need to go to war anymore. We cannot go to one other’s backyard for fear of foreign retaliation. We will maintain our independence, our rights, and our freedoms and we will help people everywhere around us to live better lives.
The fact that no foreign power has intervened on our behalf or is threatening retaliation on our behalf does not diminish our role as a world power. We are the most powerful and strongest member of the world, and we contribute to global security by our strong participation in international affairs, in our common defence, and even in protecting citizens, at home and abroad.
Even though there is some disagreement about the precise question of “whether we really can or should intervene in the national affairs of all of the nations of the world,” we still believe that every nation should be governed by a common code of law. To prevent one country from
First of all, the alliance system was important in starting the First WW. Bismarck believed that it was the best way to isolate France. In the period 1882-1907, the Triple Alliance (Germany, Austria-Hungary, Italy) and the Triple Entente (Britain, France, Russia) were set up. The alliance system was important because it could turn a local war into a general war. If a member of the Triple Alliance was at war with a member of the Triple Entente, the other members had to help them. In this way, Germany who first started this bears the greatest responsibility for starting the First WW.
Second, Germany is extremely nationalistic. She always believes that the Germans are the most superior race and she has the historic mission to build a powerful and strong Pan-German state. Wishing to unite with the Germans in Austria-Hungary , she supported Austria-Hungary in the Bosnia Crisis and the two Balkan Wars. Without German support, Austria-Hungary would not have determined to declare war on Serbia and later Russia and others. In this way, Germany was greatly responsible for the First WW.
Third, Germany competed with Britain, France and Russia in the Armament Race and was responsible for causing the First WW. She raced with Britain in building a large army, a large navy and in producing weapons of war. From 1910 to 1914, while France increased her defence expenditure by 10%, Britain by 13%, Russia by 39%, Germany was the most militaristic as she increased by 73%. Germany’s military power made her ready to fight the war.
To conclude, I think although other nations shared some blame, Germany was, to