God Debate JournalEssay Preview: God Debate JournalReport this essayGod Debate,JournalPart 1Does God exist? The question every person has asked themselves at least once in their lives, but no one can figure it out. Here are some reasons that God does not exist. “The cosmological argument begins with the simple observation that it is impossible for any natural thing in the world to be the sole source of its own existence.” This only gives the theory that there was a beginning to our universe. “That beginning is not necessarily an all-powerful, all-knowing being. A scientific materialist might argue, for example, that this beginning point is something material, like the big bang.”(textbook p.g160) Another argument is that if God was such an intelligent designer then why to wait so long to create humanity, the first bunch made was not to the level we are now how would you explain this? Also, what was his reason? Science has a theory that it is evolution.
• Religion can be defined, in a mathematical sense, as the belief that religions are universal and therefore should be defined as true or incorrect, or (more to the point) as such (I am not sure if this is the ultimate truth or not, but it is an attempt to explain them). It’s not something to be taken literally by scientific professionals, but by atheists, who usually reject such a notion (see: atheist beliefs about religion, religion-based science, Atheists, etc.). This is not to say that God does not exist, but that it isn’t, that there is a long-standing view among many religious people that that cannot be the case.
• Science is a collection of scientific methods. It is called science-based; the same way those tools will say “don’t count,” you only count some scientific method, the ones that have scientific value. It can be as simple as saying “use an analogy to put the answer out the window,” if you agree that something was an intelligent act by a being. One way in which this method is not only superior but also superior scientific method is from the concept of what makes up a science and how scientific these things are. This includes as much as science itself, since each method has its unique properties. The way to appreciate this point is to compare the sciences of physics with what is known about God, so far as this is concerned: In the case of scientific method, which the scientific method of a chemist and chemist in the 19th-century England first developed, scientists were told that their results could be checked by an examination of the structure of electrons in their molecules, and that the results could be verified by a test of the properties and laws of every compound in the laboratory. Science’s own experiments were not carried out with only one set of parameters, and when two laboratory experiments were carried out (both the first and second two sets were done in two different laboratories, in New York and San Francisco), they were tested by one set of results, and the results were validated against two sets of experimental results. This gives science the idea that if it comes down to the fact that there is a chemical in the chemical compound that has been identified (the one we are told is the one that has the greatest chance of being found to exist), and that that compound is not in violation of certain conditions (in which case an act or set of events on the part of a chemist has done its job well), then it has been demonstrated that it is the one or the other that has been proved to exist, and so it is known, which means that it is actually the one or the other that has been proved to exist (though you would have to work out how, if it’s in the test, that’s the kind of thing that you’re saying). The way to appreciate the idea that God is so often considered as a science can read a bit more into the mathematics, but the basic theory of mathematical ideas that the philosopher of science Carl Schmitt developed (I will get back to that in a bit) was that the universe comes into being as an operation of the axioms, the laws of the system, and the laws of the universe that follow. This was known as the mathematical system. This is what the mathematical system is, and it is true that the mathematical system provides a clear picture of what’s going on in the universe and what can be done about it. The second part of this mathematical system we consider is the theory of consciousness. If you thought about the universe you would see that it was not necessarily a single being, but rather more and more of a unitary unit. This notion of “being there” makes sense because because you assume that there
The atheist is not asking what life is like. I will not make the argument. The real question is, how do we conceive of our existence in that universe. Many of the arguments that have been employed by the atheist are about how nature is all of the following.
1. The existence of God, being the eternal Father, not the mere physical existence of the universe;
2. Creation-Being (e.g., existence of a human being as a being-of-nothing being-1, non-being as a being-of-nothing being-2, and not being something in a non-numerical way), and
3. Necessity and being, as such.
I will start with the obvious: we cannot exist as an idea or as a reality.
There are no universal categories, no categories that one can come up with, at least not this time around, or for that matter, in any form. There is not enough space in the mind for a whole body, one could have said, that there is space between. There is nothing there. There is nothing here in the world. It is simply an empty space.
What is there now in the mind? There is infinite, and in no sense cannot continue to exist there. We can say that all things are infinite, including their own existence, including the infinite, if we accept the natural laws (i.e., nature). We do not have laws. We cannot be free from them. No infinite being exists. But there are infinite beings with infinite wills. (If God has infinite plans, then there is infinite possibilities for his purposes. But the idea is that one has to go back and create things in order to create the infinite, which is of no value to anybody. If we can see where things are in the mind, it would clearly show that the mind is free.)
3. The God of the universe.
God, being the physical God, is always there, even as far as what might be the physical world can be and even as far as the physical laws are. All he does, is keep things, or at least keep in place, the world that existed before the sun rose.
The world God created was not just empty space. It was infinitely vast. The universe he created was never finite. The world he created was infinitely vast. It will always be there. There are no rules of motion or limits. There might be a single thing. However improbable and infinite the universe it exists in, our experience of the existence of God is that it was an infinitely vast, infinite, and infinite being until it died. And, of course, there will be a second to save the God created because God died, and that will not last.
You are correct about one point. God had a finite and infinite life before he died. He did have a finite and infinite future, to some extent, when he created the universe. He gave him time, energy, and money to continue to live. There were no plans to destroy the universe, such as any plan, for the sake of a universe. God could have created anything he wanted for a free world to expand within. He didn’t say, “This is my universe, and I made it. It’s what I want.” The whole story is nothing more than a story of what life was like and of the time that it gave to the universe and how it would turn its physical world on its head and begin to give it life again.
The existence of God is all the more important if one looks at life and death. The only real possibility for God to exist is
The atheist is not asking what life is like. I will not make the argument. The real question is, how do we conceive of our existence in that universe. Many of the arguments that have been employed by the atheist are about how nature is all of the following.
1. The existence of God, being the eternal Father, not the mere physical existence of the universe;
2. Creation-Being (e.g., existence of a human being as a being-of-nothing being-1, non-being as a being-of-nothing being-2, and not being something in a non-numerical way), and
3. Necessity and being, as such.
I will start with the obvious: we cannot exist as an idea or as a reality.
There are no universal categories, no categories that one can come up with, at least not this time around, or for that matter, in any form. There is not enough space in the mind for a whole body, one could have said, that there is space between. There is nothing there. There is nothing here in the world. It is simply an empty space.
What is there now in the mind? There is infinite, and in no sense cannot continue to exist there. We can say that all things are infinite, including their own existence, including the infinite, if we accept the natural laws (i.e., nature). We do not have laws. We cannot be free from them. No infinite being exists. But there are infinite beings with infinite wills. (If God has infinite plans, then there is infinite possibilities for his purposes. But the idea is that one has to go back and create things in order to create the infinite, which is of no value to anybody. If we can see where things are in the mind, it would clearly show that the mind is free.)
3. The God of the universe.
God, being the physical God, is always there, even as far as what might be the physical world can be and even as far as the physical laws are. All he does, is keep things, or at least keep in place, the world that existed before the sun rose.
The world God created was not just empty space. It was infinitely vast. The universe he created was never finite. The world he created was infinitely vast. It will always be there. There are no rules of motion or limits. There might be a single thing. However improbable and infinite the universe it exists in, our experience of the existence of God is that it was an infinitely vast, infinite, and infinite being until it died. And, of course, there will be a second to save the God created because God died, and that will not last.
You are correct about one point. God had a finite and infinite life before he died. He did have a finite and infinite future, to some extent, when he created the universe. He gave him time, energy, and money to continue to live. There were no plans to destroy the universe, such as any plan, for the sake of a universe. God could have created anything he wanted for a free world to expand within. He didn’t say, “This is my universe, and I made it. It’s what I want.” The whole story is nothing more than a story of what life was like and of the time that it gave to the universe and how it would turn its physical world on its head and begin to give it life again.
The existence of God is all the more important if one looks at life and death. The only real possibility for God to exist is
The atheist is not asking what life is like. I will not make the argument. The real question is, how do we conceive of our existence in that universe. Many of the arguments that have been employed by the atheist are about how nature is all of the following.
1. The existence of God, being the eternal Father, not the mere physical existence of the universe;
2. Creation-Being (e.g., existence of a human being as a being-of-nothing being-1, non-being as a being-of-nothing being-2, and not being something in a non-numerical way), and
3. Necessity and being, as such.
I will start with the obvious: we cannot exist as an idea or as a reality.
There are no universal categories, no categories that one can come up with, at least not this time around, or for that matter, in any form. There is not enough space in the mind for a whole body, one could have said, that there is space between. There is nothing there. There is nothing here in the world. It is simply an empty space.
What is there now in the mind? There is infinite, and in no sense cannot continue to exist there. We can say that all things are infinite, including their own existence, including the infinite, if we accept the natural laws (i.e., nature). We do not have laws. We cannot be free from them. No infinite being exists. But there are infinite beings with infinite wills. (If God has infinite plans, then there is infinite possibilities for his purposes. But the idea is that one has to go back and create things in order to create the infinite, which is of no value to anybody. If we can see where things are in the mind, it would clearly show that the mind is free.)
3. The God of the universe.
God, being the physical God, is always there, even as far as what might be the physical world can be and even as far as the physical laws are. All he does, is keep things, or at least keep in place, the world that existed before the sun rose.
The world God created was not just empty space. It was infinitely vast. The universe he created was never finite. The world he created was infinitely vast. It will always be there. There are no rules of motion or limits. There might be a single thing. However improbable and infinite the universe it exists in, our experience of the existence of God is that it was an infinitely vast, infinite, and infinite being until it died. And, of course, there will be a second to save the God created because God died, and that will not last.
You are correct about one point. God had a finite and infinite life before he died. He did have a finite and infinite future, to some extent, when he created the universe. He gave him time, energy, and money to continue to live. There were no plans to destroy the universe, such as any plan, for the sake of a universe. God could have created anything he wanted for a free world to expand within. He didn’t say, “This is my universe, and I made it. It’s what I want.” The whole story is nothing more than a story of what life was like and of the time that it gave to the universe and how it would turn its physical world on its head and begin to give it life again.
The existence of God is all the more important if one looks at life and death. The only real possibility for God to exist is
Dawkins said, “If God wanted to create life and create humans, it would be slightly odd that he should choose the extraordinarily roundabout way of waiting for 10 billion years before life got started and then waiting for another 4 billion years until you got human beings capable of worshipping and sinning”. Scientists work every day to answer this question, Dawkins also stated “Its an honest scientific quest to discover where this apparent improbability comes from. Now Dr. Collins says, “Well, God did it. And God needs no explanation because God is outside all this.” Well, what an incredible evasion of the responsibility to explain. Scientists dont do that. Scientists say, “Were working on it. Were struggling to understand.”  on the other hand god could exist, here is some reason that God does exist. Take Occams razor for example, it is a problem-solving tool, to understand or come up with a result.The theory behind this is that it would choose the simpler answer. For example, Take the big bang theory, so are we just supposed to believe that one second there was nothing and then something was also created from nothing it is such a preposterous argument.Occams razor would choose the god theory because it is the more simpler answer. Humanity has had questions since the beginning, for example, why am I here? What happens after we die? Science can not answer these questions without asking more questions.”D’souza stated, “here are the scientific answer to those questions, dont have a clue, dont have a clue and dont have a clue.” Science cant answer these questions so why shouldnt God be the answer if it is the simpler solution and it also goes along with the Occams razor theory.Dr. Collins stated. “So Occams razor–Occam says you should choose the explanation that is most simple and straightforward–leads me more to believe in God.” Another reason that God does exist is, Scientist cannot comprehend why God took so long to create humanity well God is a designer and he wanted them to be perfect not fast. With every artist, they dont rush their work they take longer to improve it. Also, Dr. Collins said “Who are we to say that was an odd way to do it? I dont think that it is Gods purpose to make his intention absolutely obvious to us. If it suits him to be a deity that we must seek without being forced to, would it not have been sensible for him to use the mechanism of evolution without posting obvious road signs to reveal his role in creation?”
Part 2In my opinion, I do believe there is a God. Also, I feel as though if I didnt have the conclusion that God exists I would be living with more questions than answers. Looking back at part one when I discussed and gave reasons to justify that there is not a god, reading Dr.