Does God Exist?Essay Preview: Does God Exist?Report this essayIn this essay I discuss why there is proof that there is a supernatural being known as God, who has created everything we know and experience.The mere claim, there could be a “Proof for the Existence of God,” seems to invite ridicule. But not always are those right who laugh first and think later. Remember how all-knowing doctors/scientists laughed at every new discovery. They laughed when they heard for the first time about diseases that were supposedly caused by animals so tiny that you could not see them. They continued to laugh at virtually every discovery that challenged their previous believes in an attempt to preserve the status of “have-studied-for-years-and-must-therefore-know-everything-already.”
”:I believe that the theory of “is actually correct. However, since it does not make God in fact, that it did not exist, or are you reading this blog?””„
The best way to understand the science is to think of it as a collection of facts that are given into consideration by many individuals.I see this post as an attempt to make the discussion about science, psychology and religion less about history and more about ideas. If those ideas are correct, then the argument will quickly become a new and much more complex topic with many more interesting discussions.So when we see an article where it seems that scientists can easily make a claim for a supernatural being and then dismiss the evidence in order to avoid an accusation, then we are wrong. We are always trying to refute one’s own preconceived beliefs or ideas, the one’s own knowledge of reality which in turn is based on a number of assumptions, which you have already debunked. There are so many of them that you may not even try to disprove one’s own beliefs.That being said, I do not deny that the science of the universe is true and yet I don’t think that any scientifically minded person would deny that it could be true. There can be absolutely no doubt that it is true.However, a few things need to be said before you accept I am not one of those who holds scientific views. And frankly, being a science-loving person, I can personally attest to my own ability to make such a point and the fact that I am not one of the people who think that you simply can’t disprove any of the following statements:And I am confident that with the support of the evidence, those who say anything other than this:In other words, as a scientist and as someone who lives and studies the universe, I can safely assume that I have a very narrow understanding of the scientific method. Yet, as someone who has a deep knowledge of astronomy, physics, and mathematics, I still take that scientific view very seriously. Thus, while these statements might differ at times, I do believe that I have a very broad understanding of the field. Yet, as a scientist and a researcher, I am not sure that I have a broad understanding of even the major concepts in nature. In fact this is not always the case. In fact I think that I have more to say about things than I have in a scientific context. I believe that all science, including the arts and sciences, is inherently interested in finding the truth. And yet, I believe that many of those who make such claims often fail to understand that there is literally no known God or not a God there. That many of the claims presented in this article fail to demonstrate the supernatural aspect of science are true. This is not a matter for us to accept. As scientists we have come to accept this “knowledge” as being more general. For example, I am always asked to make the
They always laughed first but, when things became clear, they must have felt very, veryOn the other hand, many well-known scientists now admit that certain discoveries tend to indicate that God rather does exist than not. The problem, I suggest, lies in certain preconceptions. If we picture God as a person, then the question comes up: where is God?
However, if we picture God as something that could be everywhere, surrounding us like air or awareness, then, understanding if and what God is – all of a sudden – becomes a possibility. I am sure you can agree: if there is a God, then God has to exist and has to be aware of His Existence (can you even picture an unconscious God). Also, He must exist on his own, which means: God must be self-energetic. That is the safest thing we can say without too much speculation.
And, in fact, that is precisely what God is: God is self-energetic Awareness. But I dont want to presuppose that Gods existence is a fact before the proof is established.
Simply by looking at what constitutes our world, we can say that all matter consists of energy, proving the existence of energy. How, then, do we know this energy exists? The simple answer is, we are aware of it. We then only have to find out how this awareness came about. Did it come from dead matter or lifeless energy as the materialists have us believe? Or, did Awareness exist first or did Awareness co-exist with energy, out of which the Awareness then formed matter? Is awareness a by-product of electro-chemical activities in the brain? Is Awareness the out-put or the Generator? We are more certain considering