Problem-Solving AidEssay Preview: Problem-Solving AidReport this essaySTEP 1: Describe the SituationBefore identifying the issues and opportunities in the scenario, examine the Mind Map and read the text materials carefully identifying the concepts on the map. Write several introductory paragraphs identifying the key course concepts and theories that are illustrated in the scenario and note why they are important (do remember to cite your references to the text and/or selected readings). Then describe how the situation at the subject organization reflects these concepts and theories as related to the issues and opportunities the organization in the scenario is facing.
When identifying conflicts, start by comparing and contrasting the interests, rights and values of the different key stakeholders. One must consider ethical dilemmas. A good way to do this is to think about how the values of the different stakeholders compete with each other. Some values to consider might be social responsibility, integrity, accountability, fairness, respect, and honesty, among others.
STEP 2: Frame the “Right” ProblemThe problem must be broadly stated so that it will lead to many possibilities, and must be one where there can be no single answer.A litmus test for a problem statement:It should be short and easily understood (25 words or less).It should be about realizing opportunities.It shouldnt have a solution or suggest a specific tacticЖit should lend itself to many solutions.One way to begin to think about how to craft a problem statement is to think about what the organization aspires to be and the major challenge it must overcome to achieve that vision. Ask:
What does the organization aspire to be?What is the range of opportunities that will help to achieve the vision?STEP 3: Describe the “End-State” GoalsThe end-state goals are really how the organization will know it has achieved what it wants to achieve.What does the ideal future end state look like?What are the goals that define it?STEP 4: Identify the AlternativesDo my possible solutions support my problem statement? Have I thought about how I might be able to combine several into a blended solution?When creating alternatives:Identify the alternative using generic benchmarking.Make sure the findings are company specific.Validate the alternative with the generic benchmarking findings you used to create the alternative.Benchmarking Analysis: The A-B-C approachSummarize/paraphrase the benchmarking findings. Include the relevant citations expected in all scholarly research.Explain the relevance of this benchmarking to the company in the scenario.Identify a specific solution that you can detail for the company in the scenario, based on this finding.STEP 5: Evaluate the Alternatives:Seldom is there a single “best solution.” Second-tier alternatives integrate the best of various alternatives into a “second-order” or “second-tier” alternative.
When evaluating alternatives, ask:How does each alternative meet the end-state goals?What scoring system should I use? (See Table 3 in the Problem Solution Template)Are there goals which, if not met, would eliminate the solution?What are my assumptions and constraints?What are some best-case solutions?Eliminate all but the best two or three solutions.STEP 6: Identify and Assess RisksIn this step, the two or three possible solutions are each evaluated to identify potential risks and negative consequences. If the risks or negative consequences are severe enough, a solution might be eliminated from consideration. For the solutions that remain, the following question is then asked: How do we address or mitigate these risks? Techniques
Sets of Assessment:The challenge on these levels is to make the most of the available information to make the correct decision. This step identifies the best approach and analyzes the alternatives.
The above test assumes that the alternative is an efficient alternative to the original value and is a reasonable one to use. This step, however, assumes that the alternative is not an inherently expensive alternative and also that certain risk reduction schemes (such as the SSE, which does not provide for risk reduction) are more cost effective than those.
Step 7: Assess the Risk of Mitigating RiskIn this step, the risks are taken up by a series of important measures. The number of times all the steps have been used is determined by:What is the correct risk management strategy? What information has been provided to assess the threat that is at issue?What is the appropriate way of implementing this risk reduction strategy?The most important factor in deciding on each of these steps is:The information required to assess the following question must be provided to the relevant public agency:A potential risk of mitigation or mitigation of risk must:Be in addition to the original value and provide good information. It should be sufficient to include the following:The risk of mitigation must be:Proportional to anticipated and long-term improvements at risk. It must not be too large and have only a minimal impact at the end of the assessment.There is no evidence that a single solution solves the problem if all solutions will come from an even distribution.The risks to be assessed are the sum total of all the steps taken and their cumulative risks for mitigation and mitigation of potential risk and the following factors: The probability that the results for this step are similar to or above the value of the alternative’s alternative.The percentage points of reduction to have been identified.The percentage points of reduction to be identified not included.The number of steps to be employed to identify. The number of possibilities and alternatives.The number of steps to be performed.The probability of achieving the following step:The probability that the solution is feasible. What steps are there to be avoided? What steps are there to be avoided in any other direction?And, the percentage points to be considered by the public agency.
Step 9: Assess Risk of Mitigation and Mitigation of RiskThe risk assessment is done with the assumption that this level of risk management is appropriate but not too high. The actual values are taken from the approach report. The overall risk of success is assumed to be the sum total of the steps taken. What constitutes a safe level in the calculation of the estimated risk of risk of mitigation and mitigation of risk?How does the risk of mitigation and mitigation of risk be integrated?The estimated total risk of a level of risk reduction and remediation is calculated using:The results are based on a number of factors, including what other risk factors would be most helpful.The following factors are chosen