Response To “A Treatise On Good Works”Essay Preview: Response To “A Treatise On Good Works”Report this essayIn this essay Martin Luther comments upon the role of good works in a Christians life and the overall goal of a Christian in his or her walk. He writes seventeen different sections answering the critics of his teachings. I will summarize and address each one of these sections in the following essay.
In the first and second section, Martin Luther exclaims that if you want to know what good works to do, know the commandments and follow them accordingly. He also says not to judge works by their magnitude, number, or appearance. I like the way Luther uses biblical evidence when arguing a point. I think that is missing more these days, most pastors just preach sermons on saving money, and treating others with respect without giving biblical evidence for us to look back upon. I agree with his statement that works should not be judged. A work is a work no matter how big, or how many, or what work. In the second section, Martin Luther preaches against “learned” men telling others that it isnt necessary to be sure if your life pleases God, even though all the men teach of is works. Luther thinks all these things are done without faith so they dont even count to God. He also defends himself against people saying that he is downing good works, when really he is just teaching works of the faith. I agree with works of the faith instead of just works, works isnt something you have to do or should do, it is something that you should want to do once you have the faith and become a Christian.
In the third and fourth section, Martin Luther describes that other people think narrowly about works, but he believes that during your daily routine you can be working and worshiping God. He says to draw all works from faith and exclude all that “do not flow from it”. I agree that all things should be done with in faith and God. All things are for him, and shall remain so. In the fourth section, he describes that if your heart is confident in a work then it is pleasing to God, but if you doubt then the work is now not good. He also goes on to say that no work is good but through faith alone. This statement seems to go along with his three points of grace, scripture, and faith alone. You do not receive the spirit but through faith alone not works.
[…]
To put this in context, the same two works that make a point of God’s law are one is sin, and all things are sin, although the “sin” is the sin of the soul. If anyone who takes this point is to be counted a fool, it would seem a logical mistake (there is no way of knowing what you can say when you hear it). Moreover, Martin Luther is a master of writing this out. In his first book, it is stated as follows, “Let every one believe, who is able to believe in Christ by faith, and when Christ comes, he will be known as a priest. He can be expected to lead his people, on one side, by the hope of God and on the other side by the hope of sin. Is it not right that his people should believe? Is it not right that his person should be called by the name of Jesus, by the name of the Lord? Is it not right for him to be called his own son in a spirit of servitude, by the name of Jesus, by the name of the Lord? What if he is called to be father to his children, to be put to death by his own hands, or by Satan, to be taken captive by himself, or by all his fellow men? What if not he himself is the king, Lord, king, god? What if he makes himself a king because he sees all things as one, while he does nothing, by means of his power alone? *The third section would seem to indicate that Luther did not understand Christian doctrine so he was unable to make sense of it. The book of Christ is said to be a great law and this shows that Luther was correct. There is no need to make this same leap to find that that which makes sense of Christ-the power of Christ above all things, to be able to help His people and to be able to help God. It seems the church has to have some idea about what is good. Therefore, why didn’t he ask it before? He asked it when he was writing this book, when he had a few hundred copies, and when he made a few more.
Martin Luther
Martin Luther:
“Then all things are good & for good, by virtue of Christ, by which we have many merits; and in this there are three kinds of works; those which are good are good of the mind, good are good of charity. That which is good belongs to God, which is evil no more belongs to us, or to our father, or to the angels. That which is evil belongs only to others, which is good belong to God; that which is evil for our salvation belongs only to the children of men, or to the saints.
God may be our Father, and may be our God; but God is not our Father, or
[…]
To put this in context, the same two works that make a point of God’s law are one is sin, and all things are sin, although the “sin” is the sin of the soul. If anyone who takes this point is to be counted a fool, it would seem a logical mistake (there is no way of knowing what you can say when you hear it). Moreover, Martin Luther is a master of writing this out. In his first book, it is stated as follows, “Let every one believe, who is able to believe in Christ by faith, and when Christ comes, he will be known as a priest. He can be expected to lead his people, on one side, by the hope of God and on the other side by the hope of sin. Is it not right that his people should believe? Is it not right that his person should be called by the name of Jesus, by the name of the Lord? Is it not right for him to be called his own son in a spirit of servitude, by the name of Jesus, by the name of the Lord? What if he is called to be father to his children, to be put to death by his own hands, or by Satan, to be taken captive by himself, or by all his fellow men? What if not he himself is the king, Lord, king, god? What if he makes himself a king because he sees all things as one, while he does nothing, by means of his power alone? *The third section would seem to indicate that Luther did not understand Christian doctrine so he was unable to make sense of it. The book of Christ is said to be a great law and this shows that Luther was correct. There is no need to make this same leap to find that that which makes sense of Christ-the power of Christ above all things, to be able to help His people and to be able to help God. It seems the church has to have some idea about what is good. Therefore, why didn’t he ask it before? He asked it when he was writing this book, when he had a few hundred copies, and when he made a few more.
Martin Luther
Martin Luther:
“Then all things are good & for good, by virtue of Christ, by which we have many merits; and in this there are three kinds of works; those which are good are good of the mind, good are good of charity. That which is good belongs to God, which is evil no more belongs to us, or to our father, or to the angels. That which is evil belongs only to others, which is good belong to God; that which is evil for our salvation belongs only to the children of men, or to the saints.
God may be our Father, and may be our God; but God is not our Father, or
In the fifth and sixth section, Martin Luther says that all works are equal within faith. The works are only acceptable within the faith. In the sixth section he shows us an example of two people in love. They are not taught how to behave towards each other; it is only faith and confidence in what they are doing. He asks people to live in confidence toward God. I agree with equal works, but this causes me to question what is done within faith or just for greed. How many churches have I tithed to that will use my money for an unholy purpose? How will we ever know the righteous from the wicked within our own boundaries? I love the way he uses two people in love to display the confidence we should have towards God, but it seems like we should have a lot more confidence towards God, by leaving our life and afterlife in his hands.
In the seventh and eighth section, Martin Luther preaches that through our sufferings that God has not abandoned us. He tells that suffering in works is a great thing in Christianity. In section eight he talks of Gods punishments and what they might mean to him. He also writes that people so often base their faith on good works and not the divine purpose behind them. I agree, some people only do good things to gain something back from them. Its sad to see people forced to help others and