Essay About Gossip Technique And Effective Gossip

The Rule of Legal Analysis
The Rule of Legal Analysis
Law students are told to argue both side of the issue, in the
analysis. Students interpret this advice, by writing, “Plaintiff
will argue .. Defendant will argue ………,” througout their
essays.
Not at all effective.
Think about it. Plaintiff will argue.. that they are right.
Defendant will argue.. that plaintiff is wrong.
There often is no REAL ANALYSIS in such a student essay.
THE GOSSIP TECHNIQUE.
An effective Gossip will never start out saying something bad about
someone. Gossips are familiar with Goulds Second Law of
HumanDynamics. They know that if they say something bad about Bo
right of the bat, the reaction of the Gossipee will be to respond
that Bo is a good guy, through Goulds Second Law “Every Human
Action Will Induce an Equal and Opposite Reaction.”
Therefore, a good Gossip always starts out saying something Good
about Bo.
For example, “Bo is a great guy. You should see how much he does
for charity. On most days, you would be hard pressed to find a more
caring and wonderful guy…”
Now, by the time the gossip gets a few sentences into how great Bo
is, the other person is begging the Gossip to “give them the dirt on
Bo.”
Likewise, the Gossip Technique.
Take the breaking and entering aspect of burglary. If you have want
to conclude this issue by saying a breaking and entering was
present, then you start first by reasoning there is NO breaking and
entering:
To Wit:
“At first glance, it appears as though a breaking did not occur, as
defendant did not break anything, and they only opened a screen door
before walking in the house.”
Makes sense. The above is exactly what the defendant will assert.
And you are not wasting time with the empty phrasing of “Defendant
will argue..”
Now, quickly pivot, and go in the opposite direction: