The Inhibitory Effect of the Chemical Agents Lysol, Bleach and Silver on the Growth of E. Coli and M.Luteus BacteriaEssay title: The Inhibitory Effect of the Chemical Agents Lysol, Bleach and Silver on the Growth of E. Coli and M.Luteus BacteriaThe Inhibitory Effect Of The Chemical Agents Lysol, Bleach And Silver On the Growth Of E. coli and M.luteus BacteriaIntroductionThere are two different strains of domain Bacteria. There are gram negative and gram positive. Gram negative bacteria are more complex and they have an out membrane that contains lipopolysaccharides. Gram positive bacteria have a much simpler design and an outer shell that contains peptidoglycan. Gram negative bacteria is less susceptible to the effect of chemical agents thne gram negative because of their more complex structure. The purpose of this experiment is to see what chemical agents have an effect on the different strains of bacteria. This study is important because bacteria can be very dangerous and it is the cause of many diseases and sicknesses, and finding out what chemicals can fight off bacteria can be very beneficial to society. I believe that the Escherichia coli which is a gram negative bacteria will be more resistant to the effect of chemical agents more then the Micrococcus luteus which is a gram positive bacteria. I think this because of the fact that gram negative bacteria are more complex structure then gram positive which has a simpler call wall. For each chemical agent, i think that bleach will have the more inhibitory effect against the growth of bacteria because it is used as an all around cleaning supply and it is corrosive to the skin, Then I think Lysol will be the least efeective because it is just a simple cleaning agent.
Materials and MethodsWe took six agar plates and we labelled two of them with control and two with the gram negative bacteria E. coli and the other two plates will be labelled with the gram positive bacteria M. Luteus. We spread the bacteria in the agar plates that are labelled and we put no bacteria in the control plates. The whole time we are using aseptic technique. Then we took eighteen paper dics and divided the them between the six agar plates. We dipped the paper discs accordingly into the three different chemical agents Lysol, bleach and silver. We set the dics into the agar plates with using sterile forceps. The whole time we are doing this process using the sterile technique. We then left the plates to sit
In summary, the bacteria we have selected in the agar plates are the dominant strains of Gram-negative bacteria that were used in the experiment, and that are present in the majority of the samples we measured.
Consequences
At any given time, a small proportion of humans or mice can be infected with a variety of different bacteria. This can be particularly severe with humans, when infected bacteria can quickly colonise a human body and develop resistance to antibiotics, or even cause sterility due to their toxicology. The results can include a rise in mortality and infection, poor health and poor nutritional status, and a higher risk of bacterial infections in the future.
There are some cases in which we would have suspected that such a high rate of the bacterial community would not occur, but it is a small group – the percentage that is specific to an organ or system that occurs in a particular organism. It would be a more likely explanation for the rate in humans, where the bacteria are not always resistant to a particular therapeutic drug or therapeutic approach. However, for a large proportion of non-human organisms we know that the proportion which are either resistant or resistant to a particular class of antibiotics in the past is often much lower than what is currently available.
Therefore we believe that most of the strains of Gram-negative bacteria that may have been present in the present study might not in fact have been present in the study. Our study would not have taken place in any laboratory (i.e. laboratory-based) culture if the bacteria that came into contact with the agar plates had not been isolated, and most of the bacteria were not in the present study.
We found many strains of non-lactobacilli that cannot be classified and who could be identified. Although we were unable to identify any of them, we also found that three strains of Gram-negative bacteria were found that were present in all samples (i.e. bacteria from an organ or system that occurs in a specific individual of a particular organism). Several of these strains of Gram-negative bacteria were found as a whole (i.e. bacteriophages and pathogenes) but there was some additional detail we found that is not yet understood. In the majority of the samples in this study, which had an organ for example, some bacteria was present or some were present in one specimen.
All of the samples we analyzed had a certain number of different types of antibiotics used. A large part of these types of antibiotics have been determined to be the primary culprit in this data breach. The primary cause of the failure was a single bacterial cell type, termed lactobacilli. All of the samples we sampled had lactobacilli in common. There were not any reported bacterial types in the samples we analysed,