Great Chicago FireEssay Preview: Great Chicago FireReport this essayGreat Chicago FireI have no passion or desire to write about a thunderous destruction of a city or the death of hundreds of people. Yes, I have no connection to this topic, besides my home being 30 minutes from downtown Chicago, but that does not mean that this fire does not pertain to me or anyone who lives in a completely different state for that matter. So, just because I have never experienced a disaster of this magnitude does not mean that my lips should stay shut regarding the topic of the Great Chicago Fire. What must be done is to look at events and, for that matter, life in a certain perspective that is not always one-sided. This one-sidedness can come from focusing on a particular outcome without realizing what else can come from that desired outcome.
HISTORY:
The American Civil War is a tragic American history. It includes the aftermath of slavery, which led to the civil rights act of signing the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which ended segregation of the Civil War between the two states and ended the Jim Crow of the 1930’s. However, the Civil Rights Act was actually a program of “black and white.” As a result of federal laws against racism, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People was founded, leading to the passage of the Civil Rights Act in 1967. The Civil Rights Act, passed in 1964, prohibited discrimination of all types in public employment or employment with an African American and denied federal assistance to any non-white race. However, while the first 50 years of President Johnson’s administration continued the policies of the NAA, discrimination of minority groups and groups of people, including women and handicapped people, resulted in the passage of the S.E.C. into law, which has continued to be the cornerstone of a federal government that continues to function under civil and federal law.
As a result of these policies, the African Americans and the handicapped had their own state, county and state systems. However, they never understood that their state and local systems depended entirely on their African American or handicapped neighbors, so no one seemed to care for their economic well-being.
At that time, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was not only about the Civil Rights Act, but specifically about equality. The Civil Rights Act was a massive expansion of federal power, the first step in a massive and often disastrous policy that would eventually end the civil rights movement. Moreover, as states signed up to the NAA, state and local politicians became aware of the extent to which it threatened their local economies and their lives, or in other words, that other states had laws which could also affect or negatively affect them. Thus, the NAA and subsequent policies were more important than any economic or political gains the white, South was making throughout the South to the detriment of their African American and handicapped neighbors.
While federal agents were investigating racism in the area, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was only just beginning, and in 1964, as a result of the Civil Rights Act, the federal government was now in action to enforce civil rights laws against white people of any race regardless of their African American or handicapped background. In other words, the government had created and implemented a war-centric enforcement system. In fact, when the civil rights laws had already been used against black people for their African American or handicapped background and as part of federal civil rights enforcement, white people were being targeted for legal reprisals and fines.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was not interested in enforcing the racial discrimination laws against whites in the area, that is, rather, the FBI was interested only in trying to bring down black people over the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This was not only in the case of some of the Southern states that did not have the NAA, but also with respect to other states, such as Nebraska, Alabama and Rhode Island.
That is, for all the federal action, the law did not prohibit the federal government from enforcing civil rights
HISTORY:
The American Civil War is a tragic American history. It includes the aftermath of slavery, which led to the civil rights act of signing the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which ended segregation of the Civil War between the two states and ended the Jim Crow of the 1930’s. However, the Civil Rights Act was actually a program of “black and white.” As a result of federal laws against racism, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People was founded, leading to the passage of the Civil Rights Act in 1967. The Civil Rights Act, passed in 1964, prohibited discrimination of all types in public employment or employment with an African American and denied federal assistance to any non-white race. However, while the first 50 years of President Johnson’s administration continued the policies of the NAA, discrimination of minority groups and groups of people, including women and handicapped people, resulted in the passage of the S.E.C. into law, which has continued to be the cornerstone of a federal government that continues to function under civil and federal law.
As a result of these policies, the African Americans and the handicapped had their own state, county and state systems. However, they never understood that their state and local systems depended entirely on their African American or handicapped neighbors, so no one seemed to care for their economic well-being.
At that time, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was not only about the Civil Rights Act, but specifically about equality. The Civil Rights Act was a massive expansion of federal power, the first step in a massive and often disastrous policy that would eventually end the civil rights movement. Moreover, as states signed up to the NAA, state and local politicians became aware of the extent to which it threatened their local economies and their lives, or in other words, that other states had laws which could also affect or negatively affect them. Thus, the NAA and subsequent policies were more important than any economic or political gains the white, South was making throughout the South to the detriment of their African American and handicapped neighbors.
While federal agents were investigating racism in the area, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was only just beginning, and in 1964, as a result of the Civil Rights Act, the federal government was now in action to enforce civil rights laws against white people of any race regardless of their African American or handicapped background. In other words, the government had created and implemented a war-centric enforcement system. In fact, when the civil rights laws had already been used against black people for their African American or handicapped background and as part of federal civil rights enforcement, white people were being targeted for legal reprisals and fines.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was not interested in enforcing the racial discrimination laws against whites in the area, that is, rather, the FBI was interested only in trying to bring down black people over the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This was not only in the case of some of the Southern states that did not have the NAA, but also with respect to other states, such as Nebraska, Alabama and Rhode Island.
That is, for all the federal action, the law did not prohibit the federal government from enforcing civil rights
The Great Chicago Fire occurred during October 8th and 9th of 1871. The weeks leading up to this disaster were spent with an extremely watchful eye on the city due to the lack of rain. So, one spark or one small fire could start an extremely large fire because of how much wood had been used to build the city. There were even warnings given in form of a building inspection department idea that would inform the city that the buildings were “shoddily constructed firetraps”, according to the Tribune at the time. However, the city did nothing about the proposed problem of a dangerous fire breakout and paid the price.
It came to the evening of October 8th, 1871 and the table had been set. It is still unclear how the fire had started because one newspaper claimed that a cow kicked over a lantern to start a barn on fire. However, that newspaper retracted their claims when charges of slander surfaced. The fact of the matter is, it started on the West Side of the city and in a short while had burned through a block of homes were burned down. As happens in all fires, the heat increased and elevated causing what William Ogden described as, “the fiercest Tornado of Win ever known to blow here.” (Public Broadcasting System). From there, a piece of debris was flown onto an oil tanker located across the river in the North Side. The North Side was ablaze. It was a terrible night for many of the residents of the city of Chicago and is one that will go down in infamy until the end of time. The final totals for the fire were at the minimum 300 deaths, 70,000 buildings burned to the ground, 100 thousand people forced to homelessness, 73 miles of street were incinerated, and 200 million dollars in damage.
There are many examples of struggle and despair during the fire, but there is one that I found very compelling. This excerpt from a letter written by a businessman from Chicago in 1871 brought into account the amount of people who came back and tried to save their precious belongings instead of focusing on getting out of town. The man in this example was able to sneak away with his life but faced some very close to death moments.
“…I therefore started on my return, but, besides having to walk over ground almost too heated to walk on, and through burning piles of merchandise, I presently encountered such a shower of cinders, dense smoke, and driven sand (every grain of which seemed to me impelled with a force sufficient to make it sink in the skin) that from sheer disagreeability, if not necessity, and fearing my clothes would take fire, I concluded to desist from any further effort to save the residue of my effects.”
Another example from the businessman’s letter shows what the effects of the fire were on the people who were in Chicago at that time. Keep in mind he originally thought he was in no harm, because of how frequent fires were in Chicago due to the use of wood throughout the city and the dryness of the city. Then, before he knew it he was directly in the grasp of the flames and suffered consequences similar to many other people.
“…I was so blackened that you might have taken me for a stoker; face, hands, hair, and clothes were covered with grit and soot; and my eyes literally bleeding, from the double effect of the sand sticking in them and the inflammation produced by the heat and the smoke. My wife, obtaining some milk, bathed my eyes. I have no doubt I looked and felt as you and some of your comrades may have done, after a heavy battleвЂ¦Ð²Ð‚Ñœ
The aftermath of the fire was extremely devastating as the remaining citizens of the city looked around at what was once a bustling, popular, and successful simply gone after two days of fire. I know if I was there and had just possibly lost my friends and family in the fire, I don’t know if I could live there longer or have any desire to rebuild the city. However, Chicagoans did not wait around to feel pity for themselves they simply got back up after being knocked down and went to work. Not only did the city itself unite towards the common goal of building itself back up, but the entire country shared the same desire for the city. Relief was sent in the direction of the city in forms of money, supplies, and any other aid that was necessary to put Chicago back on the map of the great Western cities. I believe the reason the response was so strong from the rest of the country was because of how the rest of the country viewed Chicago. It was viewed as new and futuristic. It was what the rest of the cities of the country wanted to be. They wanted to be in the center of all trade, new businesses, and other amazing opportunities for happiness and wealth. If this city fell and never rose out of the ashes then what would happen to the rest of the cities who dreamed of being just like Chicago? Initially, the effort was to get the city back to where it was before the fire struck, but while they were at it they made it one of the