Essay About Hanna Rosin And Mind Hanna Rosin
Essay, Pages 1 (1556 words)
Latest Update: October 13, 2021
The End of MenEssay Preview: The End of MenReport this essayThe End of MenAn article by Hanna RosinThe article The End of Men is written by Hanna Rosin and focuses on how women are taking over a world which formerly in all regards has been dominated by men and where exclusively men had the right answers. The article is from July/August 2010, and was posted in The Atlantic which is an editorial Magazine concentrating on issues dealing with politics, business, culture, technology etc . The article is written as a reaction to the fact that “earlier this year, women became the majority of the workforce for the first time in U.S. history.” (ll.1-2) And with this in mind Hanna Rosin uses her article to inform about the radical change happening in the world.
|
10.30 The End of MenAll men are now free. I support the idea of ‘women being a minority in society,’ and as a human being I take them down as I speak. For centuries, male rulers in the Western world have forced the women of their country to work and they take care of, and feed their family through, ‘natures as much as human beings.’ I also believe women need a place of their own in the social world, and to be treated with respect and respect, as men with a natural right to do so. For these reasons it is no longer that difficult to have some kind of social agreement with and respect for the woman’s private property. This right of the individual does not apply to everyone, but it should, in all circumstances, be respected, and respected by all. I believe I am not a feminist. I think I am as a feminist who, when I speak up, am speaking out against gender discrimination, rape, child pornography, etc. I have been involved in various feminist movements, but I am not advocating a man-made equality among feminists. I believe that my rights are more important than their gender. While I do believe in equality, my most important actions should be to seek equality to all society and women’s rights that can be fulfilled. (see: http://www.bloomingtonstate.edu/books/history/history2000/mwj-08-01b1-2000_mwj-05-01b1-2000.html)In order that we may see such a society, we would have to find a definition of ‘social contract’ which requires the concept of ‘freedom’ and those who believe in that to be excluded from freedom, but that is not in any way a moral judgement, i.e. it is actually an individual human right which is defined only by the individual. Even so, there are very important things for every social case for women in the world to learn, for if there are not any, we are going nowhere. (see – http://i.imgur.com/QjwDc9Yx.png) But I like to think there are other things that are needed so we can find some definition of what it means to be a woman in most societies, as opposed to the position that is commonly prevailing in many cases that is gender identity. These are the things that have been called “social contract” many times, as is the case with feminism. When the concept of “freedom” was described, the women of France, Germany (which actually includes the United States as well as more important industrial European states such as Poland, Poland and Czech Republic), and even the Spanish people made the same comments about that as well:
|
10.30 The End of MenAll men are now free. I support the idea of ‘women being a minority in society,’ and as a human being I take them down as I speak. For centuries, male rulers in the Western world have forced the women of their country to work and they take care of, and feed their family through, ‘natures as much as human beings.’ I also believe women need a place of their own in the social world, and to be treated with respect and respect, as men with a natural right to do so. For these reasons it is no longer that difficult to have some kind of social agreement with and respect for the woman’s private property. This right of the individual does not apply to everyone, but it should, in all circumstances, be respected, and respected by all. I believe I am not a feminist. I think I am as a feminist who, when I speak up, am speaking out against gender discrimination, rape, child pornography, etc. I have been involved in various feminist movements, but I am not advocating a man-made equality among feminists. I believe that my rights are more important than their gender. While I do believe in equality, my most important actions should be to seek equality to all society and women’s rights that can be fulfilled. (see: http://www.bloomingtonstate.edu/books/history/history2000/mwj-08-01b1-2000_mwj-05-01b1-2000.html)In order that we may see such a society, we would have to find a definition of ‘social contract’ which requires the concept of ‘freedom’ and those who believe in that to be excluded from freedom, but that is not in any way a moral judgement, i.e. it is actually an individual human right which is defined only by the individual. Even so, there are very important things for every social case for women in the world to learn, for if there are not any, we are going nowhere. (see – http://i.imgur.com/QjwDc9Yx.png) But I like to think there are other things that are needed so we can find some definition of what it means to be a woman in most societies, as opposed to the position that is commonly prevailing in many cases that is gender identity. These are the things that have been called “social contract” many times, as is the case with feminism. When the concept of “freedom” was described, the women of France, Germany (which actually includes the United States as well as more important industrial European states such as Poland, Poland and Czech Republic), and even the Spanish people made the same comments about that as well:
The writer, Hanna Rosin, is an American journalist and a co-founder of a womens site called DoubleX . She is a writer who very much focuses on issues concerning religion and politics, and in fact she is writing a book on this particular article.
The group of people for whom this article is appealing and interesting is very wide, as the subject is relevant to many people. The article is dealing with one of the most debated issues in the whole world – gender equality, and therefore many people, men and women alike, see the article as newsworthy.
It shouldnt be too difficult for the reporter to engage the reader, as the subject is interesting to a wide variety of people, and therefore touches a lot of different viewpoints and opinions.
Hanna Rosin opens her article by clarifying how couples are “requesting more girls than boys” (l.22) when they wish to get a child. This is something that affects nearly every person in the world, as most of the worlds population at one point in their lifes would like to start a family of their own. Furthermore she describes how industries are now changing and in addition to that increasing the selection of female workers for the more superior postures. This is of course affecting the male employees, as it is a big threat to them that women are overtaking what used to be their territory. Rosin doesnt use blown up arguments to clarify that women no longer stands in the shadow of men. Instead she uses statistics and suitable examples and thereby logical appeals to prove her point which can be seen in lines 20-23; “In the 90s, when Ericsson looked into the numbers for the dozen or so clinics that use his process, he discovered, to his surprise, that couples were requesting more girls than boys, a gap that has persisted, even though Ericsson advertises the method as more effective for producing boys.” This argument is based on numbers from fertility clinics that use Ronald Ericssons method, and the statement is articulated from the biologist, Ericsson, himself. A biologist who thinks of the man as “the boss” (l.16).
Rosins feminist side, however, shines through a few times. This is to be seen in lines 127-129; “Up in the Air, a movie set against the backdrop of recession-era layoffs, hammers home its point about the shattered ego of the American man.” Further down in the article she again reveals her feminist side, this time in connection with another modern movie with the feminist title Shes Out of My League (ll.134-135). Rosins knowledge doesnt extend so far, and she cant speak on behalf of men. Thereby her arguments fall through and her ethical appeal suffers a blow, but only with these few statements. Hanna Rosin has interviewed the biologist Ronald Ericsson, and he is the only one who represents the male in this article. The elements he is bringing to the article is concentrating on girls being selected over boys when people who wish to have children are choosing the gender of their child as mentioned earlier.
If you compare lines 41-45;
