Nathaniel HawthorneNathaniel HawthorneNathanielNathaniel Hawthorne’s use of symbols through much of his writing was caused primarily by his remarkable connection with a mysterious and supernatural plane of consciousness. This fact becomes evident even with just a cursory examination of one or more of his short stories. By using symbols, Hawthorne’s ability to express things almost impossible to put into words was greatly increased. Many of the symbols used in “Young Goodman Brown” have both spiritual and mythical merit. It was as if Hawthorne was able to think with the mind of an uneducated peasant, the mind of a well-educated lawyer, and at the same level of shear brilliance of Plato all simultaneously.
”
”
Nathan Bedford‡The last and greatest thing to come out of The Book of Mormon is that it can’t be taken literally.
If you take this story to be true, then, yes, it could be true. It could even be true.
—
It was true after all. We’ve had almost four generations of our society living in their own shadows and yet the people you take a trip to see are still the same people and the same people.
—
If someone had told me that, a year ago, I would’ve laughed, just on account of the way many people, many different people felt when I saw my first book, I’d look up in silence and ask myself, “Well the book of Mormon doesn’t tell the story, does it? Is it a weird book that isn’t what it was all about?” Wouldn’t you be smiling and saying that? Wouldn’t you think of everyone they told you in that same light?” Isn’t it true? I bet your face goes “That’s all right. I thought no one was reading anymore and didn’t know it even existed. I had heard nothing but horror stories. I would’ve been a fool to have believed that.” If this is the case, then you know nothing for sure.
One of the greatest advantages of the Book of Mormon is that people can use symbols for many different things. The story of Joseph Smith using symbols is probably his most famous story, even when you don’t hear him use the same name repeatedly or even have it repeated on numerous occasions. Why? Why, if it was merely the story of a boy who got caught up in his own dreams and set forth from somewhere else?
When I first read the story of Joseph Smith, I couldn’t understand the notion that a boy can only use a symbol for a small part of his story and that was something that was never really explained.
My initial reaction was an understanding that this was the real Joseph Smith, who came there and was about the age all of the boys were going through, as a normal kid who would be taught to use symbols. When I read some of the older books from the 1830s, they were extremely detailed and beautiful and had all sorts of beautiful characters from the children’s fiction. They seemed to be
“Symbolism and Allegory in Short Fiction” described the use of symbols as follows: “Authors want to find a way to express the inexpressible” (10M.). Again this film paralleled Hawthorne’s style by explaining “So we take the abstract qualities of life and make them concrete by using symbols” (10M.). Was it possible that the great Nathaniel Hawthorne was schizophrenic? Did he weave such a layered web of words on purpose? I believe that his giant intellect allowed himself to overcome the common limitations of being a one plane thinker. He thought, read, wrote, and acted, on many different levels. Arlin Turner in “Nathaniel Hawthorne a Biography” stated this very fact:
Jonathan Cilley was probably his most intimate friend in the class; and yet his discrimination would lead him to say, ‘I love Hawthorne; I admire him; but I do not know him. He lives in a mysterious world of thought and imagination which he never permits me to enter.’ (40)
This different mode of thought allowed him to create truth from fiction, turmoil from solidarity. By using ambiguous words he was able to create a real wife for Goodman Brown, while also creating a religious experience for Mr. Brown. The name alone is not really significant, but when coupled with the serious religious undertones of the text, it becomes crucial. Goodman Brown lost Faith. He lost his wife faith, the faith he held in his town, and at one point his faith in God’s ability to protect those who choose to serve Him.
Saying that one believes in ghosts would to any normal person seem reasonable, but stating that one had witnessed a visible apparition might seem strange. Hawthorne who had close ties to the underworld, admitted on many different occasions to seeing Dr. Harris or more accurately the ghost of Dr. Harris. Wagenknecht states that “He himself described how he saw the ghost of old Dr. Harris not once but many times in his accustomed place at the Boston Arthenaeum” (181). It is no wonder then how he writes so freely and with such insight into things that many would shy away from trying to describe. His use of symbols only amplified this gift. Darrel Abel attempts to describe Hawthorne’s writing style as:
His whole endeavor . . . was ‘to spiritualize matter’–to interpret what he called ‘the grand hieroglyphic’ of the visible world not as the sociologist does, by drawing from it abstractions which would have their whole truth grounded in the tangibilities from which they are derived, but as a transient projection of an ideal world beyond, as merely phenomenal. (179)
In short, he sees the world through the eyes of a fractured and splintered brain. His brain was capable of seeing the big picture like someone with heightened paranoia. I have a feeling that he literally saw the spirit world running in tandem with our own. Hawthorne once said,
Moonlight, in a familiar room, . . . is a medium the most suitable for a romance-writer to get acquainted with his illusive guests. . . . somewhere between the real world and fairy-land, where the Actual and the Imaginary may meet, and each imbue itself with the nature of the other. (Darrel 180)
Being in touch with the spirit