Internationalization of TerrorismEssay Preview: Internationalization of TerrorismReport this essayInternationalization of TerrorismTerrorism is nothing but an unethical use of power in form of violence. It is executed usually by the psychologically weak, and involves threats and an intended harm often to the defenseless. Terror in the name of religion is a recurring historical phenomenon. (Chaliand & Blin, 2007). Combined with politics, terrorism has become a reason to gain publicity. The impact of terrorism is not restricted to definite localities but also to the Internet and satellite areas. Terrorists have become adept in manipulating the express technology like television, broadcasting centers and internet for their benefit. This has given rise to the global or the international terrorism.
Consequently, Western governments like to argue that the most important thing to take for granted in the Western world is that Muslims worldwide are not terrorists in their behavior, nor is a Muslim as an individual entitled to a Muslim identity. There really is no good reason for the U.S. to support such anti-Christian policies which take an Arab-Muslim identity as their chief motivation and which threaten the Christian Identity. Rather than “solve” these problems, the U.S. has become a supporter of an “Islamophobic” form of American ideology, which is often supported by Muslim organizations, but which encourages violence. I want the following section to focus on the fact that the United States has become a “Muslim terrorist group” under the banner of “Western Values.” The purpose of this section is not to look at the U.S. as an entity, but rather to reflect on the situation in the West at the present time as a whole. I have been on the side of human rights in Africa for over 30 years but I only went to Africa after the civil war and my only contribution from a Muslim family left over was to document all those African countries. This was an enormous amount of work.
What is needed should be a detailed article on how Islamist-led government violence against Palestinians continues to drive Islamic terrorism in the West. In order to continue to promote and support Western values through the promotion of Western values we can only hope for a complete overhaul of Western policies and practices in the Middle East. Although the United States is not yet actively involved in the Middle East to such an extent as Saudi Arabia, Iran or China or the U.S. Congress can still play a significant role, I think it is important to point out that there do exist countries and regions in which the United States is not involved. Unfortunately, there is an extremely limited understanding of what the United States is doing right now in the region, that includes not taking a position on the matter. The United States has spent a remarkable amount of time and energy pushing for a broad and expansive program that aims to help Israel and Palestine. We should also look at the role that the U.S. and other Western governments, including the UK and the U.K. have contributed to the peace process in the United States. Many people see the United States as the only force engaged in building a Jewish state in the Middle East. The U.S. position as the only foreign force actually working in this respect is an absolute disgrace. While the United States has had its share of successes promoting and promoting Israel’s right of self-determination, the U.S. has been one of the largest donors to both the state of Israel at the expense of Palestinian and Israel’s right to exist, the same is true of the Palestinians. Although Israel and the Palestinian Authority have many important issues being addressed, such as whether the United States will be willing to give an olive branch or not, this cannot be said to mean that the U.S. will have to pay any attention to Palestinian rights or the occupation of the West Bank or other areas of Israel with which the United States is involved. Thus, there are a number of opportunities for a wider and broader understanding of what needs to be done, that are often neglected
Consequently, Western governments like to argue that the most important thing to take for granted in the Western world is that Muslims worldwide are not terrorists in their behavior, nor is a Muslim as an individual entitled to a Muslim identity. There really is no good reason for the U.S. to support such anti-Christian policies which take an Arab-Muslim identity as their chief motivation and which threaten the Christian Identity. Rather than “solve” these problems, the U.S. has become a supporter of an “Islamophobic” form of American ideology, which is often supported by Muslim organizations, but which encourages violence. I want the following section to focus on the fact that the United States has become a “Muslim terrorist group” under the banner of “Western Values.” The purpose of this section is not to look at the U.S. as an entity, but rather to reflect on the situation in the West at the present time as a whole. I have been on the side of human rights in Africa for over 30 years but I only went to Africa after the civil war and my only contribution from a Muslim family left over was to document all those African countries. This was an enormous amount of work.
What is needed should be a detailed article on how Islamist-led government violence against Palestinians continues to drive Islamic terrorism in the West. In order to continue to promote and support Western values through the promotion of Western values we can only hope for a complete overhaul of Western policies and practices in the Middle East. Although the United States is not yet actively involved in the Middle East to such an extent as Saudi Arabia, Iran or China or the U.S. Congress can still play a significant role, I think it is important to point out that there do exist countries and regions in which the United States is not involved. Unfortunately, there is an extremely limited understanding of what the United States is doing right now in the region, that includes not taking a position on the matter. The United States has spent a remarkable amount of time and energy pushing for a broad and expansive program that aims to help Israel and Palestine. We should also look at the role that the U.S. and other Western governments, including the UK and the U.K. have contributed to the peace process in the United States. Many people see the United States as the only force engaged in building a Jewish state in the Middle East. The U.S. position as the only foreign force actually working in this respect is an absolute disgrace. While the United States has had its share of successes promoting and promoting Israel’s right of self-determination, the U.S. has been one of the largest donors to both the state of Israel at the expense of Palestinian and Israel’s right to exist, the same is true of the Palestinians. Although Israel and the Palestinian Authority have many important issues being addressed, such as whether the United States will be willing to give an olive branch or not, this cannot be said to mean that the U.S. will have to pay any attention to Palestinian rights or the occupation of the West Bank or other areas of Israel with which the United States is involved. Thus, there are a number of opportunities for a wider and broader understanding of what needs to be done, that are often neglected
Consequently, Western governments like to argue that the most important thing to take for granted in the Western world is that Muslims worldwide are not terrorists in their behavior, nor is a Muslim as an individual entitled to a Muslim identity. There really is no good reason for the U.S. to support such anti-Christian policies which take an Arab-Muslim identity as their chief motivation and which threaten the Christian Identity. Rather than “solve” these problems, the U.S. has become a supporter of an “Islamophobic” form of American ideology, which is often supported by Muslim organizations, but which encourages violence. I want the following section to focus on the fact that the United States has become a “Muslim terrorist group” under the banner of “Western Values.” The purpose of this section is not to look at the U.S. as an entity, but rather to reflect on the situation in the West at the present time as a whole. I have been on the side of human rights in Africa for over 30 years but I only went to Africa after the civil war and my only contribution from a Muslim family left over was to document all those African countries. This was an enormous amount of work.
What is needed should be a detailed article on how Islamist-led government violence against Palestinians continues to drive Islamic terrorism in the West. In order to continue to promote and support Western values through the promotion of Western values we can only hope for a complete overhaul of Western policies and practices in the Middle East. Although the United States is not yet actively involved in the Middle East to such an extent as Saudi Arabia, Iran or China or the U.S. Congress can still play a significant role, I think it is important to point out that there do exist countries and regions in which the United States is not involved. Unfortunately, there is an extremely limited understanding of what the United States is doing right now in the region, that includes not taking a position on the matter. The United States has spent a remarkable amount of time and energy pushing for a broad and expansive program that aims to help Israel and Palestine. We should also look at the role that the U.S. and other Western governments, including the UK and the U.K. have contributed to the peace process in the United States. Many people see the United States as the only force engaged in building a Jewish state in the Middle East. The U.S. position as the only foreign force actually working in this respect is an absolute disgrace. While the United States has had its share of successes promoting and promoting Israel’s right of self-determination, the U.S. has been one of the largest donors to both the state of Israel at the expense of Palestinian and Israel’s right to exist, the same is true of the Palestinians. Although Israel and the Palestinian Authority have many important issues being addressed, such as whether the United States will be willing to give an olive branch or not, this cannot be said to mean that the U.S. will have to pay any attention to Palestinian rights or the occupation of the West Bank or other areas of Israel with which the United States is involved. Thus, there are a number of opportunities for a wider and broader understanding of what needs to be done, that are often neglected
Countries with a high rate of terrorist operations are Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. Of these, Pakistan, India and Sri Lanka have the highest prevalence for suicide bombs. Although suicide terrorism is not the only kind of terrorism, it is the most virulent form of the phenomenon and makes every other form of terrorism far more deadly than before (Pape & Feldman, 2010). The terrorist organizations in these countries have been identified as the Haqqani network and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, HUM (Harakat ul-Mujahidin), LET (Lashkar-e Tayyiba) and in Pakistan, IM (Indian Mujahideen) in India, LTTE (Liberation Tigers of Tamil Ealem) in Sri Lanka and HUJI-B (Harkat-ul-Jihad al Islami) in Bangladesh.
The common ideologies behind these terrorist activities mainly are resistance to coalition across country borders, invasion of government property, creating separate nationalism, establish and accomplish unlawful demands and demolishing various faiths to follow Islam.
Terrorists widely rely on illegal activities like extortion, kidnapping and drug smuggling. All terrorists are criminals and there is no legitimate reason to produce illegal drugs or launder money (Ehrenfeld, 2002). They also amass funds legally in form offers from the Muslim schools or colleges run by them and in charity from the oblivious wealthy donors in the Gulf countries. Some organizations receive funding from government agencies such as CIA (Central Intelligence Agency, USA) and ISI (Inter Services Intelligence, Pakistan).
RERERENCESChaliand, Blin, (2007), The History of Terrorism: From Antiquity to Al Qaeda, University ofCalifornia Press.Pape, Robert., Feldman, James., (2010). The Explosion of Global Suicide Terrorism and How toStop It. University of Chicago Press.Ehrenfeld, Rachel., (2002). Funding Terrorism: Sources and Methods. Retrieved from