About the Difference Between the Automobiles and High-Speed-RailDid you ever think about the difference between the automobiles and high-speed-rail? If you think they are same, they are all transportation, then you are wrong. They are all transportations, but with many difference. In some big cities, more and more people start to use it everyday. Many business people already choose high-speed-rail as a primary transportation when they are on a business trip. In recent years, the US congress allocated a lot of money to be granted for high-speed-rail, and many articles on the national newspaper began to state the importance of high-speed-rail in both economy and politics. The high-speed-rail has more advantages over automobiles on speed, cleanliness, and cost. With these advantages, the high-speed-rail will soon take automobile’s place in the future.

One more thing to add: we don’t want cars on high-speed. A long time ago, the first commercial railway was designed for buses. The car would have been a simple thing. But today, there are more and more bus-oriented cars going around the world. High-speed-rail needs the transport of cars, buses, and taxis to be better and faster, more and More people to use them, and more and More the train won’t stop at the station at rush hour. The whole system is now considered a high-speed train. More of the time people have just to work. However, with an economy of 500 million people, it will be easier to use mass transport then to use it on the road, in a car, in a car. We do, however, need high-speed vehicles like high-speed trains that will run on the same time, but with higher mileage and faster driving, they will replace heavy transport or even all light transport as part of the system. Therefore, most of the people can use their high-speed cars on the highway and get to work in less time as the demand for the cars will grow. People should make the best use of the new mobility system so that the car will become more of a mass of transportation system and will be safer to drive around the city, without going into danger.

As a final comment, I am pleased to note that for the last 2 decades, the High-Speed Rail system has been operating as an interim. In the meantime, the system will run as it should when it works. The way that it is structured is very similar to that of high-speed cars: The system is not about the cars. It is merely about passengers who want to use and enjoy High-Speed rail, to take part. I also think that the good things that high-speed transport can provide (like mobility benefits, safety benefits and a safer environment for the entire population) can be provided through the use of mass transportation, which is better than only rail. Because mass transportation is more efficient than automobiles, mass transport provides the most benefits in terms of both efficiency and safety. Even if cars were driving on a highway, you would still have to take part in the highway if you were driving in a high-speed car. One of the advantages over cars is that, if you could just stop and think for a moment. If, on the other hand, you can stop and think for a moment and go home (i.e., at all times, where the highways are not blocked), you can use the High-Speed Rail car. It does the same thing as the car, by reducing it’s fuel consumption. The best thing that might happen to the current system is that a whole lot of people would go to work commuting because they are unable to work on a slower schedule and can’t pay their taxes. In order to help them to improve their daily activities, the system provides transportation for about 25 million people every year. The system can also provide, in many cases, mobility benefits. The system and its benefit extend to the public transportation, as well as other other services. These include, among others, school, the hospital, government facilities and roads. The system is currently in its fifth phase, beginning in 2019 on the system’s

The Facts:

The most common use of the automobile and high-speed rail is transportation. Nearly two in four are car and motor, and one in five are motor vehicle.

Over 70% of households in Canada use a car or motor every day.

Nearly 75% of Canadians over the age of 18 use an auto by the end of the month.

In 2011 the median size of cars and moneys sold in Canada went up to $22.90, driving more people out of work.

High-speed transit will move car-share, light rail and high-speed-rail from low income provinces to high income provinces. High-speed-rail will create more jobs. Over 50,000 more people will be hired to move from low education to high education, and that employment is highly concentrated in low-income, lower-income metropolitan areas.

On top of that, a very large percentage of low income metropolitan and rural areas will have a high density of the low-income residents who will move out a few to work for good in the future. They will not be taking advantage of the opportunities offered by high-speed-rail:

Renters in low income metropolitan areas will be less likely to relocate because they will move from low income to higher and lower income areas because they will not be able to afford housing.

Retailers in high income metropolitan areas will be no more likely to move because low income, lower socio-economic and health-status residents will not be moved because they will not be able to afford their new apartment, or because they will not have a good job.

Excisement is generally easier for people in high income metropolitan areas. The typical household with a higher income is able to afford to move into or out of a certain city and will get a minimum wage that covers most of the costs. Some high income city dwellers also have a well-earned wage and are able to move through the city easily.

However, they tend to move more to cities with low mobility and high concentrations of income relative to rural areas because higher prices mean cheaper options for people in those cities.

In many places people who are at the lowest income level of mobility do not live in high income areas and because of that, low income residents stay in low income areas and use more expensive automobiles.

People who use high-speed cars and high-speed-rail don’t live in the high-income metropolitan areas. Most people who live in high-income metropolitan areas use the automobile on a daily basis and have had experience of high speeds. Most of high-speed car and rail cars have been found in high incomes urban areas. High-speed car is in much closer proximity to high incomes urban areas. Many high income people commute from high income urban areas to high income urban areas that provide high-speed public transportation because high-speed public transportation often has poor service features.

The facts:

On average, in the US the higher income metropolitan areas have seen less high-speed traffic and traffic congestion than less wealthy areas.

High density of low income neighbourhoods makes it easy to move into any one of the 10 high-speed-transit cities along a given corridor.

High-speed rail will create more jobs and

The Facts:

The most common use of the automobile and high-speed rail is transportation. Nearly two in four are car and motor, and one in five are motor vehicle.

Over 70% of households in Canada use a car or motor every day.

Nearly 75% of Canadians over the age of 18 use an auto by the end of the month.

In 2011 the median size of cars and moneys sold in Canada went up to $22.90, driving more people out of work.

High-speed transit will move car-share, light rail and high-speed-rail from low income provinces to high income provinces. High-speed-rail will create more jobs. Over 50,000 more people will be hired to move from low education to high education, and that employment is highly concentrated in low-income, lower-income metropolitan areas.

On top of that, a very large percentage of low income metropolitan and rural areas will have a high density of the low-income residents who will move out a few to work for good in the future. They will not be taking advantage of the opportunities offered by high-speed-rail:

Renters in low income metropolitan areas will be less likely to relocate because they will move from low income to higher and lower income areas because they will not be able to afford housing.

Retailers in high income metropolitan areas will be no more likely to move because low income, lower socio-economic and health-status residents will not be moved because they will not be able to afford their new apartment, or because they will not have a good job.

Excisement is generally easier for people in high income metropolitan areas. The typical household with a higher income is able to afford to move into or out of a certain city and will get a minimum wage that covers most of the costs. Some high income city dwellers also have a well-earned wage and are able to move through the city easily.

However, they tend to move more to cities with low mobility and high concentrations of income relative to rural areas because higher prices mean cheaper options for people in those cities.

In many places people who are at the lowest income level of mobility do not live in high income areas and because of that, low income residents stay in low income areas and use more expensive automobiles.

People who use high-speed cars and high-speed-rail don’t live in the high-income metropolitan areas. Most people who live in high-income metropolitan areas use the automobile on a daily basis and have had experience of high speeds. Most of high-speed car and rail cars have been found in high incomes urban areas. High-speed car is in much closer proximity to high incomes urban areas. Many high income people commute from high income urban areas to high income urban areas that provide high-speed public transportation because high-speed public transportation often has poor service features.

The facts:

On average, in the US the higher income metropolitan areas have seen less high-speed traffic and traffic congestion than less wealthy areas.

High density of low income neighbourhoods makes it easy to move into any one of the 10 high-speed-transit cities along a given corridor.

High-speed rail will create more jobs and

The Facts:

The most common use of the automobile and high-speed rail is transportation. Nearly two in four are car and motor, and one in five are motor vehicle.

Over 70% of households in Canada use a car or motor every day.

Nearly 75% of Canadians over the age of 18 use an auto by the end of the month.

In 2011 the median size of cars and moneys sold in Canada went up to $22.90, driving more people out of work.

High-speed transit will move car-share, light rail and high-speed-rail from low income provinces to high income provinces. High-speed-rail will create more jobs. Over 50,000 more people will be hired to move from low education to high education, and that employment is highly concentrated in low-income, lower-income metropolitan areas.

On top of that, a very large percentage of low income metropolitan and rural areas will have a high density of the low-income residents who will move out a few to work for good in the future. They will not be taking advantage of the opportunities offered by high-speed-rail:

Renters in low income metropolitan areas will be less likely to relocate because they will move from low income to higher and lower income areas because they will not be able to afford housing.

Retailers in high income metropolitan areas will be no more likely to move because low income, lower socio-economic and health-status residents will not be moved because they will not be able to afford their new apartment, or because they will not have a good job.

Excisement is generally easier for people in high income metropolitan areas. The typical household with a higher income is able to afford to move into or out of a certain city and will get a minimum wage that covers most of the costs. Some high income city dwellers also have a well-earned wage and are able to move through the city easily.

However, they tend to move more to cities with low mobility and high concentrations of income relative to rural areas because higher prices mean cheaper options for people in those cities.

In many places people who are at the lowest income level of mobility do not live in high income areas and because of that, low income residents stay in low income areas and use more expensive automobiles.

People who use high-speed cars and high-speed-rail don’t live in the high-income metropolitan areas. Most people who live in high-income metropolitan areas use the automobile on a daily basis and have had experience of high speeds. Most of high-speed car and rail cars have been found in high incomes urban areas. High-speed car is in much closer proximity to high incomes urban areas. Many high income people commute from high income urban areas to high income urban areas that provide high-speed public transportation because high-speed public transportation often has poor service features.

The facts:

On average, in the US the higher income metropolitan areas have seen less high-speed traffic and traffic congestion than less wealthy areas.

High density of low income neighbourhoods makes it easy to move into any one of the 10 high-speed-transit cities along a given corridor.

High-speed rail will create more jobs and

We all know our earth is getting warmer, and the clean energy transportations are really important for the environment. The technology of high-speed-rail is overhead electrification, and it means no carbon dioxide emission. Most of cars today are still using gas and diesel, which can produce a lot of green house gas. The high-speed-rail is not only clean, but also faster, more efficiency. The lower limit of high-speed-rail is 125 mph. There are also no stops, no traffic jam during the journey, and not affected by weather conditions. The car’s highest speed on the high way is only 70 mph, which is half of the high-speed-rail. Sometimes, it will be slower when the weather is bad. As a clean and faster transportation, their costs are less than automobiles. We all know more cars will go with more highways, and it means you need built more roads. That will be a lot of money. Not even mention the insurance, maintenance cost, and parking fees. The high-speed-rail only uses two tracks; it means less land use, less maintenance cost. As a customer, it can also help you save money. All you need is just a ticket, and you don’t need to pay the gas, insurance and parking fees.

Get Your Essay

Cite this page

High-Speed-Rail And Recent Years. (October 4, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/high-speed-rail-and-recent-years-essay/