Essay About Higher Amounts And Hup Seng Industries Berhadformulas

Efficiency of Cash Flow Comparison Between Hwa Tai Industries Berhad and Hup Seng Industries Berhad
Essay Preview: Efficiency of Cash Flow Comparison Between Hwa Tai Industries Berhad and Hup Seng Industries Berhad
Report this essay
Efficiency of cash flow comparison between Hwa Tai Industries Berhad and Hup Seng Industries BerhadFormulas:Cash and cash equivalent flows= (Cash and bank balances+ Short-term deposits                                                placed with a licensed bank) – bank overdraftHWA TAI INDUSTRIES BERHADYEAR20112012201320142015Cash and bank balance (RM)3,320,1912,460,5941,657,3881,124,7062,348,425Short-term depositsplaced with alicensed bank(RM)—-7,059,807Bank Overdraft(RM)3,281,1323,489,5882,453,3212,280,8414,001,201Cash and cash equivalent (RM)39,059-1,028,994-795,933-1,156,1355,407,031Formula: Deposit with licensed banks + cash and cash balanceHUP SENG INDUSTRIS BERHADYEAR20112012201320142015Cash and cash balance (RM)179,6043,204,043231,876157,224250,376Deposit with licensed banks (RM)25,520,25035,000,00028,732,41839,107,31036,058,410Cash and cash equivalent (RM)25,699,85438,204,04328,964,29439,264,53436,308,786Tables above show cash and cash equivalent flows of Hwa Tai Industries Berhad and Hup Seng Industries Berhad from year 2011 to year 2015. In year 2011, cash and cash equivalent of Hup Seng Industries Berhad achieved RM 25,699,854 compared to Hwa Tai at RM 39,059. The value of cash and cash equivalent was affected by the act of Hwa Tai in stated net of bank overdrafts repayable on demands which is RM 3,281,132. In this case, Hup Seng had more advantage, the addition of deposit with licensed bank (RM 25,520,250) with cash and cash balance exist (RM 179,604)  resulted a higher amounts in cash and cash equivalent and a higher efficiency of cash flow in Hup Seng compared to Hwa Tai.However, situation of Hwa Tai turn worst while its cash and cash equivalent becomes negative value at year 2012. Inversely, cash and cash equivalent of Hup seng increased from RM25, 699,854 in year 2011 into RM38, 204,043 in year 2012. The less efficiency of Hwa Tai may associates with the poor net cash flow used in financing activities which is       –RM 1,592,230 due to the high amount of net repayment to subsidiary companies, drawdown of terms loans and net repayment of finance lease liabilities which is RM 521,734 , RM 481,179 and RM 524 893. High efficient growth in cash flows of Hup Seng may linked to the high amount of net cash flows in operating and investing activities compared to previous year.