Anything or WhereverEssay Preview: Anything or WhereverReport this essayAlthough sports and religion may seem to have little in common, we have attempted to demonstrate that contemporary sport and religion are related in a variety of ways. For many centuries, Christian church dogma was antithetical to play and sport activities, but over the past century, with the enormous growth of organized sport, churches and religious leaders have welded a link between these two activities by sponsoring sports events under religious auspices and proselytizing athletes to religion and then using them as missionaries to convert new members. While contemporary religion uses sport for the promotion of its causes, sport uses religion, as well. Numerous activities with a religious connotation – ceremonies, rituals, and so forth – are employed in connection with sports contests
―‖, or other types of events. In other words, when a religious organization’s activities are organized religiously, it makes every effort to follow religion, to promote it, to proselytize it, and thus to attract new members to the program of the organization. We consider both a sport and religion as part of a larger effort to promote and engage young people across the nation.
But we must begin to understand that these same religious leaders are not merely proselytizing athletes as an evangelist for a cause. What they do is essentially a form of indoctrination, and as a result, the programs and events it uses to recruit new members are very much like religious instruction, since it does not simply instruct young people to observe and respond to the gospel. The purpose of the activity is to bring people along, but this does not provide an instruction to the children who do not follow Christ, but rather to the people who will follow him. A person whose primary goal is to participate in this activity, then, is not a Christian at all—because, at the heart of it all, he does not follow the gospel. He continues to view his place of birth as a symbol for all the things that his Church strives to do, but where those goals are met by his actions, it is not really a Christian. Therefore, the Church is ultimately a ministry, not a ministry to be evangelized, or taught or preached in any form of a secular or religious fashion, by means of an organized evangelism program. As such, any Christian person who participates in the activities discussed here—or the activities being conducted—should not be seen as a “non-Christian.” And, for this reason, even if this were true, there is no way to know what has motivated the behavior of the leaders who endorse the activities, or when the activities began. All the same, this brings us back to the main point: as I’ve said before, the church’s role is to inform our young people (and adults) about issues of life and death or to teach them about the gospel. As well, the church’s primary function is to recruit, train, and educate the young. In the course of their training, individuals are often made to follow Christian teachings on life and death, as well as biblical teachings on the meaning of life and death so that they can help us live better lives. As such, this is the central purpose of the Church’s teaching programs, and each program is intended to be taught individually. With that said, let me point out that the main purpose of any program is to advance a belief or a practice, and as such many other purposes, including, for instance, religious ministry, are also part of the purpose as well.[27] In other words, we have a fundamental understanding of things such as the nature and meaning of faith, and the extent to which we can learn what is going on when we can and how we can learn it. As such, it cannot be argued that Christian activities and activities are mutually exclusive. This does not mean that they cannot be connected, however. However, the fact is that many of these activities take place at different locations around the nation, and there are differences among them. Those who seek to promote this kind of involvement in the United States need to take into account their local communities’ needs, and whether they participate in their local church or other religious activity, to the best of their ability. For instance, if the leaders or teachers
…Perhaps the most direct consequence of homelessness is the separation of children from their parents. Wright suggests that while most homeless families have dependent children, only about half have their children living with them. This is attributed to several factors. Anticipating homelessness, some parents voluntarily place their children in foster care directly prior to their episode of homelessness; other children are removed from families because of abuse and neglect, homelessness often being considered a form of neglect. Homeless facility requirements may also inadvertently contribute to family dissolution. Many family shelters have eligibility requirements; the most frequently cited restriction is the refusal to accept adolescent males, or any males over the age of fourteen, including fathers. One result of these regulations is that many older homeless children leave their families and try to make it on their own. Research on homeless children and families suggests that they appear particularly vulnerable to psychological, emotional, and developmental risk. Housing assistance alone may not be sufficient to guarantee either long-term, independent living, or the healthy child and family development that likely have been compromised by episodes of homelessness…
Anyone who has grown up in our culture knows that exposure to television shows, films, and other mass media presentations depicting danger, injury, bizarre images, and terror-stricken victims can scare an audience. Most of us seem to be able to remember at least one specific program or movie that terrified us when we were a child and that made us nervous, remained in our thoughts, and affected other aspects of our behavior for some time afterwards. Anecdotal evidence abounds, and, although research interest in this topic has been sporadic over the years, studies published in every decade starting with the 1930s have indicated that transitory fright responses to mass media stimuli are quite typical, and that enduring, and sometimes severe, emotional disturbances occur in a substantial proportion of children…
…In his request for aid to Greece and Turkey in March 1947, President