Relationship Between Guns And Crime
Essay Preview: Relationship Between Guns And Crime
Report this essay
Relationship between Guns and Crime
Over the past decade or so, crime has been on a constant decrease. Most of which has to do with increased law enforcement and stricter policies on the sales of guns. Many people believe that guns are the sole reason that crimes are committed. Some research proves that belief wrong, yet other statistics can argue the exact opposite. In America, gun ownership is about three out of every ten people. A majority of these people included in the 33% that actually have guns, are said to only use them for hunting, protection, or a feeling of safety. In a scenario in which a gun is used to commit a crime, it hardly resembles the populous of the 33% gun ownership rate that is seen in the poll. This is mostly due to the fact of the general population which is underage, being able to get a hold of a weapon illegally for homicidal use. One example would be the Columbine shooting. All of the bullets were purchased at a local retail store but the guns could not have been vended out to the underage teenagers. Instead they were purchased by older people with the availability to buy the gun for the minor. Here the illegally possessed guns are not counted in the statistic stated above. It is easy to see how guns and crime can be easily related when people that are not certified or allowed to have a weapon do have use of it, it is extremely dangerous and most usually results in homicide or very serious injury due to the fact of either low to no experience and no official background check has been performed. I personally believe that guns DO increase the rate of crime in a domino effect.
However some polls comparing the homicide rates in other countries can also backup the fact that guns do not necessarily have any relationship with crime. For instance, the United States has the third highest homicide rate in the world, next to China being first, and then India (second). People in America tend to feel a right in owning a gun. The second amendment even states, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Many other countries differ greatly from America, but the gun ownership is still at a mean. Thus making a relative statement between guns and crime, the amount of homicides differ with the same amount of guns possessed by the public. All in all whether there are guns or not, if a violent act of homicide is to be committed, guns are just a needle in a haystack of other ways for crime to be committed.
According to statistics from the site usatoday.com, the number of people who were victims of all violent crimes except murder fell by 9% in 2001. This was the crimes rates lowest point since 1973. If noticed, the 9% drop was of all violent crimes except murder. In crime cases where guns are used, murder is almost inevitable, hereby showing that a decreased crime rate overall does not rely completely on guns relating to the crime. Usatoday.com makes an important statement on the rate at which criminals used guns to accomplish their crimes. This statistic has been held steady at about 26%. So if the amount of crimes that are committed by guns has stayed the same, why has crime rate as a whole decreased? There are several explanations that can be said. First of all, even with stricter gun sale policies and the help of the Brady act, established in 1993, teens have still found ways to posses weapons. Secondly an increased awareness of the law enforcement has been said to help stop the illegal possession of guns on the street, even if the weapon is concealed. If more guns have been taken off the street, yet the homicide rate has stayed the same, this explanation becomes a bit hard to believe. The third explanation can say that while holding other things as a constant, adding guns to the hands of law enforcers overall has reduced crime influenced by guns.
If dated back in history, guns were first invented in a time of brutal war where more powerful weaponry was needed. Other uses were eventually found for the gun, such as hunting, target practice, or even a green light for races and such. Outside of the British first inventing the gun for war use to rule other countries for over two hundred years, gun use became very popular in hunting compared to the use of the traditional bow and arrow. This new trend had soon taken its place and people all over the world were eventually supplied with guns for easier purpose of getting the animal needed for food. Even in todays world, guns are by far the most popular weaponry used for hunting. At the age of eighteen, a person is allowed to buy a long rifle, used completely for the purpose of hunting. These guns should not be used for a feeling of personal safety and have rarely been used in cases of homicide. Pistols are only to be sold to persons of age twenty one and older. With these stricter gun policies and restrictions, they still can find their way into the wrong hands. A metaphoric conclusion to this happening is just like drugs being smuggled in from other countries. Even with all of the laws forbidding illegal drug possession and use, they can still make it to the streets very easily.
The Columbine shooting is a great example to show gun relation to crime. Had these two teenagers not been able to get the guns used in the shooting, (Eric Harris; 12 gauge Savage-Springfield 67H pump-action shotgun and a Hi-Point 995 Carbine 9 mm semi-automatic rifle with 10 round magazines) (Dylan Klebold; 9 mm Intratec Tec-9 Semi-automatic handgun manufactured by Navegar, Inc. with 32 round magazines and a 12 gauge Stevens 311D double barreled sawed-off shotgun) the whole massacre would have never happened. Along with them they had both also brought numerous knives with them. Without