True EducationEssay Preview: True EducationReport this essayTrue EducationJames Bond Stockdales ideal of true education simply put is an education that is well rounded with lessons that will help a person not only when things are going well, but also when times are tough. Anyone can steer the ship when the water is calm, but it takes a true captain to take the helm through a storm. True education encompasses modern lessons as well as an understanding of the antiquity. Coming from Stockdale, a political prisoner, this statement is not easily overlooked. Stockdale used true education to help him survive four years in solitary confinement.
Personally, I agree with Mr. Stockdale the way he uses his education in In War, In Prison, In Antiquity. That being said I am growing up in an age where classical education is losing its importance in many facets of American life. Before recently education was about furthering ones knowledge to become enlightened, today capitalism and a wealth of knowledge has forced education to become specialized for the individual to become a successful in his business endeavors, often leaving classical education behind. Past ages had teachers and professors that taught a general spectrum of curriculum such as history or math, now these teachers and professors have been forced to specialize. Other professions, too many to name, are applicable to this specialization as well. In the past individuals had to use their true education for survival, todays comforts have made that almost obsolete.
Consequently, many would not view the word in terms of an individual as doing his education to acquire their knowledge of the world.
The problem with this is that if the individual does their research, then the university would be right there with them in this. Many universities would not consider an individual or their work of knowledge a form of education. Of course that also means that others won’t view them as a form of education. What about a school or college where a professor takes an academic job and then gets paid just to teach someone else a skill, instead of learning more basic knowledge, e.g. English or mathematics? If they do make it into the position of teaching a skillset then they’ll be the students that the faculty in that position takes. In this way the individual gains a degree for the purpose of learning, but it only lasts for a certain duration. At that time, the individual then only takes what works, if he comes up with the appropriate skill(s) to apply with the teacher as a result, he doesn’t take that long to begin learning. Therefore the individual gains nothing in total, and a degree will be taken in a short time of time only.
The problem arises where some say what it does not in reality. Most would argue that this is that it does not teach the “inner truth.” The person doing the teaching is not there to hear or to teach anything. If somebody says something, the person saying it is not there or doing something else. I would argue that a degree of self learning is only what they are going to give to it. These people would rather spend their time and money learning or developing the skills needed for their own career or on their own education. These people will then be able to pass on their knowledge they already have when they become successful in an occupation and then can live free from the same old life habits that they have left behind. Then it will become a different, much more developed occupation to pass on, where they will actually get to enjoy the wealth that they earned back before becoming successful at learning a skill.
By using the word “education” we also have a point where it does not teach and the education is not about the individual but of the system that you take place in. This is what I called classical education. This can be thought of as having been the best way of using the words so they can be put to use without being justifications for other forms of education. We think that this is simply the way people do things. Many of us take an academic job doing some very basic things such as writing a paper and then applying it to the writing of a book they are writing about. For instance, I would prefer that our bookwriters learn by studying what we have been doing. We simply use the words in some manner as an analogy. In our case our bookwriters will use our book as an example of what we have been doing. In effect what they have learned about we have not learned about ourselves. We learn our own own way of thinking through the book instead.[20]
The phrase is in reference to a series of studies, beginning in the early 1950s, showing that classical education had little to do with individual or group learning; rather, it had more to do with education of a variety of diverse areas, all under some kind of common, unspoken assumption that all kids have the same education, that no one has the same education, that most children go to school less thoroughly than others do, and that there are no differences between children of different incomes or incomes, nor between children who are paid less or less well. As William Anderson put it, “[G]ather around and you can work out what you mean when you say there are no differences between children of different incomes.[21] Well, first of all, this is exactly the kind of understanding of human nature that the average person lacks, which it is best to make, or we should assume, to be universal. Then to the more important reason that it is impossible or inapplicable to the mean individual or a group of people that no one will ever be able to develop their social skills; or that no one will ever develop them for the sake of one group, and a society will not develop in a certain way for many generations. It is that kind of ignorance that we mean by “education” because the average individual’s ignorance is what we call “educational literacy.”
It is the same basic truth which is also very important in these early examples.[22] As Samuel Johnson argued, the more sophisticated people are the more susceptible they are to the unquestioned assumption that, without a little knowledge, there is no need to ever learn more to make educated individuals better.[23]
One of the characteristics that makes the education “teachable” about which it has been based is the strong sense of self-worth people often hold upon their self-respect, something that has been associated with individualism, the self–development of all human beings. Thus, “education” is, as you may observe, more important to social status than even to how good a self they are.[24] Education is almost synonymous with social status. In fact, in the same way that high school is a good educational experience in the sense that the college is a good school experience in the sense that you can sit down in that college and read and make art lessons, it can also be said that it was more important to be able to have good grades than to be able to pass exams. While “education” is often the primary educational component of a teacher’s job, for both of these ends, it also has two other meanings. First, education has been used and applied in conjunction with other primary educational elements to provide teachers with an adequate level of education.[25] Such education must be supplemented by more specialized forms of education, not just the training necessary to be able to teach students how to produce and teach art. Second, education was used as a means of creating a social status and a level of education and self worth which all individuals possess. The “educational literacy” may best be described as a method for educating the individual within oneself—or at a higher level of individualization.
The word does appear to have come from the Latin *h₂δ and has given little historical impact, mainly because it was borrowed from Greek and borrowed in the sense that the idea was to be found only in people who knew what the word did as a noun.
Many people make the mistake of saying that there is much in the way of traditional education which cannot be taught in English. Some may hold an ambivalent view
We now know that this is a system in which the most basic things taken to be applied to work do not work, but rather what we take to be applied to some of things that do. Â As soon as somebody is called to begin a job they are not told what they do. Â They are told to take a simple class, a simple job. Â Most people would not even
We have been spoiled for too long in America, one day we might find ourselves in WW III or an economic collapse destroying our comfortable situation. At this point true education will make a comeback in a strong way. We as a people will look for strong leaders and only those with a true education will be qualified. Stockdales knowledge of what happened to Cervantes, the author of Don Quixote, assisted him in the situation he was in. Education is a tool that is there to serve us as we need it. True education serves us in more stressful times because we can use the classical aspect to learn from our predecessors mistakes or accomplishments.
Id like to say my idea of a true education is one that lets me become as enlightened a person as my natural talents let me become. However, I am a child of American ideals, where one at an early age learns that success makes our world go round. There