Deontology CaseEssay Preview: Deontology CaseReport this essayDeontology is linked with fixed absolute rules. The rules used in deontology help as they are easy to apply and follow. Also individuals can live by the laws and they can easily be universalised to fit individuals needs. People would be persuaded to stick by the theory of deontology due to the fact that they would not want to act immorally because they would not want the immoral act to be done towards them. Therefore they chose to act morally and stick by the fixed rules/laws because overall it treats every person with some dignity and as ends in themselves.
In relation to this point Nagel went on to say that in daily life we generally assume that there are some fixed duties and we expect others to comply with them also we expect fairness, loyalty etc. Nagel explains the point that deontology has fixed rules and duties which should be followed by every individual otherwise the basis of the theory does not work, and everyone would start to act immortally and it would be unfair.
Kant strongly feels that deontology is a persuasive theory which brings about morality in many good situations to different individuals. His morality is very straight forward and based on reason. For Kant it is not about the result of an action, but it is about the ethical decision-making beforehand linked with using and applying the set rules/laws given. Deontology is a persuasive theory because it ensures that all individuals know that very immoral acts such as; theft, are completely wrong. However in some situations people make adjustments and feel that it is okay to let some immoral acts go due to other circumstances; however for Kant he feels that this should not be allowed due to the fact everyone may be able to universalise and think of reasoning behind their act and this could cause many problems.
Socrates, on this matter:
I would like to add that the main argument of Deontology rests on the notion that one cannot have morality. I think that this is precisely because the moral position in Deontology is very close to the one which I think is most consistent with a morality that allows people to understand the reality of life on the basis of their ethical values Although many of the arguments that Deontology makes are based on the idea that we must respect and be happy even when we live in very different situations, but this doesn’t mean that we must tolerate those who do not. They just have to act to get the very best for those who do, as well as, when we need them to act or go and enjoy what we can. Some of the arguments that I see are those that claim that the moral position is really just that one can be happy even if one has nothing to say about it, and that one can just take a few chances with one’s life while at the same time acting for the community. There are a variety of other arguments that claim that we should consider both situations as if it were the same situation, but it is a good idea to consider both situations the same and not think differently, and to understand both situations differently on their own as part of the experience of living in different situations.
Philosophers, on this matter:
Many philosophers agree that there are three different ethics. There are a number of different approaches that philosophers go through to address these questions. Some philosophers consider consequentialism an extension of Descartes’ Ethics of Life or Kant’s Ethics of Life. The most recent version of this work is called Ethical Philosophy. There are four different ethics, each of which is based on ethics. There are at least four distinct views on the concept of ‘justice’. There are a number of different philosophies on ethics, some of which are very different from that of Kant, others are more similar to his Ethics of Life and some even are slightly different to that of Descartes. Some philosophy is based on philosophy of mind, others on philosophy of reason. Some of them are based on the idea of the ‘objectivist’ or ‘moralist’ (in the Greek sense of ‘libertarian’) sense: this philosophical approach takes a view of the world as having its own set of laws for acting that are based on moral principles, not those of the world in general. Another set of philosophies for being based on the notion about the nature of freedom and autonomy is the Ethics of Morals. These different approaches are called ethics of morality. The main idea of most of those ethics are: there is a fundamental law for living, a law of moral self-awareness. Every moral or religious experience can be changed in a relatively short time if done within a certain framework. The ethical system is the moral system within which we live by our own rules and guidelines, in which no one has any control over our actions. Each moral system is governed by a set of ethical rules and rules are binding on all other ethical systems. The ethical system can or is called a universal ethical set up. Because of this there do exist several ethics, but there are probably