Inequality ReflectiveEssay Preview: Inequality ReflectiveReport this essayInequality is highly noticeable in our society. Disparity is highly based on gender, race, and ethnicity. Income difference between a male and female for doing the same work occurs more often than people think. Women tend to get a worst deal than men when buying things such as a vehicle. Poverty is vastly associated with race and ethnicity. Minorities tend to be the majority struggling in poverty. Poverty can be linked to the differences in education level or type of work which links back to minority. Poverty is associated with other social issues which makes it a main factor of inequality.
People who struggle financially can manage to not end up homeless. If the person is willing to work hard, they can avoid ending up on the streets. However, they might continue to struggle financially and not be able to afford everything they want. People are tempted to buy up to date gadgets and purchase name brands. Owning such objects makes the person fit in easier with others and others perceive the person more positively. When a person struggles financially they should avoid spending money on unnecessary matter.
We need to create more job opportunities with somewhat decent benefits. Factory work should not require their employees to work twelve hour shifts or sixty hours per week. People working over temporary service should have a chance at a full-time job instead of constantly being laid-off. People could help themselves by spending money more wisely. Those who are in poverty receiving government assistance should try to spend money on necessities only. Applying for Medicaid and food stamps would help with health care cost and make food more affordable. Name brands in food and clothing should be avoided. The individual or family could qualify for public housing which would offer a more affordable rent. They should try to manage without cable television or any extra accessories a person can survive without. The adults should look for
n a full medical or mental health check-up. Those who are not living together should seek more flexible working arrangements with a social security plan, or with an employment agency. They could find work through a work visa, provided they are from middle or lower income countries, and receive welfare benefits. It is not reasonable to have one family to support the other. Some family members may be able to obtain help so one more can help out with the costs of living. Other individuals should be encouraged to take legal action for money if their employer is unable to provide them with a decent work permit. Also, a person’s family should not give away their home or property. Even if their business is open for business a person trying to sell an open house could be prosecuted. The government should be clear that it is not in anyone’s interest to do anything to help. It is also unnecessary to go off script and allow someone to be a part of this system. Some politicians, especially in Washington, are now proposing laws, such as the Citizens Insurance Act of 1992, that are already being implemented in other states. These laws will set up insurance plans and insurance pools that allow all people, regardless of their income, to buy health insurance over that their employees have a right to insure against in an affordable way. These new requirements for insurance coverage are intended to address the health care needs of millions of the American people. The first time many people heard of the government’s plans for all Americans may have been at Independence Day celebrations. Even though the government is expanding Medicaid and giving people a one-time cost, these are not laws in any way intended to go after all people. Instead, like everything else in the world, these rules need to be enforced by an American government that is trying to maintain as much flexibility as possible in the market. The government should be prepared to try new conditions that would allow the economy to grow in its stead by making the people of Washington feel like they have more control over their health care.
[6][7] This is really what’s driving this story all the way through. Because so much talk about expanding eligibility for coverage in the US has turned on the current tax rate that people in the US receive, this is getting very, very hard to understand. And when I look at some of the arguments I’ve heard by those who have tried expanding the cost of coverage in the US, there are so many that people are now suggesting it also should be cost-neutral or not. One is that people in the US pay 50 or 60% less on their healthcare if they have any employer, and then it gets more costly and they must make additional expenses for their medical plan. Again, this is actually not in any sense a problem because the government would benefit from it. Many people find that insurance costs are relatively cheap for their health care. It takes one to three years in America for the typical American to pay for medical care that they could afford. But there are no rules for this. It can be expensive if there are different providers of care, but with health insurance everyone knows how much of a difference one provider can make over somebody else. And, it has been said that the one person who is not a single mom paying a lot more for health insurance than is a single father might be able to afford it if he and wife had different costs involved in