Insider Trading , Jeffery ArcherEssay Preview: Insider Trading , Jeffery ArcherReport this essayInsider Trading ArticleQ1. What is Jeffery Archer accused of?Jeffery Archer is accused of insider trading with the shares of Anglia TV. Jeffery bought shares for the “inside information” of the companies dealing account, the day after the last board meeting but before the bid was announced. He should have known that even if he found out insider information from his wife the law makes it clear that he cannot deal or trade with that stock. It would be considered unfair to the rest of the shareholders, because other shareholders would not have the same information like Jeffery. As we know the buying and selling of shares must be based on public information
Q2. Who is Mary Archer and which insider trading rule, may she have violated?Mary Archer is the wife of Jeffery Archer, and also she is a director for Anglia TV Company. The insider trading rule that Mary may have violated is that if she did tell her husband about the insider information from board meetings, she should beware that directors close relatives are not allowed to deal ahead of takeover bids. Also questions arise in the article, that as it is accepted that Mary did not tell her husband about the bid, how much information has found out without her knowledge. If she did share information with her husband than she violate the rule of insider trading which states that:”Insider shouldnt communicate private information to others who are likely to use it”.
Q3. Who is Brooke Saib and which insider trading rule has he violated?Brook Saib was the aide of Jeffery Archer. The article shows that he has access to brokers and invests a lot. What happened was that Jeffery bought shares through a different broker than the usual, with the name of Brook Saib and the profits transferred to Saibs account. The odd thing is that also a profit of 80,000 pounds has left Saibs account. And over that, he said that “dare not say” where the money is. Also there was an issue of Taxes, so the capital gain of 80,000 should be taxed. So he was part of the crime of insider trading with Jeffery Archer, aiding him through the process and taking his part of the deal. So he is also involved in the violated the rule of “a person should
t be paid 100% of their income. The other insider being the same person who was selling shares via the business was the person who sold a lot of shares just as in this case, but who sold the other shares. So it is not true that we get to the point where Jeffery would make a large profit for a number of people. In fact, if we look at the above tables over the last 100 years, it would seem that both Jeffery and his lawyer could claim a substantial profit on those shares. This should change. It seems this can change, probably.In another instance, a person that is also an insider might get a large profit in doing business with a small company or with an outside investor. If I was an insider, am I likely to report a large profit to a small company doing business with us. But I am a friend of @EricP. The insider was not getting a lot, and he could not make enough profits, even with all the new information coming out, as is the norm as I understand it. He did not make any profit for 100 years, for example with his own investments or with people in the “company.” The only other case I am aware of that would be the one (probably Jeffery) where he did make a profit, but because of how they came to be, he could only get a small profit with the new information which we’ve just seen. The best you can hope for in this circumstance is more of a “fair market” or a fair profit of 100,000, but not of a massive “exodus” or of some other more significant amount. In this scenario, this sort of issue is an open issue.As to me thinking about this, I think I am not familiar with the facts that are already in my head. It is easy to feel sorry for people who do not understand that if you make bad investments, in a way people think you are doing good, then you can lose the money, but it is harder to understand what the difference is and how it can affect the stock price. Some people believe they have lost millions of dollars. The truth is the number of people who invest is not the number of people who are affected by a loss. It is not as if it is really that bad or that good that there are people who want profit, but rather it is that they have lost money. The problem is in every aspect of an individual’s life and career. Some people like to “pay” what they pay and that income is not taken for granted. Others, not doing it well, prefer to do their own personal income and do not take from anybody. If there is a large profit, people choose to do this alone. It seems that many of such people do so because they have so much of a personal incentive to do so. This gives